02.04.2013 Views

Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X

Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X

Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A NSWER TO OBJECTIONS 111<br />

hierarchical communion, is necessary re aut voto. As we have seen,<br />

the Fathers and Doctors never considered those baptized with<br />

their blood as being simply outside the Church, nor those “fervent<br />

catechumens” who were prevented by death: they belong to<br />

the Church, though their exterior bond is still incomplete.<br />

Hence, the doctrine <strong>of</strong> baptism <strong>of</strong> blood and baptism <strong>of</strong> desire belongs<br />

to the proper understanding <strong>of</strong> the dogma. To reject it is to<br />

reject the proper understanding <strong>of</strong> the dogma. It goes against Vatican<br />

I, which orders us: “Of the sacred dogmas, that sense must be<br />

faithfully upheld, which holy Mother Church has once declared;<br />

and one may never depart from this sense on the specious ground<br />

<strong>of</strong> a more pr<strong>of</strong>ound understanding” (Dz. 1800). <strong>Is</strong>n’t it precisely<br />

what Fr. Feeney did, pretending “to improve upon the Fathers”?<br />

This attachment to one’s own interpretation can lead some<br />

followers <strong>of</strong> Fr. Feeney to so stress the exterior belonging to the<br />

Church that they lose from sight the primacy <strong>of</strong> the interior<br />

union with Christ, attributing to the exterior sacrament what the<br />

Church says <strong>of</strong> the interior grace <strong>of</strong> the sacrament which, in exceptional<br />

cases, can be had without the exterior sacrament,<br />

though not without the desire <strong>of</strong> this external sacrament. As a<br />

consequence, they arrive at positions contradictory to the very<br />

definitions which they pretend to defend. An example: Fr. Wathen,<br />

after having given the passage <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> Trent on<br />

justification (which, as the Council says, can be had by baptism <strong>of</strong><br />

desire), concludes:<br />

This disposition <strong>of</strong> soul and others equivalent to it...do bring<br />

justification. But, since such an act and disposition do not make<br />

one a member <strong>of</strong> the Church, they do not suffice for the reward<br />

<strong>of</strong> Heaven. 163<br />

Now, to pretend that one can be justified without being a<br />

member <strong>of</strong> the Church goes against Boniface VIII, who said that<br />

outside the Church there is no remission <strong>of</strong> sins! The truth is that we<br />

ought to consider that baptism <strong>of</strong> desire builds a first bond with<br />

Christ and His Church, an interior but real bond, which still<br />

must be completed by the exterior reception <strong>of</strong> the sacrament.<br />

However, thanks to that first bond with the Church, were such a<br />

163 Who Shall Ascend, p.109.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!