11.02.2013 Views

Download pdf - CIB-W18

Download pdf - CIB-W18

Download pdf - CIB-W18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

– the results given by the two SIF computational approaches are in good<br />

accord, however the ones of the crack closure integral method are more<br />

reliable;<br />

– the analysis of the course of computed SIFs has allowed to highlight the<br />

influence of parameters ar;<br />

– the numerical failure loads derived on the basis of Wu fracture criterion<br />

are in a good agreement with the results of the experimental data;<br />

– the course of these numerical failure loads has allow to highlight the influence<br />

of main parameters (ar, and α) on the splitting strength of<br />

beams also for those cases where testing is problematic because of the<br />

high embedding stresses;<br />

– the fittings made on the course of the numerical failure loads show how<br />

the structure of the prediction formula of van der Put is in a quite good<br />

agreement, the parameters of the power fitting however are different for<br />

the two beam sizes;<br />

– lastly, a relationship between the numerical critical crack lengths and α,<br />

has been derived.<br />

34-7-3 H J Larsen, P J Gustafsson<br />

Dowel joints loaded perpendicular to grain<br />

Abstract<br />

The results of tests with doweled joints in LVL loaded perpendicular to<br />

grain are reported. Four joint configurations were tested: 1, 2 and 3 dowels<br />

in line and 2 dowels side by side. Further tension and splitting properties<br />

perpendicular to grain were determined. Some of the specimens were<br />

stored and tested in standard climate (23 °C/65 % RH) but most were<br />

stored in an open barn in Southern Sweden. The specimens were long-term<br />

loaded in the barn with target load levels relative to the short-term strength<br />

of 65 % and 80 %. Load was applied winter, spring, summer, autumn 2000<br />

and winter 2001 to determine the influence of different climatic conditions.<br />

The main results are: The short-term strength is not influenced by<br />

the seasons. The short-term strength of the joints can be predicted by a<br />

simple equation based on linear fracture mechanics. The load-carrying capacity<br />

of two dowels side by side and a single dowel are identical. The effect<br />

of loading time for joints loaded perpendicular to grain is much more<br />

severe than for timber: the time to failure under a load level of 60 per cent<br />

is only 180 days. A safe load level is only about 30 percent of the short-<br />

term strength. The drying distortions of the specimens used to determine<br />

the tensile strength (40x70x280 m) have a great influence on the results,<br />

the mean value is only 0.67 MPa, the minimum value only 0.25 MPa.<br />

35-7-7 A J M Leijten<br />

Splitting strength of beams loaded by connections, model comparison<br />

Introduction<br />

Initially the problem of perpendicular to grain splitting of beams by connections<br />

was tried solved by empirical models. Lately models based on<br />

fracture mechanics were developed. Empirical models are only valid within<br />

the range of parameters tested therefore there is more credit in pursuing<br />

general physical oriented models. Empirical models for the problem concerned<br />

tend to have many parameters to take all possible influences and effects<br />

into account as is shown by the German model evaluated below. The<br />

last years two models are published both based on fracture mechanical<br />

principles. The first is by Van der Put & Leijten (Papers 33-7-7 and 34-7-<br />

1) the other by Larsen & Gustafsson (Paper 34-7-3).<br />

Model (1) by v. d. Put/Leijten (Eurocode5)<br />

h<br />

Fu � 2,58�b<br />

GGc<br />

1 � h / h<br />

Model (2) by Larsen /Gustafsson<br />

F � 2,82�<br />

b GG h<br />

u c e<br />

<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 4 CONNECTIONS page 4.33<br />

e<br />

Model (3) is a simplified Model (1), see Paper 33-7-7<br />

5,16 � b GG h / h<br />

c e<br />

where:<br />

Fu splitting shear strength of the beam loaded by a connection at mid span<br />

in [N]. For connections at the end of a cantilever the splitting<br />

strength is Fu/2.<br />

b width in [mm]<br />

� behaviour factor<br />

G shear modulus [N/mm 2 ]<br />

Gc fracture energy [N/mm 1,5 ]<br />

h beam depth in [mm]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!