Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X
Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X
Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2 I S F EENEYISM C ATHOLIC?<br />
nor on the right. The teaching Church must “religiously guard<br />
and faithfully explain the deposit <strong>of</strong> Faith that was handed down<br />
through the Apostles,…this apostolic doctrine that all the Fathers<br />
held, and the holy orthodox Doctors reverenced and followed”<br />
(Vatican I, Dz. 1836); all members <strong>of</strong> the Church must receive<br />
that same doctrine, without picking and choosing what they will<br />
believe. We may not deny a point <strong>of</strong> doctrine that belongs to the<br />
deposit <strong>of</strong> Faith–though not yet defined–under the pretext that it<br />
has been distorted by the Liberals.<br />
Moreover, there is at stake a whole attitude <strong>of</strong> mind in front<br />
<strong>of</strong> the truth <strong>of</strong> Faith. The <strong>Catholic</strong> Church teaches that Faith is<br />
the adhesion <strong>of</strong> the intelligence to the truth revealed by God,<br />
Who can neither deceive nor be deceived, which truth is faithfully<br />
taught by the <strong>Catholic</strong> Church. Faith therefore is a humble reception<br />
<strong>of</strong> Truth, a submission <strong>of</strong> the intelligence. This <strong>Catholic</strong> attitude<br />
<strong>of</strong> the faithful is called by <strong>St</strong>. Paul “the obedience <strong>of</strong> Faith”<br />
(Rom. 1:5, 16:26, Acts 6:7). Hence, when one sees so many holy<br />
Fathers, holy doctors, popes, saints and approved theologians<br />
teach as unanimously a doctrine as this one, the proper <strong>Catholic</strong><br />
attitude is to receive it with docility, striving to understand it “in<br />
the same sense and in the same words.” 4 It is not a <strong>Catholic</strong> attitude<br />
to reject one point <strong>of</strong> Faith, under the pretext <strong>of</strong> holding fast<br />
to another point <strong>of</strong> Faith, pretending that they are incompatible.<br />
The compatibility between both has been taught from the beginning,<br />
and wonderfully explained by the Doctors; it is not <strong>Catholic</strong><br />
to reject the Doctors’ doctrine, claiming to “improve upon the<br />
teaching <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the Doctors.” 5<br />
This book was first printed by Angelus Press with the title:<br />
Baptism <strong>of</strong> Desire. This second edition has been so deeply reworked<br />
that it could be fairly called a new book(!), though the<br />
whole material <strong>of</strong> the first edition is still found here. More research<br />
has been done for it, more Doctors and theologians have<br />
been consulted, all <strong>of</strong> them being found in perfect agreement<br />
with the traditional doctrine. I want to thank especially Fr. Joseph<br />
Pfeiffer and Mrs. Mary Buckalew for their research on this matter,<br />
which proved invaluable.<br />
4 Eodem sensu eademque sententia, I Cor. 1:10, quoted by Vatican I, Dz. 1800.<br />
5 Brother Michael, letter <strong>of</strong> March 3, 1986.