Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X
Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X
Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
110 IS F EENEYISM C ATHOLIC?<br />
At the root <strong>of</strong> this fear <strong>of</strong> a loophole, there is an inability to<br />
grasp the distinctions taught by the Church. The Doctors explained<br />
that there are several kinds <strong>of</strong> necessity: 1) Metaphysical<br />
necessity, i.e., necessity <strong>of</strong> nature, which God Himself cannot bypass,<br />
since it would imply contradiction. For instance, Christ cannot<br />
have a human nature without a human will. That is not a<br />
limitation on God, on the contrary, God is too intelligent to contradict<br />
Himself. 2) Necessity <strong>of</strong> means: thus we have no other<br />
means to get sanctifying grace than baptism <strong>of</strong> water; yet God is<br />
not limited by the means He has established, and He can pour<br />
His grace without the water. Such bypassing <strong>of</strong> the laws He has<br />
established in the natural order is a miracle in nature; similarly<br />
baptism <strong>of</strong> desire is like a miracle in the supernatural order, possible<br />
but not common. 3) Necessity <strong>of</strong> precept, which always requires<br />
the interior submission <strong>of</strong> the will, and the exterior fulfillment<br />
as much as one can. Not receiving with humble submission<br />
<strong>of</strong> the intellect these distinctions taught by the Church, they<br />
think that if one admits one exception to the baptism <strong>of</strong> water,<br />
then one makes it optional. For them either baptism <strong>of</strong> water is<br />
absolutely necessary or not necessary; if they hear <strong>of</strong> any exception,<br />
they feel the necessity <strong>of</strong> baptism is completely ruined and<br />
the dogma that outside the Church there is no salvation is ruined<br />
also. This is simply not true.<br />
THE FUNDAMENTAL ERROR OF FR. FEENEY<br />
We can see here that the fundamental error <strong>of</strong> Fr. Feeney is to<br />
follow his own interpretation <strong>of</strong> the dogma, and to re-interpret<br />
the Scriptures and the documents <strong>of</strong> the popes according to his<br />
own views. In one word, it is to put his views before the Church’s<br />
teaching.<br />
As fully documented in the section on the teaching <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Church, and as explained above, the proper understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />
dogma <strong>of</strong> the Church Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus is that, in order<br />
to go to heaven, one must be united with the Roman <strong>Catholic</strong><br />
Church re aut voto: the interior bond with the Church, which<br />
consists in sanctifying grace with <strong>Catholic</strong> faith, hope and charity,<br />
is absolutely necessary; the exterior bond with the Church, which<br />
consists in the pr<strong>of</strong>ession <strong>of</strong> the Faith, the communion <strong>of</strong> worship<br />
and first <strong>of</strong> all the reception <strong>of</strong> the sacrament <strong>of</strong> baptism, and the