Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Kennedvv.State,264S.W.3d372(Tex.App.-Houston[1 Dist.],2008,reh.ovenuled,pet.refd.) ....... 87 Kennedv v. Texas Department of Public Safetv,2009 WL '1493802 (Tex.App.-Houston [1"t Dist.] 2009, no pet.) . . 78 Kennemur v. State, 280 S.W.3d 305 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2008,reh. overruled, pet. refd) . . . . . 79, 93 Kercho v. State, 948 S.W.2d 34 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, pet. refd) . . . . . 66, 82 Kerr v. State, 921 S.W.2d 498 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) . . 57, 154 Kenv. Texas Departmentof Public Safetv,973 S.W.2d 732 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1998, no pet.). . . . . . . 80 Kessfer v. State, 2010 WL 1137047 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2010, pet. ref d.) (Not designated for publication) . . . . 34 Kimballv. State,24S.W.3d555(Tex.App.-Waco2000, no pet.) . ....... 13 Kinq v. State ,732 S.W .2d 796 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1 987, pet. refd) . . . . . 1 Kirkham v. State,632 S.W.2d 682 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1982, no pet.) . . . . .. 2 Kirsch v. State, 276 S.W.3d 579 (Tex.App.-Houston [ 1't Dist.] 2008) affd 306 S.W.3d 738 (Tex.Crim.App. 2010) Kirsch v. State, 306 S.W.3d 738 (Tex.Crim.App. 2010) . . . . 123 Kfepperv. State,2009 WL 384299 (Tex.App.-FortWorth 2009, no pet.) . . .. ... . 33 Knappv. State,942 S.W.2d 176(Tex.App.-Beaumont 1997, pet. refd). ........ 94 Knislev v. State, 81 S.W.3d 478 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2002, pel. refd.) . . . . . . 92 Koteras v. State, 2010 WL 1790803 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) 18 Kruqv. State,86 S.W.3d 764 (Tex.App.-ElPaso 2002,pet. refd.) . ...... 28 Kuciembav. State,310S.W.3d460(Tex.Crim.App.2010) ....... 160 Kunkel v. State, 46 S.W.3d 328 (Tex.App,-Houston [14th Dist.] March 8, 2001, pet.refd.) . . . . 28,37 Lacv v. State, 875 S.W.2d 3 (Tex.App.-Tyler 1994, no pet.) . . . . . 160 Lane v. State, 933 S.W.2d 504 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996) . . ' . . . 44 Lane v. State, 951 S.W.2d 242lTex.App.-Austin 1997, no pet.l . .... 69 Laroque v. State, 2010 WL 3303857 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2010, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) . . . . 121 Lavton v. State, 280 S.W.3d 285 (Tex.Crim.App. 2009, reh. denied) . . . . . . 56 kal-6!at9,782s.W.2d844(Tex.Crim.App.1989) ...... 44 Le0ourias v. State, 341 S.W.3d 483 (Tex.App.-Houston [14 Dist] 2011) . . . . . 10,37 Ledet v. State, 2009 WL 2050753 (Tex.App.-Houston [1$ Dist.] 2009, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) . 150 Leonard v. State, 923 S.W.2d 770 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) . . . . 3 Leos v. State, 883 S.W.2d 209 (Tex.Crim.App. 1994) . . . . . 39 Leverett v. State, 2007 WL 1054140 (Tex.App.-Dallas, 2007, no pet.) . . . . 59 L76 96
Lewisv.State,72S.W.3d704(Tex.App.-FortWorth2002,pet.refd) ..:... .... 52 Lewis v. State, 933 S.W.2d 172 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi1996, pet. refd) . . . . 47,50 Lewis v. State, 951 S.W.2d 235 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1997, no pet.) ........ 1 Liles v. State, 2009 WL 3152174 (Tex.App.-Houston [1s Dist.] 2009, no pet.) (Not designated for.publication) . . . 58 Loar v. State, 627 S.W.2d 399 (Tex.Crim.App. [panel op] 1981) . . . 53 Loqanv. State, 757S.W.2d 160(Tex.App.-SanAntonio 1988, no pet.).. ....... 43 Lomaxv.State,233S.W.3d302(Tex.Crim.App.2007), habeasreliefdenied,2008WL5085653(Tex.App.-Houston['l4s Dist.l2008,pet.refd) ......142 Lonq v. State, 649 S.W.2d 363 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1983, pet. refd) . . . 108 Lonsdalev.State.2OOOWL 2480342(Tex.App.-ElPaso,2006, pet. refd).. ..... 62 Lopez v. State, 805 S.W.2d 882 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1991, no pet.) . . . 128, 156 Lopezv.State,936S.W.2d332(Tex.App.