10.08.2013 Views

Download het supplement - KCE

Download het supplement - KCE

Download het supplement - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>KCE</strong> Reports 80S Maximum Billing Supplement 161<br />

10.2 UPDATE 2004-2008<br />

Since 2004 the number of implants and medical devices with a safety margin has<br />

increased substantially. To obtain a more accurate assessment of the budgetary cost of<br />

the integration of the safety margin in 2008, an update of the results in section 6.3.1 in<br />

the main report is necessary. Column 4 in Table AX.2 gives a list of nomenclature codes<br />

referring to implants and medical devices with a safety margin in March 2008. For the<br />

majority of these codes, a one-to-one relationship between the codes of 2004 and 2008<br />

could be made on the basis of the wording of the nomenclature code. This made it<br />

possible to assign the safety margin applicable in 2008 to them. For other nomenclature<br />

codes it seemed impossible to link codes of 2004 and 2008 in a reliable way.<br />

The update from 2004 to 2008 was worked out in three steps. First, for implants and<br />

medical devices with a safety margin in 2004, the budgetary cost in 2004 was raised by<br />

the increase in the number of cases for these nomenclature codes between 2004 and<br />

2008 qq (+3.58% or €8 441 788). Second, for codes in 2008 which could be linked to<br />

codes in 2004, the budgetary cost of integrating the safety margin into the MABcounters<br />

was simulated by assigning the safety margin of the codes in 2008 to each code<br />

belonging to a certain group in 2004. A group was defined as all nomenclature codes<br />

within the same wording (e.g. hydrocephalic valves). In case the codes of a group have<br />

different safety margins in 2008, a weighted safety margin was calculated in which the<br />

weight was based on the share of each code in the total number of cases. Taking also<br />

account of the increase in the number of cases between 2004 and 2008, the budgetary<br />

cost amounts to about €219 000. Third, for codes without a link between 2004 and<br />

2008, the budgetary cost was approximated by multiplying the theoretical rr safety<br />

margin of each nomenclature code by the number of cases. The result is the <strong>supplement</strong><br />

paid by the patient and equals the increase in the MAB-counters. Next, in line with the<br />

simulation results for implants and medical devices with a safety margin in 2004, 80% of<br />

the increase in the MAB-counters was considered as the budgetary cost for<br />

RIZIV/INAMI (€53 763). Adding up the results of the previous steps, gives a total cost<br />

of about €8 715 000 for the integration of the safety margin of implants and medical<br />

devices into the MAB-counters in 2008. ss<br />

qq Available from RIZIV/INAMI.<br />

rr Theoretical since hospitals are free to charge the safety margin.<br />

ss Steps 2 and 3 are exclusive of the self-employed and the cost is expressed in prices of 2004.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!