Download pdf - CIB-W18
Download pdf - CIB-W18
Download pdf - CIB-W18
- TAGS
- download
- cib-w18.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Schematic plug shear failure<br />
Conclusions<br />
64 experiments on plug shear failure in nailed steel-to-wood connections<br />
were conducted. Based on experimental observations and the assumptions<br />
presented regarding material parameters, the model for predicting the<br />
characteristic plug shear resistance in the shear failure mode the following<br />
expression is suggested<br />
R � 0,8blf<br />
v, k v, k<br />
This model differs from the one suggested in Eurocode 5 (2003), Annex<br />
A, but leads to a safer design.<br />
37-7-6 H Johnsson<br />
Plug shear failure<br />
Abstract<br />
Plug shear failure in nailed timber connections is a brittle failure mode,<br />
which limits the capacity for nailed joints loaded in tension parallel to the<br />
grain. The limiting strength parameter for plug shear failure is for most<br />
cases the shear strength of timber. However, for short joints a tensile failure<br />
mode is possible. The occurrence of plug shear failure is closely linked<br />
to the spacing between the nails and in particular to the spacing perpendicular<br />
to the grain.<br />
Plug shear failure was studied in short-term experiments on nailed<br />
steel-to-timber joints. The occurrence of the tensile failure mode was<br />
shown as well as the effect of increased spacing, which increases the resistance<br />
and alters the course of failure. A prediction model is proposed<br />
for the tensile failure mode. A complete prediction model for plug shear<br />
failure in nailed joints is presented together with recommendations on nail<br />
spacing.<br />
Introduction<br />
When timber is stressed by a group of fasteners loaded in tension parallel<br />
to the grain it results in both tension and shear stresses parallel to the<br />
grain, see the figure, where the bottom and side faces of the plug are in<br />
shear. The resistance of the joint is the lowest value of the nail embedding<br />
and the plug shear resistance, which involves tensile (Rt) and shear<br />
(Rv)capacities. In Paper 36-7-2 the earlier models of Kangas and Vesa and<br />
Foschi and Longworth were evaluated and a model was proposed for predicting<br />
the plug shear resistance based on experimental evidence, Eqn. 1.<br />
� where � � 0,25<br />
f K bl �<br />
R blfv<br />
<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 4 CONNECTIONS page 4.9<br />
v<br />
� (1)<br />
In (1) b is the width of the plug, l is the length of the plug including the<br />
end distance and f v , is the shear strength of timber. The parameter<br />
Kdescribes the volume effect of shear strength and was experimentally determined<br />
to K � 64,5 .<br />
Schematic Plug Shear Failure<br />
Eqn. (1) describes the resistance of the shear failure mode of plug shear<br />
failure and in Paper 36-7-2 the course of plug shear failure was described:<br />
1. A crack develops internally along one side of the plug. The failure is initiated<br />
at the nail farthest from the free end.<br />
2. The crack reaches the free end and is visible on the edge. The same development<br />
goes for the other side of the plug. This occurs in two-thirds<br />
of the experiments before the ultimate load is reached.<br />
3. The end face of the plug fails in tension.