- Page 1 and 2: THE DAMAGED MALE AND THE CONTEMPORA
- Page 3 and 4: ABSTRACT This thesis is about the d
- Page 5 and 6: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thank you to my sup
- Page 7 and 8: Three Kings: Reverse Colonisation a
- Page 9 and 10: INTRODUCTION “What studied tormen
- Page 11 and 12: ethics in film spectatorship studie
- Page 13 and 14: Later on in my introduction, many o
- Page 15 and 16: delineates a precise historical mom
- Page 17 and 18: The product of this seems to be a n
- Page 19 and 20: performance. Of course, the reverse
- Page 21 and 22: film characters overtly performing
- Page 23: Therefore, in this thesis, the dama
- Page 27 and 28: war film. Part of this rendering in
- Page 29 and 30: spectator an experience of suddenly
- Page 31 and 32: elligerent US exceptionalism, the a
- Page 33 and 34: developing around the fantasies att
- Page 35 and 36: It is observed that the historical
- Page 37 and 38: and exploring the victim/victimiser
- Page 39 and 40: emotional engagement with the narra
- Page 41 and 42: horror and pain) and the concurrent
- Page 43 and 44: masochistic spectatorship of catast
- Page 45 and 46: of traumatic events must mean there
- Page 47 and 48: trauma and images of ruination, suc
- Page 49 and 50: say that an ethical form of spectat
- Page 51 and 52: the ethics of spectatorship in the
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter One will principally consid
- Page 55 and 56: equired for the perpetuation of the
- Page 57 and 58: inactive contemporary spectator. I
- Page 59 and 60: narration. There is, however, one c
- Page 61 and 62: plausible diegetic realms, we have
- Page 63 and 64: like ghostly video-game characters
- Page 65 and 66: construction of the ‘reality’ o
- Page 67 and 68: of the film, much like Jacob’s La
- Page 69 and 70: statements is that ‘the spectator
- Page 71 and 72: There is one scene in particular wh
- Page 73 and 74: words, normative hegemonic masculin
- Page 75 and 76:
expressed as white male victimizati
- Page 77 and 78:
We Were Soldiers carefully establis
- Page 79 and 80:
‘masochistic narrative’ in the
- Page 81 and 82:
outside of the normative arenas and
- Page 83 and 84:
privileged function gets handed ove
- Page 85 and 86:
The character of Jack Starks experi
- Page 87 and 88:
projection of culpability onto fema
- Page 89 and 90:
conditions of masochism’s incepti
- Page 91 and 92:
an ‘antidote’ to ‘the ladder
- Page 93 and 94:
“assaulted” or even “damaged
- Page 95 and 96:
pleasures from the stylistics of Sp
- Page 97 and 98:
einforcement of self-same dominion
- Page 99 and 100:
CHAPTER TWO: BLANKNESS AND BLACKNES
- Page 101 and 102:
male victim trope in contemporary w
- Page 103 and 104:
The notion of a mono-cultural US is
- Page 105 and 106:
In most respects whiteness is const
- Page 107 and 108:
‘Western’ world in general (chi
- Page 109 and 110:
politics of ethnic and racial ident
- Page 111 and 112:
damaged male, black masculinity is
- Page 113 and 114:
anxiously searches for (and fails t
- Page 115 and 116:
the successful visual fulfilment of
- Page 117 and 118:
instigated the idea of mutiny, crac
- Page 119 and 120:
mobile camera positions embodying c
- Page 121 and 122:
esistant, all the things a discipli
- Page 123 and 124:
consume Monfriez’s fantasies sugg
- Page 125 and 126:
analysis of Monfriez in this sequen
- Page 127 and 128:
as the central, factual, organising
- Page 129 and 130:
although ending in a diegetic realm
- Page 131 and 132:
with Michael Jackson? […] A black
- Page 133 and 134:
around his mouth and face. We also
- Page 135 and 136:
airport), but also assists in lendi
- Page 137 and 138:
fetishize the technological intimac
- Page 139 and 140:
of destruction, and perhaps assists
- Page 141 and 142:
So, we have seen in three Hollywood
- Page 143 and 144:
depiction of the falsified events.
