Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X
Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X
Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
S OME L IBERAL E RRORS 15<br />
SOME LIBERAL ERRORS<br />
Fr. Leonard Feeney reacted against the Liberals.<br />
The insidious heresy that there may be salvation outside the<br />
<strong>Catholic</strong> Church and that submission to the Supreme Pontiff is<br />
not necessary for salvation has been taught by implication in<br />
many ways but is now getting to be more and more <strong>of</strong> an explicit<br />
teaching.<br />
In more than one way people are made to believe that a man<br />
may be saved in any religion provided he is sincere, that a man<br />
may have baptism <strong>of</strong> desire even while explicitly refusing baptism<br />
<strong>of</strong> water, that a man may belong to the soul <strong>of</strong> the Church<br />
while persisting in his enmity to the Holy <strong>Catholic</strong> Church, indeed<br />
even while actively persecuting the Church. 17<br />
There was certainly need <strong>of</strong> correcting these liberal errors.<br />
Needless to say, these errors have spread everywhere with the ecumenism<br />
<strong>of</strong> Vatican II.<br />
DOES SINCERITY WITH IGNORANCE SAVE?<br />
The constant teaching <strong>of</strong> the Church is that sincerity with<br />
ignorance does not save. It is “faith working through charity” that<br />
counts (Gal. 5:6). Invincible ignorance <strong>of</strong> the truth <strong>of</strong> Faith excuses<br />
from a sin against faith, but it does not forgive the other<br />
sins. The principles <strong>of</strong> natural law are written in the hearts <strong>of</strong> all<br />
men (who have the use <strong>of</strong> their reason), especially: “Don’t do to<br />
others what you do not want them to do to you.”<br />
For example, a native in New Caledonia two hundred years<br />
ago who never heard <strong>of</strong> Christ was not guilty <strong>of</strong> a sin against faith,<br />
but that did not excuse him from cannibalism. At the Last Judgment,<br />
he will not be able to say: “I had no chance, I never had a<br />
missionary.” There is no need <strong>of</strong> a missionary to know, “Thou<br />
shalt not eat thy neighbor!”<br />
17 Catherine Goddard Clarke, The Loyolas and the Cabots, pp.159,160.