GeoBio-CenterLMU Bericht 2008/2009 - Ludwig-Maximilians ...
GeoBio-CenterLMU Bericht 2008/2009 - Ludwig-Maximilians ...
GeoBio-CenterLMU Bericht 2008/2009 - Ludwig-Maximilians ...
Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen
Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.
downstream fragment appears to bear adequate resolution (Erpenbeck et al.<br />
2006). Therefore, a concerted effort is now needed to evaluate the usefulness of<br />
DNA signature sequences for poriferan species discovery and description, and<br />
warrants comprehensive, phylum-wide coverage. Due to the fact that the highly<br />
conserved COI-barcoding primers are prone to amplify sponge commensals<br />
and/or symbionts, the primary task in the first phase of the project has been to<br />
optimize sponge-specific primer design. Additionally, to resolve closely related<br />
species, we will supplement the standard ca. 650 bp fragment with 440 bp of<br />
downstream sequence. The addition of an unlinked marker such as either rDNA<br />
ITS or the C2D2 region of the 28S rDNA gene might prove pivotal to accomplish<br />
the project’s aims. The second task will then be, after sufficient initial data have<br />
been gathered, to evaluate the potential of those DNA signature sequences<br />
for species distinction, i.e. the error rate associated with certain thresholds of<br />
genetic distances commonly used for species designation (see also Meyer and<br />
Paulay 2005, Hickerson et al. 2006). It is imaginable that once a sufficiently<br />
and densely covered reference system has been established and evaluated,<br />
identification of any given specimen, using the standard barcoding marker, at<br />
least to genus level should be possible. From there, species designation would<br />
be contingent on more variable signature sequences such as rDNA ITS or a<br />
fragment of the 28S rDNA. However, all this will take place in combination with<br />
conventional comparative morphology. Therefore, we will focus the initial phase<br />
of the SBP on appropriately identified and curated type specimens to build a<br />
taxonomically sound and solid backbone for a DNA sequence aided taxonomy.<br />
Samples will be obtained from associated partners e.g. the Queensland Muse-<br />
um in Brisbane/Australia, which provides 17,000 sponge for extraction, funded<br />
by the Marine Barcode of Life initiative (MarBol). All efforts will be undertaken<br />
to support developing countries in their efforts to produce DNA barcodes from<br />
specimens of their sponge fauna. Sequences and associated data (voucher<br />
and taxonomic information) will be made publicly available at the project’s da-<br />
tabase (see below) on its website (www.spongebarcoding.org) and submitted<br />
to the Barcode of Life Data Systems and Genbank/EMBL databases. Such a<br />
system could also enable a “reverse” taxonomic system, in that in large-scale<br />
biodiversity surveys, all collected samples are genotyped for DNA signature<br />
sequences, followed by pooling all specimens with identical or highly similar<br />
sequences. This will enable focused morphological work on distinct genetic<br />
lineages.<br />
The Sponge Barcoding Website (www.spongebarcoding.org)<br />
The Sponge Barcoding Database (SBD) is developed with the aim to function<br />
as the primary access point for DNA signature sequences together with provi-<br />
ding information on conventional morphological taxonomic characters to aid<br />
Kurzbericht<br />
20