10.02.2013 Views

longitudinal dispersion in nonuniform isotropic porous media

longitudinal dispersion in nonuniform isotropic porous media

longitudinal dispersion in nonuniform isotropic porous media

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

137<br />

Monte Carlo <strong>in</strong>tegration technique described 1n Section 3.5. The pore<br />

size distribution used for the calculations is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.12.<br />

Although the same number of pores lead<strong>in</strong>g to and from a junction are<br />

required for a given unit cell (see Figure 3.2), it is possible to have<br />

a cont<strong>in</strong>uous range of junction connectivity for the network. This 1S<br />

accomplished by us<strong>in</strong>g the two nearest even connectivities, say C1 and<br />

C2, <strong>in</strong> proportion a, such that the connectivity for the network, C,<br />

is,<br />

C aC1 + (1-a)C2<br />

Table 5.1 shows the computed and measured permeabi1ities us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

"best fit" junction connectivity, C = 16. This parameter was set<br />

primarily to adjust the calculated permeability of the <strong>nonuniform</strong><br />

medium, s<strong>in</strong>ce the uniform medium was fairly <strong>in</strong>sensitive to the junction<br />

connectivity parameter. Table 5.1 also shows the permeability<br />

calculations when network effects are ignored (C -+ (0). As expected, the<br />

permeability of the <strong>nonuniform</strong> medium is significantly higher when the<br />

network effects are not taken <strong>in</strong>to account. Convergence of the Monte<br />

Carlo <strong>in</strong>tegration scheme for the <strong>nonuniform</strong> medium is slower than for<br />

the uniform medium, as shown <strong>in</strong> Figures 5.1 and 5.2. The <strong>nonuniform</strong><br />

medium required 400,000 iterations (unit cells) , while the uniform<br />

medium permeability was calculated us<strong>in</strong>g 100,000 iterations to get<br />

with<strong>in</strong> 2:1% of the f<strong>in</strong>al asymptotic value. Permeability as computed<br />

from equation (3.11) 1S seen <strong>in</strong> Table 5.1 to do reasonably well (with<strong>in</strong><br />

15%) for both the uniform and <strong>nonuniform</strong> medium. The Har<strong>in</strong>g and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!