Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X
Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X
Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
60 IS F EENEYISM C ATHOLIC?<br />
<strong>of</strong> blood is <strong>of</strong> no avail to salvation; therefore there is no true martyrdom<br />
outside the Church, as <strong>St</strong>. Fulgentius, quoted by the<br />
Council <strong>of</strong> Florence, said. Now since such baptism <strong>of</strong> blood for<br />
Christ has more power unto sanctification than baptism <strong>of</strong> water,<br />
and yet outside the Church it cannot save, it follows that baptism<br />
<strong>of</strong> water outside the Church cannot save. Who does not see that<br />
this earliest testimony in favor <strong>of</strong> the dogma Outside the Church<br />
there is no salvation is completely distorted from its meaning if one<br />
denies baptism <strong>of</strong> blood?<br />
In §22 <strong>St</strong>. Cyprian was most explicit about baptism <strong>of</strong> blood,<br />
and founded his doctrine on several passages <strong>of</strong> the Gospel.<br />
In §23 we find a typical case <strong>of</strong> baptism <strong>of</strong> desire; this is the<br />
oldest testimony on this topic. <strong>St</strong>. Cyprian considered what to<br />
think <strong>of</strong> those converts baptized outside the Church and received<br />
in the Church only with the sacrament <strong>of</strong> penance without rebaptism.<br />
According to his opinion, they had an invalid baptism.<br />
Though this was not the case in the early Church when even the<br />
heretics were baptizing properly, it can happen today; indeed in<br />
former days the Church considered that, for the certitude <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sacrament, given the fact that some Protestant sects were not baptizing<br />
properly, we ought to rebaptize conditionally except if the<br />
pro<strong>of</strong> was made <strong>of</strong> the validity <strong>of</strong> the first baptism. But, out <strong>of</strong><br />
ecumenism, the presumption has now been turned around (not<br />
to rebaptize unless one has the pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> invalidity); hence the door<br />
is opened to cases where converts from Protestantism who really<br />
had an invalid baptism are received without being baptized. So<br />
what happens to them? They have the <strong>Catholic</strong> faith, live “with<br />
simplicity” and “have fallen asleep in the Church,” yet without a<br />
valid baptism! <strong>St</strong>. Cyprian gave then the very same answer which<br />
will be always given by the Fathers and Doctors after him: “Potens<br />
est Deus misericordia sua–God is powerful in His Mercy” to save<br />
them! This passage is quoted by <strong>St</strong>. Robert Bellarmine: thus far<br />
from being disapproved by the Church, the Fathers on this point<br />
<strong>of</strong> doctrine have been constantly approved by her.<br />
Note that <strong>St</strong>. Cyprian considered both to be in the Church:<br />
the <strong>Catholic</strong> catechumen martyrs “advance from the divine<br />
camp,” i.e., they go to the battle against the persecutor as belonging<br />
to the Army <strong>of</strong> Christ, the Church! And the men with baptism<br />
<strong>of</strong> desire “fall asleep in the Church.”