Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Martin v. State, 200 S.W.3d 635, (Tex.Crim.App. 2006) . . . 132 Martin v. State , 724 S.W .2d 1 35 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1987, no pet.) . . . . 78 Martin v. State, 84 S.W.3d 267 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2002, pet refd) . . . . 131 Martinezv. State,2005W1787075 (Tex.App.-ElPaso2005)(Notdesignatedforpublication) .. ....... 69 Martinezv.State,2010WL 188734 (Tex.App.-Dallas20'10) ...... ...... 14 Martinezv. State,2011WL2555712 (Tex.Crim.App.2011\ ....... 14 Massiev.State,744S.W.2d314(Tex.App.-Dallas1988,pet.refd). ..53,65 Matav. State,46s.W.3d 902(Tex.Crim.App.2001) ....... 86 Mathieu v. State,992 S.W.2d 725 (Tex.App.-Houston [1$ Dist.]1999, no pet.) .. ...... 36,41 Maxwell v. State, 253 S.W.3d 309 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth, 2008, pet. refd) . . . . 61, 67 Mavsonet v. State, 91 S.W.3d 365 (Tex.App.-Texarkana, October 16,2002, pet. refd) . . . 26 McBridev.State,946S.W.2d100(Tex.App.-Texarkana1997,pet.refd) . ....:....... 70 McCaffertvv. State,748S.W.2d489(Tex.App.-Houston [1$Dist] 1988, no pet.).. ..... 158 McC0v v. State, 877 S.W.2d 844 (Tex.App.-Eastland 1994, no pet.) . . . . . . 2 McDuff v. State,2011WL 1849540 (Tex.App.-ElPaso 2011) .... ....... 12 McGintv v. State, 740 S.W.2d 475 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, pet. refd) . . . . 1, 117 McKinnon v. State,2004Wl878278 (Tex..App.-Dallas2004, pet. refd)(Notdesignated forpublication) ........ 4 McKinnon v. State, 709 S.W.2d 805 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1986, no pet.) . . . 67, 112 Mclain v. State,984 S.W.2d 70O (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1998, pet. ref'd) .... 71 McRae v. State, 152 S.W.3d 739 (Tex.App.-Houston [1"tDist.] December 02,2004, pet. refd) . . . . . . 59, 60 Meadowsv. State,2111WL5535243(Tex.App.-Texarkana 2011). .. 35, 105 Mendoza v. State, 2006 WL 2328508 (Tex.App.-El Paso, 2006, pdr refd) (not designated for publication) . . . . . 141 Meverv. State,78 S.W.3d 505 (Tex.App.-Austin 2002,pet. refd) . . . . . . . 43 Mifam v. State, 976 S.W.2d 788 (Tex.App.-Houston [1"tDist.] 1998, no pet.) . . . . 154 Millerv. State,341 S.W.2d 440 (Tex.Crim.App. 1960) . . . . . 116 Mil|sv.State'99S.W.3d200(Tex.App._FortWorth2002,pet'refd.) Mireles v. State, 9 S.W.3d 128 (<strong>Texas</strong> 1999) . . . . . . . 84 Mitchelf v. State, 187 S.W.3d 113 (Tex.App. -Waco 2006, pet. refd) . . . . . 12 Mitchellv. State,821 S.W.2d 420 (Tex.App.-Austin 1991, pet. refd) . . ... 90 Modv v. State, 2 S.W.3d 652 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet refd) . . . . . 77 Molina v. State, 2010 WL 980560 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2010) . . . . . 149 1"7 8
Moncivais v. State, 2O02WL 1445200 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2002, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) 110 Moore v. State, 916 S.W.2d 696 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1996, no pet.) . . . . 140 Moorev.State,981 S.W.2d701 (Tex.App.-Houston[1$Dist.] 1998, pet. refd) . ........ 77 Morenov.State,124S.W.3d339,(Tex.App._CorpusChristi2003,nopet.) Monis v. State, 2011 WL 1743769 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2011) . . . . . . . . . 30 Morisv.State,897S.W.2d528(Tex.App.-ElPaso 1995, nopet.).. ..... 54 Mosquedav.State,936S.W.2d714(Tex.App.-FortWorth1996,nopet.).. ......135 Munozv. State,2010WL 3304242 (Tex.App.-FortWorth 2010) . ........ 17 Murphvv. State,44 S.W.3d 656(Tex.App.-Austin 2001, no pet.) .. ..... Murravv.State,245S.W.3d37(Tex.App-Austin2007,pet.refd) . ...... 