27.03.2013 Views

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

the damaged male and the contemporary american war film

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

same time reveals to deeper analysis, ‘expressions of revenge, of rebellion, <strong>and</strong> of triumph.’ 73<br />

All of <strong>the</strong>se emotions <strong>and</strong> tropes are common in dramatic textual forms, but <strong>the</strong> idea of <strong>the</strong><br />

pleasurable spectacular consumption of pain is compelling in <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>contemporary</strong> <strong>war</strong><br />

cinema. The performance of wounding <strong>and</strong> pain, be it physical or psychological, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

transformation of bodies into objects of violence, is central to <strong>war</strong> <strong>film</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> hence <strong>the</strong><br />

masochistic pleasures to be accessed in this context are worth investigating.<br />

By far <strong>the</strong> most profoundly influential work on masochism within <strong>film</strong> <strong>and</strong> cultural studies is<br />

Gilles Deleuze’s Masochism: Coldness <strong>and</strong> Cruelty. His primary contribution was to reject<br />

<strong>the</strong> notion of any link between sadism <strong>and</strong> masochism, stating that <strong>the</strong> one inflicting <strong>the</strong> pain<br />

in a masochistic beating scene is not a sadist, <strong>and</strong> instead <strong>the</strong>y are just a component of <strong>the</strong><br />

masochistic scenario. 74 Also, crucially, <strong>the</strong> Deleuzian masochistic model states that power <strong>and</strong><br />

agency is deferred <strong>and</strong> displaced onto exterior objects. 75 For Deleuze, death is associated with<br />

<strong>the</strong> figure of <strong>the</strong> ‘cold, oral mo<strong>the</strong>r’, 76 <strong>and</strong> is a condition of <strong>the</strong> formulation of masochistic<br />

subjectivity, since it signals <strong>the</strong> belittling <strong>and</strong> expulsion of paternal power. This marks <strong>the</strong><br />

primacy of maternal power which is figured as ambivalent in that it brings both pleasure <strong>and</strong><br />

pain. 77 In <strong>the</strong> most radical re-write of Freudian notions of masochism, Deleuze makes it clear<br />

that he does not believe <strong>the</strong> fantasy revolves around ‘a child being beaten’, but ra<strong>the</strong>r ‘it is not<br />

a child, but a fa<strong>the</strong>r that is being beaten’ 78 <strong>and</strong> hence masochism rests on a ‘double<br />

disavowal’; one that idealises <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> ‘a disavowal of <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r who is expelled from<br />

<strong>the</strong> symbolic order’. 79 Hence, once again we can see oppositions <strong>and</strong> contradictions<br />

73 Ibid., 145<br />

74 Gilles Deleuze, Masochism: Coldness <strong>and</strong> Cruelty (New York: Zone Books, 1991), 42-3<br />

75 Ibid., 105<br />

76 Ibid., 55<br />

77 Gaylyn Studlar, “Masochism <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Perverse Pleasures of <strong>the</strong> Cinema,” Movies <strong>and</strong> Methods: Volume Two,<br />

ed. Bill Nichols, (Berkeley <strong>and</strong> Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1985), 606<br />

78 Deleuze, Masochism, 66<br />

79 Ibid., 68<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!