27.03.2013 Views

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Downing <strong>and</strong> Saxton have pointed out that ‘ethics designates a way of responding to <strong>the</strong><br />

encounter between self <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, while suspending <strong>the</strong> meaning of <strong>the</strong> subject-object<br />

relation, with its implicit dynamic of dominance <strong>and</strong> subordination’. 118 So ethical<br />

spectatorship depends on much more than emotional engagement, it is an embodied response<br />

that articulates a reflexive desire to expose <strong>the</strong> power dynamics that structure our relationship<br />

to <strong>film</strong>. It is also about revealing <strong>the</strong> previously sublimated connections between <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> self in order to turn away from representational domination, control <strong>and</strong> hierarchical<br />

modes of structuring spectatorial response <strong>and</strong> pleasure. In this respect, many critics studying<br />

<strong>film</strong> <strong>and</strong> ethics find <strong>the</strong> work of <strong>the</strong> philosopher Emmanuel Levinas useful. Sarah Cooper, in<br />

discussing Levinas’s idea of ethics, states that it is, ‘a primordial relation, obligation <strong>and</strong><br />

responsibility to o<strong>the</strong>rs on <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> self’. 119 So <strong>the</strong> conception of ethics deployed here,<br />

which requires communication <strong>and</strong> encounter with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, is one in which <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r is<br />

strictly identified as <strong>the</strong> defining factor in one’s culpability <strong>and</strong> responsibility as a citizen<br />

possessing social agency. It is our connection to o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> how we acknowledge <strong>the</strong>se<br />

connections that determine our ethical responsibility for <strong>the</strong>se o<strong>the</strong>rs. Cooper goes on to<br />

delineate that ‘<strong>the</strong> way in which <strong>the</strong> encounter with alterity is figured in his thinking is<br />

primarily through his notion of <strong>the</strong> visage (face)’ <strong>and</strong> so <strong>the</strong>refore it is in ‘<strong>the</strong> face-to-face<br />

encounter between self <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r’ that Levinas’s ethics ‘challenge <strong>the</strong> sovereignty of <strong>the</strong> self,<br />

which is constituted by being thrown into question by alterity’. 120 For Levinas, <strong>the</strong> relationship<br />

between self <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r is key, <strong>and</strong> it is specifically within <strong>the</strong> encounter with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r that<br />

one can become thrown into a state of ontological crisis. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> absolutism of <strong>the</strong><br />

self is replaced by recognition of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. This manoeuvre exposes <strong>the</strong> interplays of<br />

subordination, submission, dominance <strong>and</strong> control that inform social relations. Accordingly,<br />

118 Ibid.<br />

119 Sarah Cooper, Selfless Cinema? Ethics <strong>and</strong> French Documentary (London: Legenda, 2006), 5<br />

120 Ibid.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!