Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Abbrins v. State, 882 S.W,2d 914 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1994, no pet.) . . 128 Abemathv v. State, 963 S.W.2d 822 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1998, pet. refd) . . . 53 : Adams v. State, 67 S.W.3d 450 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2002, pet. refd.) . . 114 Adams v. State, 808 S.W. 2d 250, (Tex.App.-Houston ['t$ Dist.] 1991, no pet.) . . . . . 98, 108 Adamsv. State,969S.W.2d 106(Tex.App.-Dallas 1998, nopet.) . ...... 45 Addinston v. State,730 S.W.2d 788,789-90 (Tex.App.-Texarkana, pet. refd) . . . 130 Aquirre v. State, 928 S.W.2d 759 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, no pet.) . ......... 2 Aquirre v. State, 948 S.W.2d 377 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, pet. ref'd] . ... 45,67 Akinsv.State,2007WL 1847378 (Tex.App.-Houston[14thDist]2007,no pet.) .. ....... 41 Alami v. State, 333 S.W.3d 881 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2011, reh. ovenuled) . . . . '141 Albertv.State,659S.W.2d41 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist] 1983, pet. refd) . ........ 11 Alexanderv. State,949S.W.2d 772(Tex.App.-Dallas 1997, pet. refd) . ........ 49 Alford v. State, 22 S.W.3d 669 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2000, pet. refd) 54, 56 Aliff v. State,627s.W.2d 166(Tex.Crim.App.1982) ....... 92 dlfJ,SEtg, 955 S.W.2d 891 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1997, no pet.) . . . . 112,113 Aflen v. State, 849 S.W.2d 838 (Tex.App.-Houston [1"tDist] 1993, pet. refd) . . . . . 46 Anderson v. State, 1 10 S.W.3d 98 (Tex.App,-Dallas 2003, reh. ovenuled) . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 P:**lii::?i?:::i::i:1:lilllll:f::l:T:-'"')J):l:::::ii'::'::y:':11"1) * Anderson v. State, 2010 WL 3370054 (Tex.App.-Austin 2010) . . . . 33 Anderson v. State, 341 S.W.3d 585 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2011, pet. filed) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Anderson v. State, 866 S.W.2d 685 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, pet. refd) . . . . . . 57 Andrewsv.State, 79S.W.3d649(Tex.App.-Waco2002, pdrrefd) .... 18 Annis v. State, 578 S.W.2d 406 (Tex.Crim.App. 1979) . . . . . 78 Armendarizv. State,123S.W.3d401 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) ....... 20 Arnold v. State,971 S.W.2d 588 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1998, no pet.) .. ........ 38 Article 14.03 (qX1) Atkinsv. State,990 S.W.2d 763 (Tex.App.-Austin 1999, pet. ref'd) . ...... 116 Atkinson v. State, 871 S.W.2d 252 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1 994, rev'd, 923 S.W.2d 21 (Tex.Crim.App. 1 996) . . . 1 15, 117 L64
Avfor v. State, 2011 WL 1659887 (Tex.App.- Tyler 2011, pet. refd) (Not designated for publication) . . . . 104 Bachickv. State,30 S.W.3d 549(Tex.App.-FortWorth 2000, pet. refd) ........ 20 Badqett v. State, 42 S.W.3d 136 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001). . . . . 90 Baqbv v. State, 2007 WL 704931 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2007, no pet.) (not designated for publication) . . . . . . . 146 Baqheri v. State, 119 S.W.3d 755 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) . . . . . . . . . 87 Bakerv. State, 177 S.W.3d 113 (Tex.App.-Houston [1"tDist.] 2005, no pet.) . . . . . 48 Bakerv. State,519 S.W.2d 437 (Tex.Crim.App. 1975) Bakerv. State,879S.W.2d218(Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist] 1994, pet. refd) . ....... 47 Barfield v. State, 63 S.W.3d 446 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001) . . . . 130 Banaza v. State. 733 S.W. 2d 379 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi, 1987, pet. granted) aff'd 790 S.W. 2d 654 (Tex.Crim.App.June20, 1990) ...41,62 Banonv. State,2011WL5375115(Tex.Crim.App.2011) ...... .. 116 Bartleft v. State, 270 S.W.3d 147 (Tex.Crim.App. 2008) . . . 122 Barton v. State, 948 S.W.2d 364 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1997, no pet.) 65, 155 Bass v. State, 64 S.W.3d 646 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2001, pet. refd) . . . . . 