- Page 145 and 146:
pain. In Three Kings this is the to
- Page 147 and 148:
spectatorship only flourishes in th
- Page 149 and 150:
point of explosion” shows that an
- Page 151 and 152:
CHAPTER THREE: NEO-IMPERIALISM AND
- Page 153 and 154:
In Chapter One I defined masochisti
- Page 155 and 156:
destruction, and regeneration. Smit
- Page 157 and 158:
occupation, and movement through sc
- Page 159 and 160:
spectatorial pleasures in regarding
- Page 161 and 162:
This serves to secure US military p
- Page 163 and 164:
The heat seeking camera evacuates t
- Page 165 and 166:
In Smith’s standard trajectory of
- Page 167 and 168:
must be found. They saw everything,
- Page 169 and 170:
Lines, we obviously have Burnett st
- Page 171 and 172:
I have explained above the fact tha
- Page 173 and 174:
throughout the film? The answer to
- Page 175 and 176:
The displacements, including the tr
- Page 177 and 178:
of the US characters, wheareas orga
- Page 179 and 180:
mobile camera, informal framing) it
- Page 181 and 182:
superficial affective level. The re
- Page 183 and 184:
ounds of machine gun fire that are
- Page 185 and 186:
As Savran points out, Shepard empha
- Page 187 and 188:
threats to the white domestic, the
- Page 189 and 190:
ather than exposition of military t
- Page 191 and 192:
that exemplify this moral code bein
- Page 193 and 194:
mountainous terrain therefore obscu
- Page 195 and 196:
forget four enabling myths that the
- Page 197 and 198:
access to, and obfuscation of, batt
- Page 199 and 200:
image of victimhood. This allows th
- Page 201 and 202:
CHAPTER FOUR: THE GUILT ZONE; LOOKI
- Page 203 and 204:
aftermath of 9/11, ‘who Americans
- Page 205 and 206:
case in so many films (and in visua
- Page 207 and 208:
indulgence wrapped up in the positi
- Page 209 and 210:
The narrative intention of this sce
- Page 211 and 212:
that drive (through modernist techn
- Page 213 and 214:
Stewart places contemporary war fil
- Page 215 and 216:
The theme of surveillance, omniscie
- Page 217 and 218:
omniscience and powerlessness, fore
- Page 219 and 220:
egarding the new military strategy
- Page 221 and 222:
consistently at the mercy of this i
- Page 223 and 224:
the courageous, small underdog. As
- Page 225 and 226:
We are, as spectators, impelled int
- Page 227 and 228:
fuzz of black and grey. Through thi
- Page 229 and 230:
impression one leaves this scene wi
- Page 231 and 232:
unavailable on Region 2 DVD. Roger
- Page 233 and 234:
film consists of pastiches of numer
- Page 235 and 236:
designed to enable a multitude of i
- Page 237 and 238:
scene then, that Salazar’s role a
- Page 239 and 240:
aggressive sadistic regime is equat
- Page 241 and 242:
altericide, a casting out of the
- Page 243 and 244:
characters, and no attempt is made
- Page 245 and 246:
Qasim Hamza al-Janabi. Libby Saxton
- Page 247 and 248:
We can see that war on terror films
- Page 249 and 250:
fantasies of omnipotence’, 315 an
- Page 251 and 252:
asserts that ‘cinema and videogra
- Page 253 and 254:
authoritarian films is also the spe
- Page 255 and 256:
abject pleasures of witnessing suff
- Page 257 and 258:
gaps, just unadulterated confrontat
- Page 259 and 260:
in the veils of liberal moral hand-
- Page 261 and 262:
CONCLUSION All the films in this th
- Page 263 and 264:
More recent films, such as Redacted
- Page 265 and 266:
“indiewood” films succeeding at
- Page 267 and 268:
drawn into his emotive desire for v
- Page 269 and 270:
with his subsequent victimhood figu
- Page 271 and 272:
Kelly’s Heroes. Dir. Brian G. Hut
- Page 273 and 274:
BIBLIOGRAPHY Aaron, Michele. Specta
- Page 275 and 276:
Dixon, Wheeler Winston. “Twenty-f
- Page 277 and 278:
Kaplan, Amy. The Anarchy of Empire
- Page 279 and 280:
Pearl, Monica. “The City of Broth
- Page 281 and 282:
Sturken, Marita. Tourists of Histor