27.03.2013 Views

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

spectator positions, taking undoubtedly a degree of visual pleasure from <strong>the</strong> process of<br />

watching <strong>the</strong> visceral horrors of <strong>war</strong> <strong>film</strong>s. In a sense, we adopt a punished, vicitimised, even<br />

assaulted subject position through bearing witness to traumatic scenes of violence <strong>and</strong><br />

carnage, but we remain safely distanced <strong>and</strong> can disavow our implication in <strong>the</strong> cinematic<br />

happenings <strong>the</strong> more extreme <strong>the</strong>y are; i.e. it bears no relation to <strong>the</strong> perceivable reality we<br />

encounter on a daily basis. So, <strong>contemporary</strong> <strong>war</strong> cinema’s viewing pleasures reside in <strong>the</strong><br />

anxieties it provokes, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>se pleasures are as much reactive <strong>and</strong> status quo affirming as<br />

transgressive. The short-term affects of <strong>contemporary</strong> <strong>war</strong> <strong>film</strong> spectatorship are fluid <strong>and</strong><br />

radical in terms of producing a dynamic sense of shattering <strong>and</strong> self-ab<strong>and</strong>onment in <strong>the</strong><br />

spectator, but long-term, in Hollywood, transformation <strong>and</strong> transgression are a rarity. For<br />

example, <strong>the</strong> visceral terrors of a <strong>film</strong> such as Saving Private Ryan can fix <strong>the</strong> spectator as<br />

victimized, which is hardly a radical position. In negotiating <strong>the</strong> effects of trauma,<br />

<strong>contemporary</strong> <strong>war</strong> <strong>film</strong>s betray <strong>the</strong> radical political potentials of masochistic subject positions<br />

for <strong>the</strong> compelling reactive power of causation <strong>and</strong> narrative. This is an almost hysterical<br />

desire for fixed identities, something which is not easily obtainable in a <strong>war</strong> <strong>film</strong>.<br />

So what do <strong>the</strong>se safeties, pleasures, <strong>and</strong> emotional entanglements with <strong>contemporary</strong> <strong>war</strong><br />

<strong>film</strong>s mean for us as spectators? We have already seen how spectatorship of <strong>contemporary</strong><br />

<strong>war</strong> <strong>film</strong> may be considered masochistic, <strong>and</strong> to what ideological uses this spectatorial mode<br />

may be put. This <strong>the</strong>sis, however, builds to<strong>war</strong>ds an analysis of <strong>the</strong> spectatorship of<br />

<strong>contemporary</strong> <strong>war</strong> <strong>film</strong>s in <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>the</strong> emergent field of ethics <strong>and</strong> <strong>film</strong> studies. The<br />

trajectory that my chapters describe shows a movement from <strong>the</strong> spectator being<br />

overwhelmingly figured as masochistic, to one where <strong>the</strong> ethical considerations behind<br />

looking on at fictional depictions of US military violence is <strong>the</strong> main concern. This is not to<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!