24 Bassv.State,7239.W.2d687(Tex.Crim.App.1986) ;..... ...... 77 Battle v. State, 989 S.W.2d 840 {Tex.App. -Texarkana 1 999, no pet.} . . . . . . 139 Beard v. State, 5 S.W.3d 883 (Tex.App.-Eastland 1999), permanently abated in 108 S.W.3 304 (TCA-2003), opinion withdrawn in 2003 WL 21398347 (TA-Eastland, June 18, 2003) (unpublished). /<strong>Case</strong> was permanently abated due to death. The body of opinion can be found at httpt/www.cca.courts.state.tx.udopinion{028200.htm1 . . 82,84 Bearden v. State, 2000 WL 19638 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, pet. refd) . . . . . . 111 Beasfevv.State,S'10S.W.2d838(Tex.App.-FortWorth1991,pet.refd) ..112,123 Beck v. State, 651 S.W.2d 827 (Tex.App.-Houston [1't Dist.] 1983, no pet.) . . . . . . 97 Beeman v. State, 86 S.W.3d 613, (Tex.Crim.App. 2002) . . . 100 Bell v. State, 2005 WL 503647 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2005, pet. refd)(mem. op., not designated for publication) 123 &![Statg,201 S.W.3d708(Tex.Crim.App.,2006) ..... 133 &![tSE!9,881S.W.2d794(Tex.App._Houston[14thDist.]1994,pet'refd)' Benedict v. State, 2004 WL 2108837, (Tex.App.-Fort Worth, 2004, pet. refd) . . , '152 Bennett v. State, 723 S.W.2d 359 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1987, no pet.) . . . 91 Bersnerv. State,2008W14779592 (Tex.App.-FortWorth 2008, no pet.) . . ..... 76 Bhakta v. State, 124 S.W.3d 738 (Tex.App.-Houston [1 Dist.], 2003, pdr refd) . . . . . . . . . 88 Bicev. State, 17S.W.3d354(Tex.App.-Houston [1"tDist.]2000, rehovenuled) ........ 22 1_65
Page 1 and 2:
Driving While Intoxicated Case Law
Page 3 and 4:
2. DOESN'T APPLY 18 F. OFFICER'S AR
Page 5 and 6:
K, L. M. N. o. P. o. R. NOSOUND=NOP
Page 7 and 8:
F. G. H, L J. K. L. 3. NO RIGHT TO
Page 9 and 10:
C. D. STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR DR
Page 11 and 12:
E, F. G. H. t. J. K. L. M. N. o. P.
Page 13 and 14:
O. IF YOU ALLEGE MORE PRIOR DWI'S T
Page 15 and 16:
I. INFORMATION/CHARGING INSTRUMENT
Page 17 and 18:
B. IMPROPER QUESTION/STATEMENT Hark
Page 19 and 20:
DWI ROADBLOCKS A. ARE ILLEGAL Holt
Page 21 and 22:
V. OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE CHART The f
Page 23 and 24:
Elisibilitv for Occupational Driver
Page 25 and 26:
Villarealv. State, 2008 WL 4367616
Page 27 and 28:
out that hearsay is generally admis
Page 29 and 30:
Foster v. State, 326 S.W.3d 609 (Te
Page 31 and 32:
anyone other than officer to help h
Page 33 and 34:
F. OFFICER'S ARREST AUTHORITY WHEN
Page 35 and 36:
occur) who observed the traffic off
Page 37 and 38:
a mile in the early morning hours.
Page 39 and 40:
State v. Arriaqa, 5 S.W.3d 804 (Tex
Page 41 and 42:
explain the margin of error or the
Page 43 and 44:
P. "FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY''- SUFFIC
Page 45 and 46:
defendant from leaving. Officer sai
Page 47 and 48:
2. REASONABLE Bohren v. State,2011W
Page 49 and 50:
Sinqleton v. State. 91 S.W.3d 342 (
Page 51 and 52:
B. BASED ON'BREACH OF PEACE'THEORY
Page 53 and 54:
IX. VIDEO A. PARTS OF PREDICATE CAN
Page 55 and 56:
Mathieu v. State, 992 S.W.2d725 (Te
Page 57 and 58:
F. ABSENCE OF VIDEOTAPE 1. NOT GROU
Page 59 and 60:
K. NO SOUND = NO PROBLEM Aouirre v.
Page 61 and 62:
R. OFFICER'S NARRATIVE ON PERFORMAN
Page 63 and 64:
was effor, albeit harmless, to allo
Page 65 and 66:
forfeited in the guilt-innocence ph
Page 67 and 68:
ecoming the focus of a DWI investig
Page 69 and 70:
Rasan v. State,642S.W.2d 489 (Tex.C
Page 71 and 72:
2. OFFICER DOES NOT HAVE TO BE AN O
Page 73 and 74:
the reliability of VGN before it is
Page 75 and 76:
C. WALK AND TURN = LAY WITNESS TEST
Page 77 and 78:
G. FAILURE TO EXPLAIN FST'S IN DEFE
Page 79 and 80:
B. PROOF OF "STATE'' Barton v. Stat
Page 81 and 82:
C. INSTRUMENT CERTIFICATION 1, NEW
Page 83 and 84:
G. DIC.23 & DIC.24 WARNINGS 1. REQU
Page 85 and 86:
warning on refusing alcoholfesfs, b
Page 87 and 88:
efusing or of giving a sample for s
Page 89 and 90:
2. NO EVIDENCE THAT ADDITIONAL WARN
Page 91 and 92:
Hall v. State, 649 S.W.2d 627 (Tex.
