01.03.2013 Views

these Open Championship Clubs choose to relief grind - Pitchcare

these Open Championship Clubs choose to relief grind - Pitchcare

these Open Championship Clubs choose to relief grind - Pitchcare

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Technical<br />

GIVEN much<br />

THOUGHT <strong>to</strong><br />

your RED<br />

DIESEL<br />

lately?<br />

The fact that the<br />

specification for red<br />

diesel (BS2869:A2 gas<br />

oil) changed significantly<br />

in January last year<br />

passed many people by,<br />

including, it has <strong>to</strong> be<br />

said, many regular users.<br />

This is not <strong>to</strong> say that<br />

regular users of red<br />

diesel aren’t experiencing<br />

problems or aren’t<br />

questioning the<br />

operability of their<br />

machinery - in fact, the<br />

reverse is true. So, what<br />

is going on, and what<br />

has changed?<br />

Neil Ryding, Managing<br />

Direc<strong>to</strong>r of FAST )<br />

Fuel Additive Science<br />

Technologies), explains<br />

The manufacturers of modern<br />

diesel engines, whether they be<br />

for on-road or off-road use, are<br />

coming under increasing pressure<br />

<strong>to</strong> comply with stringent timescales<br />

on emissions reduction from their<br />

engines. As a result, a huge amount of<br />

time and effort has been, and is being,<br />

devoted <strong>to</strong> the mechanical design of an<br />

engine and its exhaust system in order <strong>to</strong><br />

minimise noxious gaseous and<br />

particulate emissions. Consequently, ever<br />

tighter <strong>to</strong>lerances are being seen in the<br />

sophisticated fuel injection systems in an<br />

attempt <strong>to</strong> maximise combustion<br />

efficiency, and the inclusion of sensitive<br />

exhaust after treatment devices is now<br />

commonplace. So far, so good on the<br />

engine, but is the UK’s red diesel up <strong>to</strong><br />

the job? This question is important, as<br />

the vast majority of modern engines are<br />

calibrated <strong>to</strong> run on DERV – EN590.<br />

Evidence over the past 12 months<br />

suggests that many vehicles running on<br />

red diesel require a little ’help’ if they are<br />

<strong>to</strong> operate at optimum performance.<br />

Fuel<br />

Since the start of 2011, in order <strong>to</strong> help<br />

with the performance of catalyst-based<br />

exhaust treatments, and via an EU Fuel<br />

Quality Directive, the maximum sulphur<br />

content of red diesel for mobile non-road<br />

engines (i.e. trac<strong>to</strong>rs, backhoes etc) was<br />

cut by a fac<strong>to</strong>r of 100 (<strong>to</strong> 20ppm at the<br />

point of delivery) whilst, simultaneously,<br />

the maximum biodiesel content can now<br />

rise <strong>to</strong> 7% by volume. The cetane<br />

number was unchanged at 45, but this is<br />

also critical.<br />

What Does This Mean for the End-<br />

User?<br />

Lowering the sulphur content of a fuel is<br />

nothing new: road diesel and petrol<br />

jumped this hurdle without much<br />

problem some time ago. Talking sulphur<br />

out, however, does reduce the ‘oilyness’<br />

of fuel – its natural lubricating properties<br />

- as during the removal process some<br />

extremely useful lubricating<br />

hydrocarbons are also lost. This matters,<br />

as a lower fuel ‘lubricity’ results in<br />

excessive or premature wear in the very<br />

close-<strong>to</strong>lerance parts of common-rail<br />

injection pumps and injec<strong>to</strong>rs. The<br />

current specification does counter this by<br />

specifying a lubricity measure, and fuel<br />

supplied <strong>to</strong> this specification should, of<br />

course, cause no problems. Note that<br />

fuels substantially exceeding this<br />

minimum lubricity specification can<br />

benefit from improved fuel economy.<br />

The second change affecting the<br />

maximum biodiesel content is potentially<br />

the more questionable. At a maximum<br />

7% by volume, it is now equivalent <strong>to</strong> the<br />

DERV specification. Whilst more<br />

biodiesel in the fuel does increase its<br />

lubricity, it does have a number of<br />

downsides, including:<br />

• a much-increased water pick-up<br />

potential, leading <strong>to</strong> a decrease in<br />

FEBRUARY/MARCH 2012 PC 119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!