11.02.2013 Views

Download pdf - CIB-W18

Download pdf - CIB-W18

Download pdf - CIB-W18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and considering observations during testing an optimized screw for load<br />

carrying joints with steel plates and screws under an angle of 45° can be<br />

derived. This screw includes a strengthened shaft of about 3d length under<br />

the head in order to minimize the curb effect of the steel plate’s edge.<br />

Then an additional free length of about 1,5d is added to reach the optimal<br />

embedment depth of 2d below the surface. Finally a thread length of about<br />

18-20d is applied to the screw. As lower bound 18d are suggested because<br />

the critical length that marks the transition of withdrawal failure to screw<br />

failure is at around 16d (depending on steel strength). If the effect of embedment<br />

is taken into account this length could even be reduced to 14 –<br />

16d.<br />

Figure 12: Optimized screw geometry for load carrying steel plate connections<br />

Based on the research concerning moisture content and feedback from<br />

practical use it is proposed to limit screws to applications inside the service<br />

class 1 and 2.<br />

42-7-2 H Krenn, G Schickhofer<br />

Joints with inclined Screws and Steel Plates as outer Members<br />

Introduction<br />

The load-carrying capacity of connections with dowel-type fasteners and<br />

steel plates as outer member of a single shear connection, determined on<br />

the basis of Johansen’s yield theory, is limited by the embedding strength<br />

of the timber member and the bending capacity of the fastener. The use of<br />

self-tapping screws with continuous threads with the screw axis perpendicular<br />

to the axis of the timber member is very inefficient because of the<br />

limited diameter and the relatively small bending capacity of the screws.<br />

The application of inclined screws that are arranged under an angle of<br />

45° between screw axis and member axis was presented by Bejtka & Blass<br />

as well as Kevarinmäki in 2002. They showed that the load-carrying capacity<br />

and the stiffness of timber-to-timber connections in these joints is a<br />

lot higher compared to common shear connections due to the high withdrawal<br />

capacity of the screws. Going one step further, the additional use of<br />

steel plates with special holes, incorporating the geometry of the screw<br />

head, leads to a further increase in load-carrying capacity and stiffness of<br />

this steel-to-timber connection. The ultimate load of these joints is then<br />

mainly limited by the withdrawal capacity and the tensile capacity of the<br />

screw as well as the friction between the steel plate and the timber member.<br />

These parameters are relatively well known, whereas the influence of<br />

the number of fasteners in such a connection is in question.<br />

This paper will present the results of tests of joints with inclined screws<br />

in glued laminated .timber and steel plates as outer members. Some aspects<br />

of the influence of the number of fasteners will be discussed and a<br />

proposal for design rules for single-shear joints with inclined screws will<br />

be presented. General considerations about the joint geometry and the<br />

screw arrangement will will conclude the publication.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The test results of this study showed that steel-to-timber joints with inclined<br />

self-tapping screws yield a very high load-carrying capacity and an<br />

even more impressive stiffness. A simple truss-model, incorporating the<br />

axial resistance of the screw and the friction in the interface between timber<br />

member and steel plate, is sufficient for reliable design of these joints<br />

(although the dowel effect could be observed to some extent). In the ultimate<br />

limit state, the effective number of screws shall be taken into account<br />

<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 4 CONNECTIONS page 4.78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!