11.02.2013 Views

Download pdf - CIB-W18

Download pdf - CIB-W18

Download pdf - CIB-W18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Schematic plug shear failure<br />

Conclusions<br />

64 experiments on plug shear failure in nailed steel-to-wood connections<br />

were conducted. Based on experimental observations and the assumptions<br />

presented regarding material parameters, the model for predicting the<br />

characteristic plug shear resistance in the shear failure mode the following<br />

expression is suggested<br />

R � 0,8blf<br />

v, k v, k<br />

This model differs from the one suggested in Eurocode 5 (2003), Annex<br />

A, but leads to a safer design.<br />

37-7-6 H Johnsson<br />

Plug shear failure<br />

Abstract<br />

Plug shear failure in nailed timber connections is a brittle failure mode,<br />

which limits the capacity for nailed joints loaded in tension parallel to the<br />

grain. The limiting strength parameter for plug shear failure is for most<br />

cases the shear strength of timber. However, for short joints a tensile failure<br />

mode is possible. The occurrence of plug shear failure is closely linked<br />

to the spacing between the nails and in particular to the spacing perpendicular<br />

to the grain.<br />

Plug shear failure was studied in short-term experiments on nailed<br />

steel-to-timber joints. The occurrence of the tensile failure mode was<br />

shown as well as the effect of increased spacing, which increases the resistance<br />

and alters the course of failure. A prediction model is proposed<br />

for the tensile failure mode. A complete prediction model for plug shear<br />

failure in nailed joints is presented together with recommendations on nail<br />

spacing.<br />

Introduction<br />

When timber is stressed by a group of fasteners loaded in tension parallel<br />

to the grain it results in both tension and shear stresses parallel to the<br />

grain, see the figure, where the bottom and side faces of the plug are in<br />

shear. The resistance of the joint is the lowest value of the nail embedding<br />

and the plug shear resistance, which involves tensile (Rt) and shear<br />

(Rv)capacities. In Paper 36-7-2 the earlier models of Kangas and Vesa and<br />

Foschi and Longworth were evaluated and a model was proposed for predicting<br />

the plug shear resistance based on experimental evidence, Eqn. 1.<br />

� where � � 0,25<br />

f K bl �<br />

R blfv<br />

<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 4 CONNECTIONS page 4.9<br />

v<br />

� (1)<br />

In (1) b is the width of the plug, l is the length of the plug including the<br />

end distance and f v , is the shear strength of timber. The parameter<br />

Kdescribes the volume effect of shear strength and was experimentally determined<br />

to K � 64,5 .<br />

Schematic Plug Shear Failure<br />

Eqn. (1) describes the resistance of the shear failure mode of plug shear<br />

failure and in Paper 36-7-2 the course of plug shear failure was described:<br />

1. A crack develops internally along one side of the plug. The failure is initiated<br />

at the nail farthest from the free end.<br />

2. The crack reaches the free end and is visible on the edge. The same development<br />

goes for the other side of the plug. This occurs in two-thirds<br />

of the experiments before the ultimate load is reached.<br />

3. The end face of the plug fails in tension.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!