Rusta för fred (500 KB) Ladda ner - Svenska Freds
Rusta för fred (500 KB) Ladda ner - Svenska Freds
Rusta för fred (500 KB) Ladda ner - Svenska Freds
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Laila Freivalds<br />
Foreign Minister<br />
Sweden<br />
Fax +46-8-723 1176<br />
Geneva, 18 April 2005<br />
Dear Madam<br />
Hearing on Swedish arms trade regulation – April 22<br />
The International Peace Bureau – a worldwide network of over 250 peace organisations<br />
- has a long-standing concern regarding the European weapons<br />
trade. We understand that an important meeting will take place on April 22 to<br />
review the outcome of the recent Inquiry appointed by the government.<br />
We share the reactions of many in the Swedish civil society to the Inquiry proposals,<br />
which appear to open the way to a liberalisation of the previously<br />
rather strict rules. We therefore urge you to pay close attention to the following<br />
issues:<br />
1) Human security: The key priority when considering any revision of the<br />
situation should be the human security of civilians in conflict zones – ie the<br />
most vul<strong>ner</strong>able populations likely to be affected by the policy. This must<br />
take precedence over any potential economic gain at the domestic level.<br />
2) Human rights: The suggestion that the ge<strong>ner</strong>al ban on exports to countries<br />
where human rights are routinely violated in favour of a ‘materielspecific’<br />
approach is surely to soften the sanction against violator regimes.<br />
The international image of such regimes can be falsely ‘improved’ if they<br />
can claim to be clients of a respected state such as Sweden.<br />
3) Democracy: similarly it is alarming that the Swedish government would<br />
consider exporting arms to dictatorships. A government is judged not only<br />
by its actions, but also by its allies and customers. What would this say<br />
about Sweden?<br />
4) Development: while welcoming the introduction of a ‘poverty criterion’<br />
we are concerned at the vagueness of the term and the likelihood that it<br />
will have little practical applicability, especially when the customer state<br />
advances ‘national security’ arguments.<br />
The IPB has always admired the Swedish tradition of vigorous promotion of<br />
democracy, social justice and peace. We believe it would represent a serious<br />
break with that tradition if purely commercial considerations were to triumph<br />
over ethical imperatives. In fact we would urge the government to go further<br />
and give active support to the proposed Arms Trade Treaty, to which other EU<br />
states are now giving political endorsement.<br />
Yours sincerely<br />
Colin Archer<br />
Secretary-Ge<strong>ner</strong>al<br />
60