27.03.2013 Views

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Returning to Studlar, she discusses <strong>the</strong> ‘primal scene’ which <strong>the</strong> infant must bear witness to,<br />

like ‘Ulysses tied to <strong>the</strong> mast or Tantalus on whom is imposed <strong>the</strong> spectacle of parental<br />

intercourse’, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore posits masochistic subjectivity as bound up with spectacle, desire<br />

<strong>and</strong> fantasy. 103 Studlar also confirms a <strong>the</strong>me revisited many times already; that ‘masochistic<br />

desire depends on suspension to guarantee a pain/pleasure structure’ <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />

requirement to restrain desire <strong>and</strong> ‘suspend consummation.’ 104 She goes on to draw<br />

comparisons with <strong>the</strong> masochistic subject position <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> location of <strong>the</strong> cinematic spectator,<br />

declaring that<br />

Like <strong>the</strong> masochist, <strong>the</strong> spectator must avoid <strong>the</strong> orgasmic release that destroys <strong>the</strong><br />

boundaries of disavowal, takes him/her outside <strong>the</strong> limits of normal spectatorship <strong>and</strong><br />

into <strong>the</strong> realm of <strong>the</strong> voyeur, <strong>and</strong> disrupts <strong>the</strong> magical thinking that defines <strong>the</strong><br />

infantile use of <strong>the</strong> cinematic object. 105<br />

Therefore, we can see through Studlar’s model of masochistic spectatorship that ‘<strong>the</strong> formal<br />

structures of masochism overlap with <strong>the</strong> psychological mechanisms that are implicated in <strong>the</strong><br />

cinematic apparatus’, namely, disavowal, fetishism, fantasy, <strong>and</strong> voyeurism/scopophilia. 106<br />

But <strong>the</strong>re is more to it than this, <strong>and</strong> what is more, it specifically relates to <strong>the</strong> <strong>contemporary</strong><br />

<strong>war</strong> <strong>film</strong>. War <strong>film</strong>s depend on scenes of carnage <strong>and</strong> traumatic events for <strong>the</strong>ir narrative<br />

impact, <strong>the</strong>y also deal with historical events, <strong>and</strong> to an extent channel historical trauma. Also,<br />

as is <strong>the</strong> case with horror <strong>film</strong>s, spectators wish to constantly repeat <strong>the</strong>se scenarios of trauma,<br />

carnage <strong>and</strong> violence <strong>and</strong> so <strong>the</strong>re exists a certain repetition compulsion when it comes to<br />

traumatic events, <strong>and</strong> hence cinema ‘makes available <strong>the</strong> pleasure of loss, suffering, <strong>and</strong><br />

submission’ (although this obviously doesn’t have to just refer to <strong>war</strong> <strong>and</strong> horror <strong>film</strong>s, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

are still many losses <strong>and</strong> instances of suffering in melodramas, for example). 107 This repetition<br />

103 Gaylyn Studlar, In The Realm of Pleasure: Von Sternberg, Dietrich <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Masochistic Aes<strong>the</strong>tic (New<br />

York: Columbia University Press, 1988), 221<br />

104 Ibid., 27<br />

105 Ibid.<br />

106 Ibid., 178<br />

107 Ibid., 182<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!