Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...
Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...
Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Hall v. State, 649 S.W.2d 627 (Tex.Crim.App. 1983).<br />
Motorist's consent to breath test held not to be voluntary when officer said, "You're automatically<br />
convicted of DWI and your license will be suspended if you refuse to give a breath sample."<br />
K. BREATH TEST REFUSAL EVIDENCE<br />
1. AS EVIDENCE OF GUILT<br />
Mody v. State, 2 S.W.3d 652 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet ref'd).<br />
Finley v. State, 809 S.W.2d 909 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist] 1991, pet. ref'd).<br />
Jury can consider BIR as evidence of defendant's guilt.<br />
2. NO VIOLATION OF sTH AMENDMENT<br />
Gressett v. State, 669 S.W.2d748 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1983), aff d,723 S.W.2d 695 (Tex.Crim.App.<br />
1986).<br />
Evidence of a defendant's refusal to submit to blood alcohol test after lawful request by police<br />
officer is admissible at trial when intoxication rs an I'ssue<br />
Bass v. State ,723 S.W .2d 687 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986).<br />
tn the context of an arrest for driving while intoxicated, a potice inquiry of whether the suspect wilt<br />
take a blood fesf rs not an interrogation within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment.<br />
SEE also Shepherd v. State, 915 S.W.2d 177 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1996, pet. ref'd).<br />
3. REASON FOR REFUSAL AND CONDITION OF INSTRUMENT<br />
IRRELEVANT<br />
Mody v. State, 2 S.W.3d 652 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet ref'd).<br />
Moore v. State, 981 S.W.2d701(Tex.App.-Houston [1"tDist.] 1998, pet. ref'd).<br />
Evidence of defendant's refusal to take a breath fesf was properly admifted, and State had no<br />
preadmiftance burden to show that defendant was over .10 at the time of driving, why the<br />
defendant refused, or that instrument was accurate.<br />
77