02.04.2013 Views

Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X

Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X

Is Feeneyism Catholic? - Society of St. Pius X

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

T HE TEACHING OF THE CHURCH 51<br />

[Session 7] “Can. 5. If anyone says that baptism is optional,<br />

that is, not necessary for salvation, let him be anathema. Can. 2:<br />

If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for<br />

baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words <strong>of</strong> our<br />

Lord Jesus Christ: ‘unless a man be born again <strong>of</strong> water and the<br />

Holy Ghost’, let him be anathema.” In terms <strong>of</strong> a syllogism we<br />

have the infallible major premise: “Baptism is necessary for salvation,”<br />

the infallible minor premise: “True and natural water is<br />

necessary for Baptism,” and the infallible conclusion: “True and<br />

natural water is necessary for salvation!”<br />

The answer is simple: <strong>of</strong> what kind <strong>of</strong> necessity does the<br />

Council speak in Canon 5? Of the same <strong>of</strong> which the Council <strong>of</strong><br />

Trent itself has spoken in Session 6, Chapter 4, and again in Session<br />

7, Canon 4, i.e., a necessity re aut voto––in deed or in desire.<br />

Their syllogism hence become: baptism is necessary re aut voto for<br />

salvation; now true and natural water is necessary for baptism (it<br />

belongs to its essence); hence true and natural water is necessary re<br />

aut voto for salvation! To say that baptism <strong>of</strong> water is necessary in<br />

fact or in desire is clearly not to say that it is superfluous, nor unnecessary<br />

for salvation!<br />

See later p.98 for a discussion <strong>of</strong> justification versus salvation.<br />

PIUS IX<br />

<strong>Pius</strong> IX is the Pope <strong>of</strong> the Syllabus and <strong>of</strong> the definition <strong>of</strong><br />

papal infallibility. In one <strong>of</strong> his encyclicals from which propositions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Syllabus were drawn, on August 10, 1863, he wrote:<br />

And here, Beloved Sons and Venerable Brethren, it is necessary<br />

once more to mention and censure the serious error into<br />

which some <strong>Catholic</strong>s have unfortunately fallen. For they are <strong>of</strong><br />

the opinion that men who live in errors, estranged from the true<br />

faith and from <strong>Catholic</strong> unity, can attain eternal life. That is in<br />

direct opposition to <strong>Catholic</strong> teaching. We all know that those<br />

who are afflicted with invincible ignorance with regard to our<br />

holy religion, if they carefully keep the precepts <strong>of</strong> the natural<br />

law that have been written by God in the hearts <strong>of</strong> all men, if<br />

they are prepared to obey God, and if they lead a virtuous and<br />

dutiful life, can attain eternal life by the power <strong>of</strong> divine light<br />

and grace. For God, who reads comprehensively in every detail<br />

the minds and souls, the thoughts and habits <strong>of</strong> all men, will not<br />

permit, in accordance with his infinite goodness and mercy, anyone<br />

who is not guilty <strong>of</strong> a voluntary fault to suffer eternal pun-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!