Marketed Surplus and Post-harvest Losses of Jowar - Agmarknet

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CHAPTER – II REVIEW OF LITERATURE 2.1 The DMI has been engaged in conducting agricultural marketing surveys since its inception in the year 1935. The commodity survey reports brought forth background of commodity marketing, the problems and remedial measures required to overcome the same. These reports provided information on marketable surplus ratios, which were utilised by the Department of Statistics, Ministry of Planning, in framing estimates of ‘Net National Product’ and by Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion for assigning weights to different agricultural commodities in compilation of “All India index numbers of wholesale prices”. The marketable surplus ratios in respect of foodgrains and sources are indicated below: S.N o. TABLE NO. 1 MARKETABLE SURPLUS RATIOS OF FOODGRAIN CROPS Commodit y Marketable surplus ratio (Percentage ) Year of which data relates 1. Rice 32.2 Market Report 1951 2. Wheat 37.8 Marketing Report1957-58 & 1958-59 3. Jowar 29.6 N.A. 4. Bajra 27.2 N.A 5. Barley 28.0 N.A. 6. Maize 38.5 N.A. 7. Ragi 18.2 N.A. 8. Gram 45.2 N.A. 9. Arhar 62.4 Marketing Report 1956-57 10. Urad 63.5 - 11. Masoor 28.8 - 12. Moong 60.7 - Source: Directorate of Economics & Statistics U.O. No. 8-8/76-AWPT-ES dated 22.11.1976. 2.2 In view of the persistent demand from user organisations, another National survey was undertaken by the DMI during 1972-73 in respect of Paddy, Wheat, Jowar, Bajra and Maize. The marketable surplus ratios obtained therein are furnished below:
S . N o . 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . TABLE NO. 2 MARKETABLE SURPLUS RATIOS OF SELECTED CEREALS Commodity Marketable surplus ratio (Percentage) Year of reference Paddy 1 8.87 1972-73 1979 Wheat 2 65.10 1973-74 1986 Jowar 3 33.14 1974-75 1984 Bajra 4 36.31 1974-75 1985 Maize 5 30.86 1974-75 1987 Year of publication of report 2.3 This apart, micro studies are being undertaken in the Agricultural Universities and Research Institutes. Some of these findings with regard to marketable surplus & post harvest losses are furnished below : • The World Bank Operations Evaluation Study of (1974-85) 7 reported the storage losses of Sorghum and Millet as 4% in Nigeria and 1.7% in Malavi. • Khadse, et al. 8 studied the marketable surplus of kharif jowar in Vidarbha Region of Maharashtra and reported the marketable surplus of 7.22% in small category, 22.79% in medium category, 42.66% in large category and 29.77% as overall average. The study further concluded that the production of jowar, marketable surplus and marketed surplus were having positive relationship with the size of holdings. Whereas the retentions for kind payment and home consumption were having negative relationship with the size of holding. In small and medium size holdings, the distress sale was found. They further concluded, “the major factor governing marketable surplus was being production and that home consumption and kind payment were responsible to reduce the marketable surplus of jowar in the area studied”. It may be mentioned here that jowar is a major staple food in the area of study conducted by the researchers. • Pawar P.P. et al. (1990) 9 reported that the marketable surplus of jowar was positively related to size of holdings in Marathwada region of Maharashtra. The study concludes that the distress sale of both rabi and kharif crop was found in case of small cultivators due to their urgent needs of cash requirements. This is in conformity with the conclusions of the Khadse et.al. as indicated above.
Page 1 and 2: MARKETABLE SURPLUS AND POST HARVEST
Page 3 and 4: Annexure No. Content LIST OF ANNEXU
Page 5 and 6: XXXVI Losses of Jowar in Transport
Page 7 and 8: Table No. Content LIST OF TABLES 1.
Page 9 and 10: 32. Utilisation of Jowar for Paymen
Page 11 and 12: SUMMARY 1. In view of the persisten
Page 13: CHAPTER - I INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Di
Page 17 and 18: 3.1 SAMPLING DESIGN : CHAPTER - III
Page 19 and 20: TALBE NO. 3 DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE
