06.02.2013 Views

Corynebacterium glutamicum - JUWEL - Forschungszentrum Jülich

Corynebacterium glutamicum - JUWEL - Forschungszentrum Jülich

Corynebacterium glutamicum - JUWEL - Forschungszentrum Jülich

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.2. First Case: Fermentation<br />

The same standard deviations of the measured values were used to add normally<br />

distributed noise with mean 0 to the data and re-estimate the parameters as shown in<br />

the setup before.<br />

4.2.2. Designed Experiments<br />

A fed-batch experiment was planned, similar to the experiments used for the development<br />

of the L-valine production process as mentioned in paragraph 3.4.1 on page 50. A<br />

maximal duration of 48 hours was used and the feed of a solution of 3.9 M substrate<br />

was described as periods of constant feed rates of six hours duration, with the first period<br />

without feed. The sampling times were fixed to every 1.5 hours with a longer period<br />

without sampling between 13.5 and 19.5 and between 37.5 and 43.5 hours. The initial<br />

volume was set to be 1.7 L and with the designed feed and the samples of 25 mL, the<br />

suspension volume was limited between 1.5 and 2.5 liter throughout the experiment in<br />

a similar matter as mentioned in paragraph 3.4.1. The initial biomass concentration<br />

was fixed at 0.25 g/L and the initial product concentration was kept fixed at 0.05 mM.<br />

Throughout the experiment, the substrate concentration was bound between 0.01 and<br />

277 mM, again in a similar matter as described in paragraph 3.4.1.<br />

The designed experiment consists of the parameters describing the feedrate over time<br />

and of the initial concentration of substrate. The initial substrate concentration was<br />

bound between 55 and 222 mM. The feedrates were bound between 0 and 0.1 L/h.<br />

The experiment was designed according to the 5 different design criteria which will be<br />

discussed in the following paragraphs.<br />

Box and Hill (BH)<br />

The designed experiment according to the BH criterion is shown in figure 4.3, illustrated<br />

by the expected concentrations according to the competing models.<br />

The Box and Hill criterion consists of a part which has the difference in the expected<br />

concentrations as its driving force and a part which is driven by the difference between<br />

the variances of the expected concentrations (model variances). In the current designed<br />

experiment, the model variances had by far the larger influence: only 3.4 · 10 −5 %ofthe<br />

criterion was accounted for by the part which is driven by the differences in the expected<br />

concentrations!<br />

The BH criterion is calculated as a summation over all measured values. The criterion<br />

for each state variable and each measured point is shown in figure 4.2.2. This figure<br />

clearly shows, that the criterion is practically completely accounted for by only a few<br />

substrate measurements. The criterion is especially high in a region where the expected<br />

substrate concentrations, shown in figure 4.3(b), differ much and where especially the<br />

concentration according to model Ferm2 gets high. The maximal contribution is found<br />

at the point where the concentration decreases rapidly to very low values according to<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!