Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...
Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...
Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
anyone other than officer to help him, and officer's belief that defendant needed help was<br />
objectively reasonable.<br />
Mu noz v. State,, 201 0 W L 330 4242 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 201 0).<br />
Where defendant was obserued traveting at almost hatf the posted speed limit, and putling into the<br />
parking lot of closed busrness alone in her car and absent the officer had no access fo asslsfance,<br />
it was a proper community caretaking sfop. Police officer's sfop of defendant's vehicle to determine<br />
if she was /osf was reasonable exercrse of his community caretaking function. Even though the<br />
fourth factor, whether she posed a danger to herself or others ffnof assisfed, weighs against the<br />
application of the community caretaking function, "not all factors must support the application of<br />
the exception in determining whether the officer acted reasonably in exercising his community<br />
caretaking funciton."<br />
Chilman v. State, 22 S.W:3d 50 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist] 2000, pet. ref'd.).<br />
Around 2:00 a.m., the officer observed a red car stopped in front of a banicade erected to block<br />
campus entrance. The officer did not know when the red car had pulled up to the banicade<br />
although he knew the car was not there when he passed by the same spot twenty minutes earlier.<br />
Officerobseruedthe passenger/eavethe red car and surueythe barricadetothe campusentrance.<br />
ln an effort to determine what the car's occupants were doing on campus and possibly to provide<br />
some assr.sfance because they appeared to be lost, officer turned on his patrol car's emergency<br />
equipment. This action prompted fhe passenger to jump back into the red car. When the officer<br />
approached, the Defendant who was in the driver's seat, asked the officer why he had stopped him<br />
and declared that there was no reason to stop him. After determining the Defendant was<br />
intoxicated, the officer arrested him for DWI. Stop held to be justified.<br />
Hulit v. State, 982 S.W.2d 431(Tex. Crim. App. 1998).<br />
Police were dispatched rn response to a report of a "woman possibly having a heart attack in a<br />
vehicle." Officer found a pickup truck sitting in the inside lane of a seruice road about fifty feet from<br />
an intersection and saw an individual slumped over the steering wheel of the truck. The truck<br />
engine was still running and the windows were rolled up. The officer approached the vehicle and<br />
began rapping on the window and yelling at the driver to wake up. With the assrsfance of a second<br />
officer, the driver awakened and opened the door of the pickup. The testifying officer smelled<br />
alcohol about the driver. Once the driver got out of the truck at the officer's request, the truck began<br />
rolling bacl