Innovation-Gate-Process - Hochschule Ludwigshafen am Rhein
Innovation-Gate-Process - Hochschule Ludwigshafen am Rhein
Innovation-Gate-Process - Hochschule Ludwigshafen am Rhein
Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.
YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.
Vorlesung: Produkt- und <strong>Innovation</strong>smanagement<br />
Teil II: <strong>Innovation</strong>smanagement – Der <strong>Innovation</strong>-<strong>Gate</strong>-Prozess<br />
Net Present Value (NPV)<br />
Auszug aus: http://www.prioritysystem.com/glossary2.html#npv<br />
“After tax project cash flows occurring in future years are adjusted using an annual discount rate<br />
meant to represent the affect of time and risk on the project's value. Oftentimes, the discount rate<br />
is selected to be the organization's cost of capital, but it is more accurate to adjust the discount<br />
rate either upward or downward (e.g., as a "hurdle rate") according to the risk of the project.<br />
NPV has several limitations. One is the difficulty of identifying all of the impacts a project would<br />
have on organizational cash flows for future years. Also, by requiring that a single, nominal cash<br />
flow be identified for the project, NPV ignores uncertainty. Another problem is that it is not clear<br />
how the discount rate should be chosen. According to finance theory, the correct rate is the return<br />
available from investing in securities equivalent to the risk of the project being evaluated.<br />
Research on real options shows that the discount rate ought to be adjusted over time depending<br />
on how uncertainties are resolved and on the project management strategy. Using a constant<br />
discount rate for a project implicitly assumes that uncertainty increases over time in a specific way<br />
(geometrically). Ranking projects by NPV creates a bias toward short-term, quick payoff projects<br />
because it severely penalizes project benefits that occur in the more distant future. “<br />
46<br />
Prof. Dr. Manfred König