95 Neaves v. State, 767 S.W.2d 784 (Tex.Crim.App. 1989) . . . 114 Nebes v. State, 743 S.W.2d 729 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, no pet.) . . . . . . . . . . 69 Nelson v. State, 149 S.W.3d 206 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2004, no pet.) . . . . . 111,120 Ness y. State, 152 S.W.3d 759 (Tex.App.-Houston [1 <strong>District</strong>] December 2, 2004, pet. refd.) . . . . 74 Nevarez v. State, 671 S.W.2d 90 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1984, no pet.) . . . . . . 10 Newberrvv. State,552S.W.2d457(Tex.Crim.App. 1977) ........ 54 Newefl v. State, 2005 WL 2838539, (Tex.App.- Fort Worth, 2005, no pet.) (not designated for publication) . . . . 152 Nquvenv. State,2010WL2518250 (Tex.App.-Houston [14Dist.]2010, nopet.).. ..... 102 Nichofsv.State,877S.W.2d494{Tex.App.-FortWorth1994,pet.ref'd} . .......155 Nieschwietz v. State, 2006 WL 1684739 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2006, pet. refd.) . . . . . . 148 Nottinqhamv.State,908S.W.2d585(Tex.App.-Austin 1995, nopet.) .. ..... 70,92 Noves v. State, 2007 WL 470452(Tex.App.-Houston [14s Dist.] 2007, nopet.)(Not designated for publication) . 109 Nunez v. State, 2007 WL 1299241 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2007, no pet.) (not designated for publication) . . . . . . 125 Ochoav. State, 119S.W.3d 825(Tex.App..-SanAntonio2003, no pet.) . ...... 118 Ochoa v. State, 481 S.W.2d 847 (Tex.Crim.App.1972) . . . . . 50 Ochoa v. State, 994 S.W.2d 283 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1999, no pet.) . . . . . . 26 Oqazv. State,2005WL2898139(Tex.App.-FortWorth2005, no pet.)(Notdesignatedforpublication)....... 135 Oqden v. State,2004WL314916 (Tex.App,-Austin 2004, no pet.) (Notdesignated forpublication) .... . . . . . . . . 36 Oquntopev.State,177S.W.3d435(Tex.App.-Houston[1$Dist.]2005,nopet.) .. ...... 61 Oliphantv. State,764 S.W.2d 858 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1989, pet. refd) . . . . 16 Oop v. State, 36 S.W.3d 158 (Tex.App.-Houston [1"tDist.] 2000, pet. refd) . . . . . . 39 L79 '120
Page 1 and 2:
Driving While Intoxicated Case Law
Page 3 and 4:
2. DOESN'T APPLY 18 F. OFFICER'S AR
Page 5 and 6:
K, L. M. N. o. P. o. R. NOSOUND=NOP
Page 7 and 8:
F. G. H, L J. K. L. 3. NO RIGHT TO
Page 9 and 10:
C. D. STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR DR
Page 11 and 12:
E, F. G. H. t. J. K. L. M. N. o. P.
Page 13 and 14:
O. IF YOU ALLEGE MORE PRIOR DWI'S T
Page 15 and 16:
I. INFORMATION/CHARGING INSTRUMENT
Page 17 and 18:
B. IMPROPER QUESTION/STATEMENT Hark
Page 19 and 20:
DWI ROADBLOCKS A. ARE ILLEGAL Holt
Page 21 and 22:
V. OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE CHART The f
Page 23 and 24:
Elisibilitv for Occupational Driver
Page 25 and 26:
Villarealv. State, 2008 WL 4367616
Page 27 and 28:
out that hearsay is generally admis
Page 29 and 30:
Foster v. State, 326 S.W.3d 609 (Te
Page 31 and 32:
anyone other than officer to help h
Page 33 and 34:
F. OFFICER'S ARREST AUTHORITY WHEN
Page 35 and 36:
occur) who observed the traffic off
Page 37 and 38:
a mile in the early morning hours.
Page 39 and 40:
State v. Arriaqa, 5 S.W.3d 804 (Tex
Page 41 and 42:
explain the margin of error or the
Page 43 and 44:
P. "FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY''- SUFFIC
Page 45 and 46:
defendant from leaving. Officer sai
Page 47 and 48:
2. REASONABLE Bohren v. State,2011W
Page 49 and 50:
Sinqleton v. State. 91 S.W.3d 342 (
Page 51 and 52:
B. BASED ON'BREACH OF PEACE'THEORY
Page 53 and 54:
IX. VIDEO A. PARTS OF PREDICATE CAN
Page 55 and 56:
Mathieu v. State, 992 S.W.2d725 (Te
Page 57 and 58:
F. ABSENCE OF VIDEOTAPE 1. NOT GROU
Page 59 and 60:
