31.01.2013 Views

Consultation Paper on Alternative Dispute Resolution - Law Reform ...

Consultation Paper on Alternative Dispute Resolution - Law Reform ...

Consultation Paper on Alternative Dispute Resolution - Law Reform ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the provisi<strong>on</strong>s of the plan became legally enforceable <strong>on</strong>ce the parenting plan<br />

was registered and were enforceable as if they were court orders. An<br />

unregistered parenting plan had no such effect.<br />

5.24 A parenting plan became registered in a court after scrutiny by that<br />

court. To be registered, an applicati<strong>on</strong> was made to the court accompanied by a<br />

copy of the plan together with either a certificate of independent legal advice or<br />

a certificate that the plan was developed after c<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong> with a child and<br />

family counsellor. The court may have registered the plan if it c<strong>on</strong>sidered it<br />

appropriate to do so having regard to the best interests of the child to which the<br />

plan relates. A parenting plan may have been set aside where: it has been<br />

obtained by fraud, duress or undue influence; the parties wish it to be set aside;<br />

or it is in the child's best interests for it to be set aside. 28<br />

5.25 Statistics kept by the Family Court of Australia indicate that there was<br />

limited use of the registrati<strong>on</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong>s introduced by the 1995 Act. For<br />

example, in 1998-99 there were a total of 395 applicati<strong>on</strong>s to register parenting<br />

plans in the Family Court of Australia. In the same period, 320 plans were<br />

registered and there were 5 revocati<strong>on</strong>s of previously registered parenting<br />

plans. By c<strong>on</strong>trast, there were 15,553 c<strong>on</strong>sent orders sought during 1998-99. 29<br />

It has been suggested that a major reas<strong>on</strong> for the diminishing use of parenting<br />

plans was that lawyers and the court were not encouraging parents to register<br />

their parenting plans because of: the costs involved; the complexities<br />

associated with amending registered parenting plans (revocati<strong>on</strong> by further<br />

agreement); and an appreciati<strong>on</strong> that the registrati<strong>on</strong> of parenting plans is<br />

c<strong>on</strong>trary to the intenti<strong>on</strong> that they should be a flexible alternative to court<br />

adjudicati<strong>on</strong>. 30<br />

5.26 Arising from this, further changes were made by the Family <strong>Law</strong><br />

Amendment (Shared Resp<strong>on</strong>sibility) Act 2006. As a result a plan is not legally<br />

enforceable but parents can have their parenting plans made into 'c<strong>on</strong>sent<br />

orders'. C<strong>on</strong>sent orders are orders made by the court, with the agreement of<br />

both parents, and have the same legal force as other court orders.<br />

5.27 The 2006 Act amended the obligati<strong>on</strong>s of advisers (that is, legal<br />

practiti<strong>on</strong>ers, family counsellors, family dispute resoluti<strong>on</strong> practiti<strong>on</strong>ers and<br />

28 Secti<strong>on</strong> 63H of the 1975 Act, as amended by the 1995 Act.<br />

29 Letter of Advice to the Attorney-General <strong>on</strong> Parenting Plans Part 3 (Family <strong>Law</strong><br />

Council of Australia and the Nati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>Alternative</strong> <strong>Dispute</strong> Resoluti<strong>on</strong> Advisory<br />

Council of Australia, March 2000). Available at<br />

http://www.ag.gov.au/agd/www/Flchome.nsf/Page/23060A7517DA516ECA256B4<br />

3007E4AB7?OpenDocument.<br />

30 Ibid.<br />

170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!