27.03.2013 Views

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

according to E. Ann Kaplan, consists of cut-up narration, emphasis on circularity, paralysis,<br />

<strong>and</strong> repetition. 54 These elements assist in conveying <strong>the</strong> experiential sensations of <strong>the</strong><br />

traumatized subject, a subjectivity typified by belatedness, latency, repetition compulsion, <strong>and</strong><br />

visceral imaginative re-enactments of traumatic experiences. 55 It <strong>the</strong>refore literalizes some<br />

aspects of non-representable trauma. Crucially, Kaplan also declares that in trauma cinema,<br />

‘images erupt into cinematic space’ <strong>and</strong> that ‘<strong>the</strong> struggle to figure trauma’s effects<br />

cinematically leads to means o<strong>the</strong>r than linearity or story’ (for example, flashbacks.) 56<br />

But let us turn specifically to how trauma cinema has been <strong>the</strong>orized, with particular emphasis<br />

on how this is applicable to <strong>contemporary</strong> <strong>war</strong> cinema. Film criticism emerging in response to<br />

Holocaust documentaries <strong>and</strong> <strong>film</strong>s can provide us with <strong>the</strong>oretical in-roads for dealing with<br />

<strong>the</strong> very different traumas of fictional <strong>war</strong> <strong>film</strong>s. Joshua Hirsch asserts that ‘cinema<br />

constitutes a kind of witnessing to both <strong>the</strong> outer physical reality of historical events <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

inner, psychological reality of <strong>the</strong> effects of those events on people’ 57 , <strong>and</strong> as such, historical<br />

<strong>film</strong>s ‘embody a contradiction within historical consciousness.’ 58 He has also stated that<br />

‘cinema constitutes a kind of witnessing to both <strong>the</strong> outer, physical reality of historical events<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> inner, psychological reality of <strong>the</strong> effects of those events on people.’ 59 Additionally,<br />

he outlines <strong>the</strong> notion of exogenous (caused by external forces, e.g. <strong>war</strong>) <strong>and</strong> endogenous<br />

(caused by internal processes e.g. fantasies) trauma. 60 It is argued that what is broadly (<strong>and</strong><br />

debatably) named ‘posttraumatic cinema’ 61 is an attempt ‘to formally reproduce for <strong>the</strong><br />

54 E. Anne Kaplan, “Melodrama, Cinema, <strong>and</strong> Trauma.” Screen 42.2 (2001), 201-205<br />

55 Cathy Caruth, ‘Trauma <strong>and</strong> Experience’ in Trauma: Explorations in Memory ed. Cathy Caruth (Baltimore <strong>and</strong><br />

London: John Hopkins University Press, 1995), 2-10<br />

56 Kaplan, “Melodrama, Cinema, <strong>and</strong> Trauma”, 204<br />

57 Joshua Hirsch, After Image: Film, Trauma <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holocaust (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2004), 6<br />

58 Ibid.<br />

59 Ibid., 6<br />

60 Ibid., 8<br />

61 I prefer <strong>the</strong> simpler term ‘trauma cinema’<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!