02.04.2013 Views

Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X

Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X

Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

S OME L IBERAL E RRORS 15<br />

SOME LIBERAL ERRORS<br />

Fr. Leonard Feeney reacted against the Liberals.<br />

The insidious heresy that there may be salvation outside the<br />

<strong>Catholic</strong> Church and that submission to the Supreme Pontiff is<br />

not necessary for salvation has been taught by implication in<br />

many ways but is now getting to be more and more <strong>of</strong> an explicit<br />

teaching.<br />

In more than one way people are made to believe that a man<br />

may be saved in any religion provided he is sincere, that a man<br />

may have baptism <strong>of</strong> desire even while explicitly refusing baptism<br />

<strong>of</strong> water, that a man may belong to the soul <strong>of</strong> the Church<br />

while persisting in his enmity to the Holy <strong>Catholic</strong> Church, indeed<br />

even while actively persecuting the Church. 17<br />

There was certainly need <strong>of</strong> correcting these liberal errors.<br />

Needless to say, these errors have spread everywhere with the ecumenism<br />

<strong>of</strong> Vatican II.<br />

DOES SINCERITY WITH IGNORANCE SAVE?<br />

The constant teaching <strong>of</strong> the Church is that sincerity with<br />

ignorance does not save. It is “faith working through charity” that<br />

counts (Gal. 5:6). Invincible ignorance <strong>of</strong> the truth <strong>of</strong> Faith excuses<br />

from a sin against faith, but it does not forgive the other<br />

sins. The principles <strong>of</strong> natural law are written in the hearts <strong>of</strong> all<br />

men (who have the use <strong>of</strong> their reason), especially: “Don’t do to<br />

others what you do not want them to do to you.”<br />

For example, a native in New Caledonia two hundred years<br />

ago who never heard <strong>of</strong> Christ was not guilty <strong>of</strong> a sin against faith,<br />

but that did not excuse him from cannibalism. At the Last Judgment,<br />

he will not be able to say: “I had no chance, I never had a<br />

missionary.” There is no need <strong>of</strong> a missionary to know, “Thou<br />

shalt not eat thy neighbor!”<br />

17 Catherine Goddard Clarke, The Loyolas and the Cabots, pp.159,160.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!