02.04.2013 Views

Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X

Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X

Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

36 IS F EENEYISM C ATHOLIC?<br />

Lord mentioning the water as the obligatory means (necessary “re<br />

aut voto–in fact or in desire”) to obtain that spiritual rebirth. Contrary<br />

to what the followers <strong>of</strong> Fr. Feeney pretend, the emphasis <strong>of</strong><br />

this whole passage is not on water, but on rebirth. By holding<br />

with the Church that the rebirth is what is absolutely necessary,<br />

and that water is necessary “re aut voto,” one respects the truth <strong>of</strong><br />

the words <strong>of</strong> Our Lord and the truth <strong>of</strong> the interpretation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Church. By pretending that water itself is absolutely necessary<br />

without any exception whatsoever, one departs from the interpretation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Church, thereby being unfaithful to Our Lord Himself.<br />

IS JOHN 3:5 A LAW?<br />

Bro. Robert Mary objects thus: “It is not totally correct to say<br />

that the above quote from Our Lord is a law. A law, strictly speaking,<br />

is a command or a prohibition. The words <strong>of</strong> Our Lord [...]<br />

are given by <strong>St</strong>. John in the form <strong>of</strong> a proposition, a statement <strong>of</strong><br />

fact. It is either true or it is false. [...] God is not bound by the laws<br />

He has set. However, God is bound by the propositions He has<br />

made. [...] If God is not bound by water in terms <strong>of</strong> salvation,<br />

then we may ask, why bind Him to His word in any <strong>of</strong> His teachings?”<br />

(op. cit., p.99).<br />

His reasoning falsely presupposes that baptism <strong>of</strong> blood and<br />

baptism <strong>of</strong> desire would make Our Lord’s proposition false. This<br />

objection had been answered many times by the best theologians<br />

(e.g., <strong>St</strong>. Thomas quoted above) unanimously. For instance Billuart<br />

44 : “He who said generally, unless one is reborn, etc., has said<br />

with no less generality: everyone who believes in him shall not be<br />

confounded, 45 whosoever shall invoke the name <strong>of</strong> the Lord shall<br />

be saved, 46 he who loves Me shall be loved by My Father, 47 and<br />

other similar statements. Hence the Church rightly understands<br />

this general sentence <strong>of</strong> Christ unless one is reborn <strong>of</strong> baptism <strong>of</strong><br />

water in re vel in voto–in fact or in desire.” Thus the proposition <strong>of</strong><br />

44 Summa Sancti Thomae, III, p.233 (Part VI, Ch.1, A.6; he has 12 pages on<br />

baptism <strong>of</strong> desire).<br />

45 Rom. 9:33, 10:11, quoting <strong>Is</strong>. 28:16.<br />

46 <strong>St</strong>. Peter in Acts 2:21, <strong>St</strong>. Paul Rom. 10:13, both quoting Joel 2:32.<br />

47 Jn. 14:21; for other texts, see for instance Jn. 11:26.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!