Download het supplement - KCE
Download het supplement - KCE
Download het supplement - KCE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>KCE</strong> Reports 80S Maximum Billing Supplement 161<br />
10.2 UPDATE 2004-2008<br />
Since 2004 the number of implants and medical devices with a safety margin has<br />
increased substantially. To obtain a more accurate assessment of the budgetary cost of<br />
the integration of the safety margin in 2008, an update of the results in section 6.3.1 in<br />
the main report is necessary. Column 4 in Table AX.2 gives a list of nomenclature codes<br />
referring to implants and medical devices with a safety margin in March 2008. For the<br />
majority of these codes, a one-to-one relationship between the codes of 2004 and 2008<br />
could be made on the basis of the wording of the nomenclature code. This made it<br />
possible to assign the safety margin applicable in 2008 to them. For other nomenclature<br />
codes it seemed impossible to link codes of 2004 and 2008 in a reliable way.<br />
The update from 2004 to 2008 was worked out in three steps. First, for implants and<br />
medical devices with a safety margin in 2004, the budgetary cost in 2004 was raised by<br />
the increase in the number of cases for these nomenclature codes between 2004 and<br />
2008 qq (+3.58% or €8 441 788). Second, for codes in 2008 which could be linked to<br />
codes in 2004, the budgetary cost of integrating the safety margin into the MABcounters<br />
was simulated by assigning the safety margin of the codes in 2008 to each code<br />
belonging to a certain group in 2004. A group was defined as all nomenclature codes<br />
within the same wording (e.g. hydrocephalic valves). In case the codes of a group have<br />
different safety margins in 2008, a weighted safety margin was calculated in which the<br />
weight was based on the share of each code in the total number of cases. Taking also<br />
account of the increase in the number of cases between 2004 and 2008, the budgetary<br />
cost amounts to about €219 000. Third, for codes without a link between 2004 and<br />
2008, the budgetary cost was approximated by multiplying the theoretical rr safety<br />
margin of each nomenclature code by the number of cases. The result is the <strong>supplement</strong><br />
paid by the patient and equals the increase in the MAB-counters. Next, in line with the<br />
simulation results for implants and medical devices with a safety margin in 2004, 80% of<br />
the increase in the MAB-counters was considered as the budgetary cost for<br />
RIZIV/INAMI (€53 763). Adding up the results of the previous steps, gives a total cost<br />
of about €8 715 000 for the integration of the safety margin of implants and medical<br />
devices into the MAB-counters in 2008. ss<br />
qq Available from RIZIV/INAMI.<br />
rr Theoretical since hospitals are free to charge the safety margin.<br />
ss Steps 2 and 3 are exclusive of the self-employed and the cost is expressed in prices of 2004.