-SanAntonio 1996, pet. refd) . ....... g7 Lorenzv. State,176 S.W.3d 492 (Tex.App.-Houston [1 Dist.] 2004,pdr refd). . ... 61 Lovv.State,982S.W.2d616(Tex.App.-Houston[1"tDist.]1998,nopet.) .. ..... 39 Luianv. State,331 S.W.3d768(Tex.Crim.App.2011) ... ........ 33 Lvnch v. State, 687 S.W.2d 76 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1985, pet. refd) . . . . . . 96 -*T*'llllY:ilTll:ii::-T:::i:tl:i?iliii?:i:i:::T:'11:1:11111:i Mahaffev v. State,2011WL72'1505 (Tex.App.-Tyler, March 2,2011, pet. granted) (Not designated for publication) 35 Mahaffevv.State,937S.W.2d51 (Tex.App.-Houston[1"tDisti,1996,nopet.).. ....... 136 Maibauerv. State,968 S.W.2d 502 (Tex.App.-Waco 1998, pet. refd) . . . . . 130, 133 Malkowskv v. Texas Department of Public Safetv, 53 S.W.3d 873 (Tex.App.-Houston [1$ Dist.] 2001, pet. denied) 78 Mann v. State, 13 S.W.3d 89 (Tex.App.-Austin 2000, Affirmed other grounds 58 S.W.3d 1 32 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001 ) Mann v. State, 525 S.W.2d 174 (Tex.Crim.App. 1975) . . . . . 14 Mann v. State, 58 S.W.3d 132 (Tex.Crim.App.2001) . . . . . . 118 Manninq v. State, 114 S.W.3d 922 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) . . . . 87 Manor v. State, 2006 WL 2692873 (Tex.App.-Eastland, 2006, no pet.) . . . . . . 43, 108 Mapesv.State, 187S.W.3d655(Tex.App.-Houston[14thDist.]2006,pet.refd) ..r.... ...... 140 Markey v. State, 996 S.W.2d 226 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, no pet.] .. ........ 48 Martinv.DepartmentofPublicSafetv,964S.W.2dTT2(fex.App.-Austin1998,nopet.) .. ...7'1,84 1-1 7
Page 1 and 2:
Driving While Intoxicated Case Law
Page 3 and 4:
2. DOESN'T APPLY 18 F. OFFICER'S AR
Page 5 and 6:
K, L. M. N. o. P. o. R. NOSOUND=NOP
Page 7 and 8:
F. G. H, L J. K. L. 3. NO RIGHT TO
Page 9 and 10:
C. D. STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR DR
Page 11 and 12:
E, F. G. H. t. J. K. L. M. N. o. P.
Page 13 and 14:
O. IF YOU ALLEGE MORE PRIOR DWI'S T
Page 15 and 16:
I. INFORMATION/CHARGING INSTRUMENT
Page 17 and 18:
B. IMPROPER QUESTION/STATEMENT Hark
Page 19 and 20:
DWI ROADBLOCKS A. ARE ILLEGAL Holt
Page 21 and 22:
V. OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE CHART The f
Page 23 and 24:
Elisibilitv for Occupational Driver
Page 25 and 26:
Villarealv. State, 2008 WL 4367616
Page 27 and 28:
out that hearsay is generally admis
Page 29 and 30:
Foster v. State, 326 S.W.3d 609 (Te
Page 31 and 32:
anyone other than officer to help h
Page 33 and 34:
F. OFFICER'S ARREST AUTHORITY WHEN
Page 35 and 36:
occur) who observed the traffic off
Page 37 and 38:
a mile in the early morning hours.
Page 39 and 40:
State v. Arriaqa, 5 S.W.3d 804 (Tex
Page 41 and 42:
explain the margin of error or the
Page 43 and 44:
P. "FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY''- SUFFIC
Page 45 and 46:
defendant from leaving. Officer sai
Page 47 and 48:
2. REASONABLE Bohren v. State,2011W
Page 49 and 50:
Sinqleton v. State. 91 S.W.3d 342 (
Page 51 and 52:
B. BASED ON'BREACH OF PEACE'THEORY
Page 53 and 54:
IX. VIDEO A. PARTS OF PREDICATE CAN
Page 55 and 56:
Mathieu v. State, 992 S.W.2d725 (Te
Page 57 and 58:
F. ABSENCE OF VIDEOTAPE 1. NOT GROU
Page 59 and 60:
K. NO SOUND = NO PROBLEM Aouirre v.
Page 61 and 62:
R. OFFICER'S NARRATIVE ON PERFORMAN
Page 63 and 64:
was effor, albeit harmless, to allo
Page 65 and 66:
forfeited in the guilt-innocence ph
Page 67 and 68:
ecoming the focus of a DWI investig
Page 69 and 70:
Rasan v. State,642S.W.2d 489 (Tex.C
Page 71 and 72:
2. OFFICER DOES NOT HAVE TO BE AN O
Page 73 and 74:
the reliability of VGN before it is
Page 75 and 76:
C. WALK AND TURN = LAY WITNESS TEST
Page 77 and 78:
G. FAILURE TO EXPLAIN FST'S IN DEFE
Page 79 and 80:
B. PROOF OF "STATE'' Barton v. Stat
Page 81 and 82:
C. INSTRUMENT CERTIFICATION 1, NEW
Page 83 and 84:
G. DIC.23 & DIC.24 WARNINGS 1. REQU
Page 85 and 86:
warning on refusing alcoholfesfs, b
Page 87 and 88:
efusing or of giving a sample for s
Page 89 and 90:
2. NO EVIDENCE THAT ADDITIONAL WARN
Page 91 and 92:
Hall v. State, 649 S.W.2d 627 (Tex.
