06.09.2013 Views

Rusta för fred (500 KB) Ladda ner - Svenska Freds

Rusta för fred (500 KB) Ladda ner - Svenska Freds

Rusta för fred (500 KB) Ladda ner - Svenska Freds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Laila Freivalds<br />

Foreign Minister<br />

Sweden<br />

Fax +46-8-723 1176<br />

Geneva, 18 April 2005<br />

Dear Madam<br />

Hearing on Swedish arms trade regulation – April 22<br />

The International Peace Bureau – a worldwide network of over 250 peace organisations<br />

- has a long-standing concern regarding the European weapons<br />

trade. We understand that an important meeting will take place on April 22 to<br />

review the outcome of the recent Inquiry appointed by the government.<br />

We share the reactions of many in the Swedish civil society to the Inquiry proposals,<br />

which appear to open the way to a liberalisation of the previously<br />

rather strict rules. We therefore urge you to pay close attention to the following<br />

issues:<br />

1) Human security: The key priority when considering any revision of the<br />

situation should be the human security of civilians in conflict zones – ie the<br />

most vul<strong>ner</strong>able populations likely to be affected by the policy. This must<br />

take precedence over any potential economic gain at the domestic level.<br />

2) Human rights: The suggestion that the ge<strong>ner</strong>al ban on exports to countries<br />

where human rights are routinely violated in favour of a ‘materielspecific’<br />

approach is surely to soften the sanction against violator regimes.<br />

The international image of such regimes can be falsely ‘improved’ if they<br />

can claim to be clients of a respected state such as Sweden.<br />

3) Democracy: similarly it is alarming that the Swedish government would<br />

consider exporting arms to dictatorships. A government is judged not only<br />

by its actions, but also by its allies and customers. What would this say<br />

about Sweden?<br />

4) Development: while welcoming the introduction of a ‘poverty criterion’<br />

we are concerned at the vagueness of the term and the likelihood that it<br />

will have little practical applicability, especially when the customer state<br />

advances ‘national security’ arguments.<br />

The IPB has always admired the Swedish tradition of vigorous promotion of<br />

democracy, social justice and peace. We believe it would represent a serious<br />

break with that tradition if purely commercial considerations were to triumph<br />

over ethical imperatives. In fact we would urge the government to go further<br />

and give active support to the proposed Arms Trade Treaty, to which other EU<br />

states are now giving political endorsement.<br />

Yours sincerely<br />

Colin Archer<br />

Secretary-Ge<strong>ner</strong>al<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!