Download pdf - CIB-W18
Download pdf - CIB-W18
Download pdf - CIB-W18
- TAGS
- download
- cib-w18.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.10 NAIL PLATES<br />
14-7-1 B Norén<br />
Design of joints with nail plates<br />
Introduction<br />
For some time a small Nordic group has discussed guidelines for design of<br />
joints with nail plates in timber structures.<br />
Their draft proposal contains these sections:<br />
1. Definition and symbols<br />
2. Design calculations<br />
3. Material<br />
4. Manufacture and control<br />
5. Testing of plates and joints<br />
Section 5 is principally a reference to the testing standard proposed by<br />
NORDTEST and based on the RILEM/<strong>CIB</strong> recommendations.<br />
The paper presented here includes only Section 1 and 2 in which is given<br />
rules for design calculations. The outline is kept from the proposal:<br />
2.1 Model for calculation of joints<br />
2.2 Design against plate failure<br />
2.3 Design against plate grip failure<br />
2.4 Design against wood failure<br />
2.5 Rules for specific joints<br />
2.6 Calculation of slip<br />
18-7-6 N I Bovim, B Norén<br />
The strength of nail plates<br />
Introduction<br />
The strength of nail plates with respect to failure in the plate material have<br />
been examined by NTI as background for a Nordic proposal This proposal<br />
has been presented by B. Norén in Paper 14-7-1.<br />
The present paper gives a summary of test results and proposed design<br />
method for design against plate failure.<br />
Today, the design against plate failure is based on:<br />
1) strength of plate with respect to forces parallel to the joint between<br />
connected timber members. This is called the shear strength of the<br />
plate.<br />
2) strength with respect to forces perpendicular to the joint. This is called<br />
the plate strength of the plate.<br />
The existing rules give no interaction formula for combination of "shear"<br />
and "plate"-forces. Consider Fig. 1. The example demonstrates clearly that<br />
existing rules do not take care of the orthotropic behaviour of nail plates.<br />
An interaction formula based on "plate" and "shear"-components would be<br />
still worse and in reality meaningless!<br />
In many cases the rules are extremely unsafe (up to 200 percent for design<br />
values given in the Norwegian approval of the tested plate). This is<br />
the main reason for the work presented here.<br />
Figure 1. Example of nail plate joint. Existing design rules are drawn as a<br />
curve. Test results and common sense tell us that maximum strength is<br />
achieved for β = 60º.<br />
Conclusion<br />
The presented design method gives a good prediction of the plate strength<br />
of nail plates. The existing Nordic rules are partly unsafe and do not reflect<br />
the orthotropic behaviour of nail plates.<br />
<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 4 CONNECTIONS page 4.68