Download pdf - CIB-W18
Download pdf - CIB-W18
Download pdf - CIB-W18
- TAGS
- download
- cib-w18.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
– the results given by the two SIF computational approaches are in good<br />
accord, however the ones of the crack closure integral method are more<br />
reliable;<br />
– the analysis of the course of computed SIFs has allowed to highlight the<br />
influence of parameters ar;<br />
– the numerical failure loads derived on the basis of Wu fracture criterion<br />
are in a good agreement with the results of the experimental data;<br />
– the course of these numerical failure loads has allow to highlight the influence<br />
of main parameters (ar, and α) on the splitting strength of<br />
beams also for those cases where testing is problematic because of the<br />
high embedding stresses;<br />
– the fittings made on the course of the numerical failure loads show how<br />
the structure of the prediction formula of van der Put is in a quite good<br />
agreement, the parameters of the power fitting however are different for<br />
the two beam sizes;<br />
– lastly, a relationship between the numerical critical crack lengths and α,<br />
has been derived.<br />
34-7-3 H J Larsen, P J Gustafsson<br />
Dowel joints loaded perpendicular to grain<br />
Abstract<br />
The results of tests with doweled joints in LVL loaded perpendicular to<br />
grain are reported. Four joint configurations were tested: 1, 2 and 3 dowels<br />
in line and 2 dowels side by side. Further tension and splitting properties<br />
perpendicular to grain were determined. Some of the specimens were<br />
stored and tested in standard climate (23 °C/65 % RH) but most were<br />
stored in an open barn in Southern Sweden. The specimens were long-term<br />
loaded in the barn with target load levels relative to the short-term strength<br />
of 65 % and 80 %. Load was applied winter, spring, summer, autumn 2000<br />
and winter 2001 to determine the influence of different climatic conditions.<br />
The main results are: The short-term strength is not influenced by<br />
the seasons. The short-term strength of the joints can be predicted by a<br />
simple equation based on linear fracture mechanics. The load-carrying capacity<br />
of two dowels side by side and a single dowel are identical. The effect<br />
of loading time for joints loaded perpendicular to grain is much more<br />
severe than for timber: the time to failure under a load level of 60 per cent<br />
is only 180 days. A safe load level is only about 30 percent of the short-<br />
term strength. The drying distortions of the specimens used to determine<br />
the tensile strength (40x70x280 m) have a great influence on the results,<br />
the mean value is only 0.67 MPa, the minimum value only 0.25 MPa.<br />
35-7-7 A J M Leijten<br />
Splitting strength of beams loaded by connections, model comparison<br />
Introduction<br />
Initially the problem of perpendicular to grain splitting of beams by connections<br />
was tried solved by empirical models. Lately models based on<br />
fracture mechanics were developed. Empirical models are only valid within<br />
the range of parameters tested therefore there is more credit in pursuing<br />
general physical oriented models. Empirical models for the problem concerned<br />
tend to have many parameters to take all possible influences and effects<br />
into account as is shown by the German model evaluated below. The<br />
last years two models are published both based on fracture mechanical<br />
principles. The first is by Van der Put & Leijten (Papers 33-7-7 and 34-7-<br />
1) the other by Larsen & Gustafsson (Paper 34-7-3).<br />
Model (1) by v. d. Put/Leijten (Eurocode5)<br />
h<br />
Fu � 2,58�b<br />
GGc<br />
1 � h / h<br />
Model (2) by Larsen /Gustafsson<br />
F � 2,82�<br />
b GG h<br />
u c e<br />
<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 4 CONNECTIONS page 4.33<br />
e<br />
Model (3) is a simplified Model (1), see Paper 33-7-7<br />
5,16 � b GG h / h<br />
c e<br />
where:<br />
Fu splitting shear strength of the beam loaded by a connection at mid span<br />
in [N]. For connections at the end of a cantilever the splitting<br />
strength is Fu/2.<br />
b width in [mm]<br />
� behaviour factor<br />
G shear modulus [N/mm 2 ]<br />
Gc fracture energy [N/mm 1,5 ]<br />
h beam depth in [mm]