longitudinal dispersion in nonuniform isotropic porous media
longitudinal dispersion in nonuniform isotropic porous media
longitudinal dispersion in nonuniform isotropic porous media
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
136<br />
CHAPTER 5<br />
A COMPARISON OF MODEL CALCULATIONS AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS<br />
As discussed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 3, the random capillary tube network model<br />
cannot predict the permeability of a <strong>nonuniform</strong> <strong>porous</strong> medium based on<br />
measurable structural features of the medium. The hypothesis suggested<br />
<strong>in</strong> Chapter 3 is that "network" effects on the pressure gradient tend to<br />
even out flux rates through pores of different sizes. Although the<br />
model is not suitable to predict permeability, it is still valuable as<br />
a <strong>dispersion</strong> model. The permeability model can be used to set the<br />
connectivity of the unit cell (see Chapter 3) by comparison with<br />
experimental data for the permeability. Alternatively, some other<br />
permeability model could be used which is able to predict permeability<br />
from structural features. The limited experimental data given <strong>in</strong><br />
Chapter 4 support equation (3.11) as a permeability formula, although<br />
there is no theoretical support for this relation. The approach used<br />
here is to match the experimental results for permeability with the<br />
permeability model by adjust<strong>in</strong>g the junction connectivity. Once the<br />
junction connectivity is set, the <strong>dispersion</strong> model is capable of<br />
predict<strong>in</strong>g the coefficient of <strong>longitud<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>dispersion</strong> based on<br />
structural features of the medium.<br />
5.1 Permeability Calculations; Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Junction Connectivity<br />
Permeability calculations us<strong>in</strong>g equation (3.15) were carried out<br />
with various junction connectivities <strong>in</strong> an attempt to match the<br />
measured permeabilities. These calculations were carried out us<strong>in</strong>g the