04.01.2015 Views

Prosjektledelse, Nr. 2 - 2003 - Norsk senter for prosjektledelse - NTNU

Prosjektledelse, Nr. 2 - 2003 - Norsk senter for prosjektledelse - NTNU

Prosjektledelse, Nr. 2 - 2003 - Norsk senter for prosjektledelse - NTNU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

endeavour managing the inherent<br />

uncertainty and need <strong>for</strong> integration in<br />

order to deliver beneficial objectives of<br />

change” [2].<br />

The word Risk<br />

Project Management Institute (PMI)<br />

and the UK Association <strong>for</strong> Project<br />

Management (APM), both have adopted<br />

a broad view of risk. Their definitions<br />

of risk are very similar, as follows:<br />

APM<br />

“Risk – an uncertain event of set circumstances<br />

that, should it occur, will<br />

have an effect on the achievement of<br />

the project’s objective “ [3]<br />

PMI<br />

“Risk –an uncertain event or condition<br />

that, if it occurs, has a positive or negative<br />

effect on a project object” [4]<br />

The PMI definition of “Risk” allows<br />

<strong>for</strong> a positive and negative effect. In<br />

practical terms this may be so. An event<br />

may turn out better that anticipated<br />

and yield a positive effect on the event<br />

itself as well as interlinked activities.<br />

The measures implemented in the conventional<br />

RMP are barriers, or risk<br />

based strategies to prevent the negative<br />

potential to occur and to reduce the<br />

impact if it does occur. Assume that the<br />

event was completed successfully and<br />

the negative elements did not occur. Is<br />

this situation an opportunity, or a result<br />

of effective risk management Well,<br />

firstly, if the negative elements did not<br />

occur, - it could just be a probabilistic<br />

Cause & the roots of uncertainty<br />

Understanding the<br />

roots of uncertainty<br />

Uncertainty<br />

Uncertainty<br />

Management<br />

Prob. *utility<br />

Implication of significat uncertainty<br />

or random outcome, or the control barriers<br />

was proven effective or working<br />

methods to reduce the negative risk to<br />

occur was proven effective The learning<br />

outcome can be employed in opportunities<br />

that may improve project<br />

results and enhance value creation. But<br />

in order to achieve this a system <strong>for</strong><br />

such activities must be in place.<br />

The figure below gives an outline of a<br />

conceptual framework with focus on<br />

uncertainty management.<br />

Uncertainty in this conceptual model<br />

can encompass all elements, human,<br />

material in<strong>for</strong>mation, process, market<br />

situations, financial, contractual, technological,<br />

political, environmental, etc.<br />

The concepts uncertainty and risk are<br />

used in different ways in the literature.<br />

However, in general terms uncertainty<br />

characterises situations where the actual<br />

outcome of a particular event or activity<br />

is likely to deviate from the estimate<br />

or <strong>for</strong>ecast value. Uncertainty is the<br />

combined effect of the initiating events<br />

and all processes that cause and affect<br />

the outcome. Each of the initiating<br />

events and processes may be predictable.<br />

Their combined effect is usually<br />

considered less predictable. Uncertainty<br />

is determined to some degree by the<br />

type of and number of such processes<br />

involved.<br />

Project Risk Management is an established<br />

term in Norway and international<br />

and will most likely be so in time to<br />

come. However, I will argue the knowledge<br />

gained in risk management processes<br />

can effectively be employed in a<br />

Learning loop<br />

Opportuneties<br />

Risk<br />

Positiv<br />

Negative<br />

Positive<br />

Negative<br />

Sustainable competative advantage<br />

more holistic perspective of project and<br />

business enterprises to gain sustainable<br />

competitive advantages. The concept<br />

uncertainty management requires effective<br />

understanding of uncertainty.<br />

Efficient uncertainty management<br />

requires an effective process an effective<br />

process <strong>for</strong> sorting out which aspects of<br />

uncertainty need to be understood at<br />

deeper level than that currently available.<br />

In the figure below dynamic and<br />

complexity is illustrated in the same<br />

room as uncertainty, little research has<br />

been done in this area. Different strategies<br />

and success factors will be required<br />

in order to effectively manage projects<br />

within the level of tolerability and vulnerability<br />

that is acceptable to owners<br />

and stakeholders in general.<br />

Uncertainty management may prove<br />

valuable in this perspective.<br />

Leverage<br />

strategies<br />

Dynamic<br />

Trust worthy<br />

strategies<br />

Uncertainty<br />

•Ambiguity<br />

Precautionary<br />

strategies<br />

Complexity<br />

Success<br />

factors<br />

Risk based<br />

strategies<br />

Common notions of risk<br />

In everyday language, risk is used in<br />

different contexts. These either emphasize<br />

its negative connotation related to<br />

the possibility of undesirable outcomes<br />

or underline extra rewards that can be<br />

gained only at the price of uncertainty<br />

and possible loss. For example, Latin<br />

proverbs adopted in several languages<br />

relate risk to uncertainty (“do not buy<br />

a pig in a poke”) and possible loss<br />

(“gold may be bought to dear”), or<br />

define risk as a necessary condition of<br />

success (“nothing ventured, nothing<br />

gained”). Risk measures in the riskvalue<br />

models are consistent with the<br />

second meaning. They relate risk to the<br />

probability distribution of all outcomes.<br />

Since greater value and lower risk are<br />

more desirable, people choose risky<br />

options only if they also offer high<br />

expected returns.<br />

In contrast, the dictionary definitions of<br />

risk as a possibility of harm or other<br />

losses are in agreement with the first<br />

<strong>Prosjektledelse</strong> <strong>Nr</strong> 2-<strong>2003</strong> 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!