Page 93 and 94:
3. AFTER 2 HOURS Holloway v. State,
Page 95 and 96:
P. BREATH TEST ADMISSIBLE AS PROOF
Page 97 and 98:
T. LOSS OF NORMAL & PER SE LAW EVID
Page 99 and 100:
fesf resu/fs were not inflammatory
Page 101 and 102:
6. IMPROPER ADMISSION OF EXTRAPOLAT
Page 103 and 104:
esu/fs. As long as fhe operator kno
Page 105 and 106:
suggesf that he was physically or m
Page 107 and 108:
D. PROCEDURE FOR TAKING BLOOD SAMPL
Page 109 and 110:
Thurman v. State, 861 S.W.2d 96 (Te
Page 111 and 112:
4. NOT NECESSARY TO SHOW WHO DREW T
Page 113 and 114:
Biqon v. State, 252 S.W.3d 360 (Tex
Page 115 and 116:
offense of DWI," the Court finds th
Page 117 and 118:
8. SEARCH WARRANT AFFIDAVIT CONTAIN
Page 119 and 120:
(b) FArAL Farhart v. State, 337 S.W
Page 121 and 122:
consenfs, 724.012 does not apply. H
Page 123 and 124:
in the Sfafe's case-in-chief, the S
Page 125 and 126:
was not the result of an involuntar
Page 127 and 128:
trance-like high. The Court affirme
Page 129 and 130:
C. CHARGE ON WORKING CONDITION OF I
Page 131 and 132:
intoxication sefs forfh alternative
Page 133 and 134:
of Appeals had misconstrued the act
Page 135 and 136:
the impairment element of the Sfafe
Page 137 and 138:
Sledqe v. State ,1994 WL 247961 (Te
Page 139 and 140: V. WHEN CHARGE SPECIFICALLY USES SU
Page 141 and 142: Tennerv v. State, 680 S.W.2d 629 (T
Page 143 and 144: E. ENHANCEMENT OF FELONY DWI WITH N
Page 145 and 146: Also, if stipulated that there are
Page 147 and 148: of the priors. He then complained o
Page 149 and 150: K. PROPER TO ALLEGE DATE PROBATION
Page 151 and 152: o. IF YOU ALLEGE MORE PRIOR DWI'S T
Page 153 and 154: a violation of the ex posf facto la
Page 155 and 156: W. EXPUNCTION WILL NOT ALWAYS RENDE
Page 157 and 158: intoxicated (DWI) from a C/ass B mi
Page 159 and 160: Holmberq v. State, 931 S.W.2d 3(Tex
Page 161 and 162: G. NO CONFLICT BETWEEN N'DUI'' AND
Page 163 and 164: equipment was obserued in the vehic
Page 165 and 166: unning, radio playing loudly, and d
Page 167 and 168: wheels was consr.stent with the whe
Page 169 and 170: Wriqht v. State, 932 S.W.2d 572 (Te
Page 171 and 172: Bucek v. State ,724 S.W .2d 129 (Te
Page 173 and 174: concerning how recently the vehicle
Page 175 and 176: B. DENIAL OF PROBATION DUE TO LANGU
Page 177 and 178: alcohol by calling a sysfem adminis
Page 179 and 180: Avfor v. State, 2011 WL 1659887 (Te
Page 181 and 182: Carrasco v. State,712S.W.2d 120 (Te
Page 183 and 184: Drapkin v. State, 781 S.W.2d 710 (T
Page 185 and 186: Folev v. State, 327 S.W.3d 907 (Tex
Page 187 and 188: (Tex.Crim.App. 1988)..... .......42
Page 189: Human v. State, 749 S.W.2d 832 {Tex
Page 193 and 194: Moncivais v. State, 2O02WL 1445200
Page 195 and 196: Poncev. State,828 S.W.2d 50 (Tex.Ap
Page 197 and 198: Schaum v. State, 833 S.W.2d 644 (Te
Page 199 and 200: State v. Gerstenkom, 239 S.W.3d 357
Page 201 and 202: Stone v. State, 685 S.W.2d 791 (Tex
Page 203 and 204: Vasquezv. State,2007WL 2417373 (Tex
show all

Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?