Page 21 and 22: CHAPTER-IV ESTIMATION PROCEDURE Let
Page 23 and 24: X ˆ hih′jk = -------- Σ Yhih′
Page 25 and 26: TABLE NO. 6 STATE-WISE AREA UNDER J
Page 27 and 28: TABLE NO. 8 STATE-WISE DISTRIBUTION
Page 29 and 30: 7 Haryana 36.07 2.61 0.02 0.00 36.0
Page 31 and 32: 6.1 Jowar is retained for CHAPTER -
Page 33 and 34: TABLE NO. 15 RETENTION BY THE FARM
Page 35 and 36: Retention of Jowar by Farm Family F
Page 37 and 38: 15 Meghalaya 0.00 0.00 0.00 16 Mizo
Page 39 and 40: 21 Sikkim 0.00 0.00 0.00 22 Tamil N
Page 41 and 42: It is observed that the States to b
Page 43 and 44: 6.8 RETENTION OF JOWAR FOR ANIMAL F
Page 45 and 46: TABLE NO. 28 UTILISATION OF JOWAR F
Page 47 and 48: TABLE NO. 30 UTILISATION OF JOWAR T
Page 49 and 50: TABLE NO. 32. UTILISATION OF JOWAR
Page 51 and 52: 25 West Bengal 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER - VII POST HARVEST LOSSES O
Page 55 and 56: Losses of Jowar During Storage and
Page 57 and 58: 579.95(13.71%) Total Sale of Jowar
Page 59 and 60: TABLE NO. 35 SALES OF JOWAR (AVERAG
Page 61 and 62: TABLE NO. 36 SALES TO VARIOUS AGENC
Page 63 and 64: It was observed that out of the tot
Page 65 and 66:
TABLE NO. 40 CONTRIBUTION OF STATES
Page 67 and 68:
MARKETABLE SURPLUS CHAPTER IX 9.1 I
Page 69 and 70:
Quantity 12000.00 10000.00 8000.00
Page 71 and 72:
Annexure - I Area under Jowar - Irr
Page 73 and 74:
S.No 26 ALL INDIA 3157.68 1846.88 5
Page 75 and 76:
19 Punjab 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 77 and 78:
13 Maharashtra 0.00 0.00 3.74 0.23
Page 79 and 80:
7 Haryana 0.32 8.00 0.12 6.32 2.05
Page 81 and 82:
1 Andhra Pradesh 183.45 57.00 39.82
Page 83 and 84:
25 West Bengal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 85 and 86:
20 Rajasthan 5.48 2.70 1.07 2.53 2.
Page 87 and 88:
14 Manipur 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 89 and 90:
8 Himachal Pradesh 0.00 0.00 0.00 0
Page 91 and 92:
3 Assam 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.
Page 93 and 94:
23 Tripura 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 95 and 96:
18 Orissa 0.32 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 97 and 98:
12 Madhya Pradesh 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.
Page 99 and 100:
S.No. 7 Haryana 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 101 and 102:
Annexure - XXVII Utilisation of Jow
Page 103 and 104:
21 Sikkim 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 105 and 106:
15 Meghalaya 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.
Page 107 and 108:
9 Jammu and Kashmir 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 109 and 110:
3 Assam 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.
Page 111 and 112:
S.No 19 Punjab 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 113 and 114:
10 Karnataka 8.30 0.53 1.51 0.10 0.
Page 115 and 116:
5 Goa 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 117 and 118:
Annexure - XXXXI Total Post Harvest
Page 119 and 120:
18 Orissa 0.01 0.26 0.02 0.52 0.01
Page 121 and 122:
12 Madhya Pradesh 3.81 0.48 3.39 0.
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Annexure - XXXXVIII Total Sale of J
Page 127 and 128:
19 Punjab 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 129 and 130:
13 Maharashtra 63.01 7.71 671.86 82
Page 131 and 132:
7 Haryana 0.00 0.00 0.29 7.25 0.12
Page 133 and 134:
Annexure - LV Sale of Jowar - Withi
Page 135 and 136:
22 Tamil Nadu 0.21 0.07 66.60 21.02
Page 137 and 138:
16 Mizoram 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 139 and 140:
12 Madhya Pradesh 1.34 0.17 202.74
Page 141 and 142:
7 Haryana 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.37
Page 143 and 144:
1 Andhra Pradesh 22.06 21.69 0.00 0
Page 145 and 146:
21 Sikkim 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 147 and 148:
15 Meghalaya 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
3 Assam 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.
Page 153 and 154:
25 West Bengal 0.12 0.12 100.00 0.0
Page 155 and 156:
REFERENCES 1. Marketable Surplus &
Page 157 and 158:
9) Dr. S.S.P. Rao, Dy. A.M.A., Bhop
show all

Marketed Surplus and Post-harvest Losses of Jowar - Agmarknet

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?