Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...
Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...
Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
K,<br />
L.<br />
M.<br />
N.<br />
o.<br />
P.<br />
o.<br />
R.<br />
NOSOUND=NOPROBLEM .<br />
MOBILE VIDEO CAMERA TAPE ADMISSIBLE<br />
STATE MAY SUBPOENA/OFFER DEFENDANT'S COPY<br />
LOSING VIDEOTAPE BETWEEN TRIAL AND APPEAL DOES NOT<br />
REQUIRE NEW TRIAL<br />
PROBLEM OF OTHER STOPS BEING VISIBLE ON DWITAPE<br />
VIDEO PART OF TAPE MAY BE ADMISSIBLE WITHOUT<br />
OPERATOR'S TESTIMONY . .<br />
INABILITY TO ID ALL BACKGROUND VOICES NOT A PROBLEM<br />
OFFICER'S NARRATIVE ON PERFORMANCE OF FST'S<br />
1. CUMULATIVE ....<br />
2. INADMISSIBLE HEARSAY<br />
x. IN.COURT DEMONSTRATIONS/EXHIBITS<br />
A.<br />
B.<br />
c.<br />
D.<br />
E.<br />
FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS<br />
SMELL TEST<br />
SMELL & TASTE TEST .<br />
CHART OF SYMPTOMS OF INTOXICATION INADMISSIBLE<br />
CHART O F SYM PTOMS OF I NTOXI CATI ON-D EMONSTRATIVE<br />
EVIDENCE<br />
F.<br />
G.<br />
DEMONSTRATION OF DEFENDANT'S SPEECH . . . .<br />
ERROR TO ALLOW BOTTLE OF VODKA TO BE ADMITTED<br />
AS DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE<br />
xt.<br />
xil.<br />
xv.<br />
ONE WITNESS SUFFICIENT (OPINION TESTIMONN<br />
IMPEACHING POLIGE OFFICER<br />
A. FINANCIAL MOTIVE<br />
B. QUOTAS<br />
C. EMPLOYMENTANDDISCIPLINARYHISTORY ....:.<br />
IMPEACHING DEFENDANT AND BOND FORFEITURE EVIDENCE<br />
A. PROPER<br />
B.<br />
c.<br />
IMPROPER<br />
EVIDENCE OF BOND FORFEITURE ADMISSIBLE<br />
STATEMENTS BY DEFENDANT<br />
A. PRE-ARREST STATEMENTS . .<br />
1. ADMISSIBLE ....<br />
B.<br />
c.<br />
D.<br />
2. INADMISSIBLE, "CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION'' ... . .<br />
"MIMNDAWARNINGS'- RECITATION MUST BE ACCURATE . .<br />
ACCIDENT REPORTS STATUTE HAS NO EFFECT ON ADMISSIBILITY<br />
OF DRIVER'S ORAL STATEMENTS<br />
DOES HANDCUFFING DEFENDANT PLACE HIM IN "CUSTODT<br />
FOR MIRANDA PURPOSES? .<br />
1. NO ..<br />
E,<br />
F.<br />
VtrE tLv..<br />
STATEMENTS ABOUT DRUG USE INADMISSIBLE WITHOUT<br />
EXPERTTESTIMONY....<br />
STATEMENTS BY DEFENDANT'S HUSBAND - NOT HEARSAY<br />
FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS<br />
A. HORIZONTALGMENYSTAGMUS ....<br />
1. IS ADMISSIBLE<br />
l_v<br />
45<br />
45<br />
45<br />
45<br />
45<br />
46<br />
46<br />
47<br />
47<br />
47<br />
47<br />
47<br />
47<br />
48<br />
48<br />
48<br />
48<br />
48<br />
49<br />
49<br />
49<br />
49<br />
49<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
51<br />
51<br />
51<br />
54<br />
55<br />
55<br />
55<br />
55<br />
55<br />
56<br />
56<br />
56<br />
56<br />
56