27.03.2013 Views

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

So far, we have <strong>the</strong> essential elements of masochistic aes<strong>the</strong>tics delineated as <strong>the</strong> performance<br />

of pain, <strong>the</strong> portrayal of a suspenseful moment before <strong>the</strong> infliction of violence, <strong>the</strong><br />

fetishization of <strong>the</strong> accoutrements of <strong>the</strong> masochistic scenario, <strong>and</strong> a crucial self-regard in<br />

bearing witness to <strong>the</strong> victim’s own victimized status. It is useful at this point to bring in<br />

Steven Shaviro’s <strong>the</strong>ories of masochism <strong>and</strong> <strong>film</strong> studies in order to flesh out our conception<br />

of masochistic aes<strong>the</strong>tics.<br />

In discussing Fassbinder’s Querelle, 89 he argues that ‘we are seduced <strong>and</strong> initiated into <strong>the</strong><br />

secret pleasures of abjection.’ 90 The point is that masochism is not analogous to abjection, but,<br />

according to Shaviro, its stylistics, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> masochistic scene, makes abjection curiously<br />

pleasurable. This pleasure is due to <strong>the</strong> tactile qualities of <strong>the</strong> <strong>film</strong>s. By this, what is meant is<br />

that in our visual interaction with <strong>the</strong> <strong>film</strong>, our consumption of <strong>the</strong> image <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> narrative is<br />

rendered pleasurable by our intimate connection to <strong>the</strong> affective, emotive pleasures of<br />

revelling in <strong>the</strong> intimate details of <strong>the</strong> mise-en-scene, editing, <strong>and</strong> sound design. The pleasures<br />

offered up by this affective corporeal response to spine-tingling sounds, compelling images,<br />

<strong>and</strong> satisfying spatial configurations make <strong>the</strong> aes<strong>the</strong>tics of masochism gratifying, hence our<br />

‘seduction’ into it.<br />

Obviously, this is a radically passionate account of <strong>the</strong> textual <strong>and</strong> visual pleasures of cinema,<br />

<strong>and</strong> is one that is very personal to Shaviro, who describes his specific reactions to <strong>film</strong>s <strong>and</strong><br />

his revelling in <strong>the</strong>ir details as part of his philosophical intervention into Deleuzian<br />

masochism. However, it is still useful in examining <strong>the</strong> stylistics of <strong>contemporary</strong> <strong>war</strong> <strong>film</strong>s<br />

89 A differentiation is required here; Querelle’s abjection is rooted in gay <strong>male</strong> sex, scatology, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

eroticisation of corporeal waste, whereas in <strong>the</strong> <strong>film</strong>s under discussion in this <strong>the</strong>sis, <strong>the</strong> abjection on display is<br />

located in <strong>the</strong> destruction of <strong>male</strong> bodies, nightmare sequences, <strong>and</strong> traumatic memory.<br />

90 Shaviro, The Cinematic Body, 197<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!