Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Reidweq v. State, 981 S.W.2d 399 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1998, pdr. refd) . . 99,117 Revnolds V. State, 163 S.W.3d 808 (Tex.App. Amarillo 2005) affirmed other grounds 204 S.W.3D 386 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006) . ...... 59 Revnoldsv. State,204S.W.3d 388(Tex.Crim.App.2006) ........ 88 Revnoldsv. State,4s.W.3d 13(Tex.Crim.App.1999) ..... 144 Revnoldsv. State,744s.W.2d 156 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1987, pet. refd) . . . . . . . 156 Reynolds v. State, 902 S.W.2d 558 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1995, pet. refd) . . . . . . 36 Rhodes v. State, 945 S.W.2d 115 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997) . . . . 55 Richardson v. State,2004WL292662 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2004, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) . . . . . . 127 Richardsonv. State,39S.W.3d634(Tex.App.-Amarillo2000, no pet.) . ........ 30 Rivera v. State, 957 S.W.2d 636 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1997, pet. refd) . . . . . 133 Rizo v. State, 963 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.App.-Eastland 1998, no pet.) . . . . . . 135 Roane v. State, 2010 WL 3399036 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2010, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) . . . 150 Robles v. State, 85 S.W.3d 211 (Tex.Crim.App. 2002) . . . . 131 Rodriouezv.State, 631 S.W.2d515(Tex.Crim.App. 1982) ....... 66 Rodriquez v. State, 18 S.W.3d 228 (Tex.Crim.App.2000) . . 116 Rodriquez v. State, 2005 WL 2313567 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2005, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) . . . . . 109 Rodriquez v. State, 232 S.W.3d 55 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007) . . 100 Rodriquez v. State, 31 S.W.3d 359 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2000, pet. refd) . . . . 133 Romo v. State, 577 S.W.2d 251 (Tex.Crim.App. 1979) . . 19,37 Rousev.State,651 S.W.2d736(Tex.Crim.App. [panelop.] 1983) ........ 63 Rowe v. State, 2004 WL 1050693 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2004, pet. refd) (Not designated for publication) . . . 146 Rowland v. State,983 S.W.2d 58 (Tex.App.-Houston {1't Dist.} 1998, pet. ref'd} . ........ 70 Rov v. State, 608 S.W.2d 645 (Tex.Crim.App. [panel op.] 1980) . . . . 39 Ruiz v. State, 907 S.W.2d 600 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1995, no pet.) . . . 19 Salzido v. State,2011WL1796431(Tex.App.-Amarillo 2011,pel. refd) . . . . . . . 101 Sanchez v. State,20'l'l WL 1936064 (Tex.App.- Houston [1"tDist] 2011) . . . . . . 104 Sanders v. State, 936 S.W.2d 436 (Tex.App.-Austin 1996, pet. ref'd) ....... 2 Sandoval v. State 17 S.W.3d 792, (Tex.App.-Austin, 2000, pet. refd.) . . . . 74 Savaqe v. State, 933 S.W.2d 497(Tex.Crim.App. 1996) . . . 161 Sawver v. State, 2009 WL 722256 (Tex.App.-Austin 2009, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) . . . . . 20 1-82
Schaum v. State, 833 S.W.2d 644 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1992, no pet.) . . . . . . 69 Schillitani v. State, 2009 WL 3126332 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2009). Vacated & remanded 2010 WL 2606485 (Tex.Crim.App.2010) ...... 158 Schmidtv.State,20l0WL 4354027 (Tex.App.-Beaumont2010) . ...... 107 Schomick v. State, 2010 WL 4570047 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2010) . . . . . 101 Scillitaniv. State,343 S.W.bd 914 (Tex.App.-Houston [1a Dist.] 2011) . . . . . 89, 159 Scott v. State, 564 S.W.2d 759 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978) . . . . . . 54 Seaton v. State, 718 S.W.2d 870 (Tex.App.-Austin 1986, no pet.) . . . . . . 129 Sesura v. State, 826 S.W.2d 178 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1992, pel refd) . . . . . . 36 Seftlemirev. State,323S.W.3d520(Tex.App.-FortWorth2010) ........ 33 Shafer v. State, 919 S.W.2d 885 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1996, pet. refd) . . 109 Shaub v. State, 99 S.W.3d 253 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2003, no pet.) . . . . . 64 Shepherd v. State,915 S.W.2d 177 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1996, pet. ref'd) . .... 