29.03.2013 Views

Marketed Surplus and Post-harvest Losses of Jowar - Agmarknet

Marketed Surplus and Post-harvest Losses of Jowar - Agmarknet

Marketed Surplus and Post-harvest Losses of Jowar - Agmarknet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

S<br />

.<br />

N<br />

o<br />

.<br />

1<br />

.<br />

2<br />

.<br />

3<br />

.<br />

4<br />

.<br />

5<br />

.<br />

TABLE NO. 2<br />

MARKETABLE SURPLUS RATIOS OF SELECTED CEREALS<br />

Commodity Marketable<br />

surplus ratio<br />

(Percentage)<br />

Year <strong>of</strong><br />

reference<br />

Paddy 1 8.87 1972-73 1979<br />

Wheat 2 65.10 1973-74 1986<br />

<strong>Jowar</strong> 3 33.14 1974-75 1984<br />

Bajra 4 36.31 1974-75 1985<br />

Maize 5 30.86 1974-75 1987<br />

Year <strong>of</strong><br />

publication <strong>of</strong><br />

report<br />

2.3 This apart, micro studies are being undertaken in the Agricultural Universities <strong>and</strong> Research<br />

Institutes. Some <strong>of</strong> these findings with regard to marketable surplus & post <strong>harvest</strong> losses are<br />

furnished below :<br />

• The World Bank Operations Evaluation Study <strong>of</strong> (1974-85) 7 reported the storage losses <strong>of</strong><br />

Sorghum <strong>and</strong> Millet as 4% in Nigeria <strong>and</strong> 1.7% in Malavi.<br />

• Khadse, et al. 8 studied the marketable surplus <strong>of</strong> kharif jowar in Vidarbha Region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra<br />

<strong>and</strong> reported the marketable surplus <strong>of</strong> 7.22% in small category, 22.79% in medium category,<br />

42.66% in large category <strong>and</strong> 29.77% as overall average. The study further concluded that the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> jowar, marketable surplus <strong>and</strong> marketed surplus were having positive relationship<br />

with the size <strong>of</strong> holdings. Whereas the retentions for kind payment <strong>and</strong> home consumption were<br />

having negative relationship with the size <strong>of</strong> holding. In small <strong>and</strong> medium size holdings, the<br />

distress sale was found. They further concluded, “the major factor governing marketable surplus<br />

was being production <strong>and</strong> that home consumption <strong>and</strong> kind payment were responsible to reduce<br />

the marketable surplus <strong>of</strong> jowar in the area studied”. It may be mentioned here that jowar is a<br />

major staple food in the area <strong>of</strong> study conducted by the researchers.<br />

• Pawar P.P. et al. (1990) 9 reported that the marketable surplus <strong>of</strong> jowar was positively related to<br />

size <strong>of</strong> holdings in Marathwada region <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra. The study concludes that the distress sale<br />

<strong>of</strong> both rabi <strong>and</strong> kharif crop was found in case <strong>of</strong> small cultivators due to their urgent needs <strong>of</strong><br />

cash requirements. This is in conformity with the conclusions <strong>of</strong> the Khadse et.al. as indicated<br />

above.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!