K. NO SOUND = NO PROBLEM Aouirre v.
Page 61 and 62:
R. OFFICER'S NARRATIVE ON PERFORMAN
Page 63 and 64:
was effor, albeit harmless, to allo
Page 65 and 66:
forfeited in the guilt-innocence ph
Page 67 and 68:
ecoming the focus of a DWI investig
Page 69 and 70:
Rasan v. State,642S.W.2d 489 (Tex.C
Page 71 and 72:
2. OFFICER DOES NOT HAVE TO BE AN O
Page 73 and 74:
the reliability of VGN before it is
Page 75 and 76:
C. WALK AND TURN = LAY WITNESS TEST
Page 77 and 78:
G. FAILURE TO EXPLAIN FST'S IN DEFE
Page 79 and 80:
B. PROOF OF "STATE'' Barton v. Stat
Page 81 and 82:
C. INSTRUMENT CERTIFICATION 1, NEW
Page 83 and 84:
G. DIC.23 & DIC.24 WARNINGS 1. REQU
Page 85 and 86:
warning on refusing alcoholfesfs, b
Page 87 and 88:
efusing or of giving a sample for s
Page 89 and 90:
2. NO EVIDENCE THAT ADDITIONAL WARN
Page 91 and 92:
Hall v. State, 649 S.W.2d 627 (Tex.
Page 93 and 94:
3. AFTER 2 HOURS Holloway v. State,
Page 95 and 96:
P. BREATH TEST ADMISSIBLE AS PROOF
Page 97 and 98:
T. LOSS OF NORMAL & PER SE LAW EVID
Page 99 and 100:
fesf resu/fs were not inflammatory
Page 101 and 102:
6. IMPROPER ADMISSION OF EXTRAPOLAT
Page 103 and 104:
esu/fs. As long as fhe operator kno
Page 105 and 106:
suggesf that he was physically or m
Page 107 and 108:
D. PROCEDURE FOR TAKING BLOOD SAMPL
Page 109 and 110:
Thurman v. State, 861 S.W.2d 96 (Te
Page 111 and 112:
4. NOT NECESSARY TO SHOW WHO DREW T
Page 113 and 114:
Biqon v. State, 252 S.W.3d 360 (Tex
Page 115 and 116:
offense of DWI," the Court finds th
Page 117 and 118:
8. SEARCH WARRANT AFFIDAVIT CONTAIN
Page 119 and 120:
(b) FArAL Farhart v. State, 337 S.W
Page 121 and 122:
consenfs, 724.012 does not apply. H
Page 123 and 124:
in the Sfafe's case-in-chief, the S
Page 125 and 126:
was not the result of an involuntar
Page 127 and 128:
trance-like high. The Court affirme
Page 129 and 130:
C. CHARGE ON WORKING CONDITION OF I
Page 131 and 132:
intoxication sefs forfh alternative
Page 133 and 134:
of Appeals had misconstrued the act
Page 135 and 136:
the impairment element of the Sfafe
Page 137 and 138:
Sledqe v. State ,1994 WL 247961 (Te
Page 139 and 140:
V. WHEN CHARGE SPECIFICALLY USES SU
Page 141 and 142: Tennerv v. State, 680 S.W.2d 629 (T
Page 143 and 144: E. ENHANCEMENT OF FELONY DWI WITH N
Page 145 and 146: Also, if stipulated that there are
Page 147 and 148: of the priors. He then complained o
Page 149 and 150: K. PROPER TO ALLEGE DATE PROBATION
Page 151 and 152: o. IF YOU ALLEGE MORE PRIOR DWI'S T
Page 153 and 154: a violation of the ex posf facto la
Page 155 and 156: W. EXPUNCTION WILL NOT ALWAYS RENDE
Page 157 and 158: intoxicated (DWI) from a C/ass B mi
Page 159 and 160: Holmberq v. State, 931 S.W.2d 3(Tex
Page 161 and 162: G. NO CONFLICT BETWEEN N'DUI'' AND
Page 163 and 164: equipment was obserued in the vehic
Page 165 and 166: unning, radio playing loudly, and d
Page 167 and 168: wheels was consr.stent with the whe
Page 169 and 170: Wriqht v. State, 932 S.W.2d 572 (Te
Page 171 and 172: Bucek v. State ,724 S.W .2d 129 (Te
Page 173 and 174: concerning how recently the vehicle
Page 175 and 176: B. DENIAL OF PROBATION DUE TO LANGU
Page 177 and 178: alcohol by calling a sysfem adminis
Page 179 and 180: Avfor v. State, 2011 WL 1659887 (Te
Page 181 and 182: Carrasco v. State,712S.W.2d 120 (Te
Page 183 and 184: Drapkin v. State, 781 S.W.2d 710 (T
Page 185 and 186: Folev v. State, 327 S.W.3d 907 (Tex
Page 187 and 188: (Tex.Crim.App. 1988)..... .......42
Page 189 and 190: Human v. State, 749 S.W.2d 832 {Tex
Page 191: Lewisv.State,72S.W.3d704(Tex.App.-F
Page 195 and 196: Poncev. State,828 S.W.2d 50 (Tex.Ap
Page 197 and 198: Schaum v. State, 833 S.W.2d 644 (Te
Page 199 and 200: State v. Gerstenkom, 239 S.W.3d 357
Page 201 and 202: Stone v. State, 685 S.W.2d 791 (Tex
Page 203 and 204: Vasquezv. State,2007WL 2417373 (Tex
show all

Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?