54,77 Shirlev v. <strong>Texas</strong> Deoartment of Public Safetv , 974 S.W.2d 321 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1998, no pet.) . . . . 71 Sierra v. State, 280 S.W.3d 25b fiex.Crim.App. 2009) . . . . 117 Sims v. State, ZSS S.W.ZO 913 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1 987, pet. refd) . 1 , gg, 117 Sinqletonv.State.9l S.W.3d342(Tex.App.-Texarkana,2002, reh.overruled) ..... .... 35 Skinner v. State. 2006 WL 1420388 (Tex.App.-Tyler 2006, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) . . . . . 92 Sledqe v. State,1994 WL 247961(Tex.App.-Dallas June 9, 1994, no pet.)(Not designated for publication) . . . . . 123 Smith v. State, 1 S.W.3d 261 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1999, pet refd) . . . . . 137 Smith v. State, 12 S.W.3d 149 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2000, pet. refd) . . . . . . 130 Smith v. State, 158 S.W.3d 463 (Tex.Crim.App.2005) . . . . . 132 Smith v. State, 207 S.W.3d 787 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006) . . . . 102 Smith v. State,65S.W.3d 332 (Tex.App.-Waco2001, no pet.).. ..... 57,58 Smithv.State,866S.W.2d731 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.]1993, nopet.) . ........ 81 Smithey v. State, 85O S.W.2d 204 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1993, pet. ref'd) . ....... 114 Snokhousv. State,2010WL 1930088 (Tex.App.-Austin 2010, no pet.)(Notdesignated forpublication)........ 56 Sparksv.State'943S.W.2d513(Tex.App._FortWorth1997,pet.ref,d}. Spauldinqv. State,896S.W.2d 587(Tex.App.-Houston [lstDist] 1995, no pet.).. ..... 128 Spebarv. State, 121 S.W.3d 61 (Tex.App.-San Antonio, September3,2003,no pet.) . . . . 99 Spence v. State, 2009 WL 3720179 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2009, pet refd) (Not designated for publication) . . . . 110 1_83
Page 1 and 2:
Driving While Intoxicated Case Law
Page 3 and 4:
2. DOESN'T APPLY 18 F. OFFICER'S AR
Page 5 and 6:
K, L. M. N. o. P. o. R. NOSOUND=NOP
Page 7 and 8:
F. G. H, L J. K. L. 3. NO RIGHT TO
Page 9 and 10:
C. D. STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR DR
Page 11 and 12:
E, F. G. H. t. J. K. L. M. N. o. P.
Page 13 and 14:
O. IF YOU ALLEGE MORE PRIOR DWI'S T
Page 15 and 16:
I. INFORMATION/CHARGING INSTRUMENT
Page 17 and 18:
B. IMPROPER QUESTION/STATEMENT Hark
Page 19 and 20:
DWI ROADBLOCKS A. ARE ILLEGAL Holt
Page 21 and 22:
V. OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE CHART The f
Page 23 and 24:
Elisibilitv for Occupational Driver
Page 25 and 26:
Villarealv. State, 2008 WL 4367616
Page 27 and 28:
out that hearsay is generally admis
Page 29 and 30:
Foster v. State, 326 S.W.3d 609 (Te
Page 31 and 32:
anyone other than officer to help h
Page 33 and 34:
F. OFFICER'S ARREST AUTHORITY WHEN
Page 35 and 36:
occur) who observed the traffic off
Page 37 and 38:
a mile in the early morning hours.
Page 39 and 40:
State v. Arriaqa, 5 S.W.3d 804 (Tex
Page 41 and 42:
explain the margin of error or the
Page 43 and 44:
P. "FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY''- SUFFIC
Page 45 and 46:
defendant from leaving. Officer sai
Page 47 and 48:
2. REASONABLE Bohren v. State,2011W
Page 49 and 50:
Sinqleton v. State. 91 S.W.3d 342 (
Page 51 and 52:
B. BASED ON'BREACH OF PEACE'THEORY
Page 53 and 54:
IX. VIDEO A. PARTS OF PREDICATE CAN
Page 55 and 56:
Mathieu v. State, 992 S.W.2d725 (Te
Page 57 and 58:
F. ABSENCE OF VIDEOTAPE 1. NOT GROU
Page 59 and 60:
K. NO SOUND = NO PROBLEM Aouirre v.
Page 61 and 62:
R. OFFICER'S NARRATIVE ON PERFORMAN
Page 63 and 64:
was effor, albeit harmless, to allo
Page 65 and 66:
forfeited in the guilt-innocence ph
Page 67 and 68:
ecoming the focus of a DWI investig
Page 69 and 70:
Rasan v. State,642S.W.2d 489 (Tex.C
Page 71 and 72:
2. OFFICER DOES NOT HAVE TO BE AN O
Page 73 and 74:
the reliability of VGN before it is
Page 75 and 76:
C. WALK AND TURN = LAY WITNESS TEST
Page 77 and 78:
G. FAILURE TO EXPLAIN FST'S IN DEFE
Page 79 and 80:
B. PROOF OF "STATE'' Barton v. Stat
Page 81 and 82:
C. INSTRUMENT CERTIFICATION 1, NEW
Page 83 and 84:
G. DIC.23 & DIC.24 WARNINGS 1. REQU
Page 85 and 86:
warning on refusing alcoholfesfs, b
Page 87 and 88:
efusing or of giving a sample for s
Page 89 and 90:
2. NO EVIDENCE THAT ADDITIONAL WARN
Page 91 and 92:
Hall v. State, 649 S.W.2d 627 (Tex.