Page 93 and 94:
3. AFTER 2 HOURS Holloway v. State,
Page 95 and 96:
P. BREATH TEST ADMISSIBLE AS PROOF
Page 97 and 98:
T. LOSS OF NORMAL & PER SE LAW EVID
Page 99 and 100:
fesf resu/fs were not inflammatory
Page 101 and 102:
6. IMPROPER ADMISSION OF EXTRAPOLAT
Page 103 and 104:
esu/fs. As long as fhe operator kno
Page 105 and 106:
suggesf that he was physically or m
Page 107 and 108:
D. PROCEDURE FOR TAKING BLOOD SAMPL
Page 109 and 110:
Thurman v. State, 861 S.W.2d 96 (Te
Page 111 and 112:
4. NOT NECESSARY TO SHOW WHO DREW T
Page 113 and 114:
Biqon v. State, 252 S.W.3d 360 (Tex
Page 115 and 116:
offense of DWI," the Court finds th
Page 117 and 118:
8. SEARCH WARRANT AFFIDAVIT CONTAIN
Page 119 and 120:
(b) FArAL Farhart v. State, 337 S.W
Page 121 and 122:
consenfs, 724.012 does not apply. H
Page 123 and 124:
in the Sfafe's case-in-chief, the S
Page 125 and 126:
was not the result of an involuntar
Page 127 and 128: trance-like high. The Court affirme
Page 129 and 130: C. CHARGE ON WORKING CONDITION OF I
Page 131 and 132: intoxication sefs forfh alternative
Page 133 and 134: of Appeals had misconstrued the act
Page 135 and 136: the impairment element of the Sfafe
Page 137 and 138: Sledqe v. State ,1994 WL 247961 (Te
Page 139 and 140: V. WHEN CHARGE SPECIFICALLY USES SU
Page 141 and 142: Tennerv v. State, 680 S.W.2d 629 (T
Page 143 and 144: E. ENHANCEMENT OF FELONY DWI WITH N
Page 145 and 146: Also, if stipulated that there are
Page 147 and 148: of the priors. He then complained o
Page 149 and 150: K. PROPER TO ALLEGE DATE PROBATION
Page 151 and 152: o. IF YOU ALLEGE MORE PRIOR DWI'S T
Page 153 and 154: a violation of the ex posf facto la
Page 155 and 156: W. EXPUNCTION WILL NOT ALWAYS RENDE
Page 157 and 158: intoxicated (DWI) from a C/ass B mi
Page 159 and 160: Holmberq v. State, 931 S.W.2d 3(Tex
Page 161 and 162: G. NO CONFLICT BETWEEN N'DUI'' AND
Page 163 and 164: equipment was obserued in the vehic
Page 165 and 166: unning, radio playing loudly, and d
Page 167 and 168: wheels was consr.stent with the whe
Page 169 and 170: Wriqht v. State, 932 S.W.2d 572 (Te
Page 171 and 172: Bucek v. State ,724 S.W .2d 129 (Te
Page 173 and 174: concerning how recently the vehicle
Page 175 and 176: B. DENIAL OF PROBATION DUE TO LANGU
Page 177: alcohol by calling a sysfem adminis
Page 181 and 182: Carrasco v. State,712S.W.2d 120 (Te
Page 183 and 184: Drapkin v. State, 781 S.W.2d 710 (T
Page 185 and 186: Folev v. State, 327 S.W.3d 907 (Tex
Page 187 and 188: (Tex.Crim.App. 1988)..... .......42
Page 189 and 190: Human v. State, 749 S.W.2d 832 {Tex
Page 191 and 192: Lewisv.State,72S.W.3d704(Tex.App.-F
Page 193 and 194: Moncivais v. State, 2O02WL 1445200
Page 195 and 196: Poncev. State,828 S.W.2d 50 (Tex.Ap
Page 197 and 198: Schaum v. State, 833 S.W.2d 644 (Te
Page 199 and 200: State v. Gerstenkom, 239 S.W.3d 357
Page 201 and 202: Stone v. State, 685 S.W.2d 791 (Tex
Page 203 and 204: Vasquezv. State,2007WL 2417373 (Tex
show all

Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?