Page 93 and 94:
3. AFTER 2 HOURS Holloway v. State,
Page 95 and 96:
P. BREATH TEST ADMISSIBLE AS PROOF
Page 97 and 98:
T. LOSS OF NORMAL & PER SE LAW EVID
Page 99 and 100:
fesf resu/fs were not inflammatory
Page 101 and 102:
6. IMPROPER ADMISSION OF EXTRAPOLAT
Page 103 and 104:
esu/fs. As long as fhe operator kno
Page 105 and 106:
suggesf that he was physically or m
Page 107 and 108:
D. PROCEDURE FOR TAKING BLOOD SAMPL
Page 109 and 110:
Thurman v. State, 861 S.W.2d 96 (Te
Page 111 and 112:
4. NOT NECESSARY TO SHOW WHO DREW T
Page 113 and 114:
Biqon v. State, 252 S.W.3d 360 (Tex
Page 115 and 116:
offense of DWI," the Court finds th
Page 117 and 118:
8. SEARCH WARRANT AFFIDAVIT CONTAIN
Page 119 and 120:
(b) FArAL Farhart v. State, 337 S.W
Page 121 and 122:
consenfs, 724.012 does not apply. H
Page 123 and 124:
in the Sfafe's case-in-chief, the S
Page 125 and 126:
was not the result of an involuntar
Page 127 and 128:
trance-like high. The Court affirme
Page 129 and 130:
C. CHARGE ON WORKING CONDITION OF I
Page 131 and 132:
intoxication sefs forfh alternative
Page 133 and 134:
of Appeals had misconstrued the act
Page 135 and 136:
the impairment element of the Sfafe
Page 137 and 138:
Sledqe v. State ,1994 WL 247961 (Te
Page 139 and 140:
V. WHEN CHARGE SPECIFICALLY USES SU
Page 141 and 142:
Tennerv v. State, 680 S.W.2d 629 (T
Page 143 and 144:
E. ENHANCEMENT OF FELONY DWI WITH N
Page 145 and 146: Also, if stipulated that there are
Page 147 and 148: of the priors. He then complained o
Page 149 and 150: K. PROPER TO ALLEGE DATE PROBATION
Page 151 and 152: o. IF YOU ALLEGE MORE PRIOR DWI'S T
Page 153 and 154: a violation of the ex posf facto la
Page 155 and 156: W. EXPUNCTION WILL NOT ALWAYS RENDE
Page 157 and 158: intoxicated (DWI) from a C/ass B mi
Page 159 and 160: Holmberq v. State, 931 S.W.2d 3(Tex
Page 161 and 162: G. NO CONFLICT BETWEEN N'DUI'' AND
Page 163 and 164: equipment was obserued in the vehic
Page 165 and 166: unning, radio playing loudly, and d
Page 167 and 168: wheels was consr.stent with the whe
Page 169 and 170: Wriqht v. State, 932 S.W.2d 572 (Te
Page 171 and 172: Bucek v. State ,724 S.W .2d 129 (Te
Page 173 and 174: concerning how recently the vehicle
Page 175 and 176: B. DENIAL OF PROBATION DUE TO LANGU
Page 177 and 178: alcohol by calling a sysfem adminis
Page 179 and 180: Avfor v. State, 2011 WL 1659887 (Te
Page 181 and 182: Carrasco v. State,712S.W.2d 120 (Te
Page 183 and 184: Drapkin v. State, 781 S.W.2d 710 (T
Page 185 and 186: Folev v. State, 327 S.W.3d 907 (Tex
Page 187 and 188: (Tex.Crim.App. 1988)..... .......42
Page 189 and 190: Human v. State, 749 S.W.2d 832 {Tex
Page 191 and 192: Lewisv.State,72S.W.3d704(Tex.App.-F
Page 193 and 194: Moncivais v. State, 2O02WL 1445200
Page 195: Poncev. State,828 S.W.2d 50 (Tex.Ap
Page 199 and 200: State v. Gerstenkom, 239 S.W.3d 357
Page 201 and 202: Stone v. State, 685 S.W.2d 791 (Tex
Page 203 and 204: Vasquezv. State,2007WL 2417373 (Tex
show all

Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?