Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Orona v. State, 52 S.W.3d 242 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2001, no pet.) . . . 131, '134 Orrick v. State, 36 S.W.3d 622 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2000, no pet.) . . . . . . 48 Ottov. State,2008WL 313942 (Tex.Crim.App.2008, reh. denied) ....... 122 Owen v. State, 905 S.W.2d 434, 437-39 (Tex.App.-Waco 1 995, pet. ref d) . . . . . 78, 84, 117 O'Connellv. State, 17 S.W.3d 746 (Tex.App.-Austin 2000, no pet.) . . . . . . 58 O'Keefev.State,981 S.W.2d872(Tex.App.-Houston[1$Dist]1998,nopet.).. ........ 70 O'Nealv. State,999S.W.2d826(Tex.App.-Tyler1999, nopet.) . ....... 84 Paqe v. State, 125 S.W. 3d 640 (Tex.App.-Houston [1$ Dist] 2003, pet. refd) . . . . 46 Parks v. State, 666 S.W.2d 597 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1984, no pet.) . . . . . 68 Patef v. State, 2009 WL 1425219 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2009, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) . . . . . . . . 96 Pattonv. State,2011WL541481(Tex.App.-SanAntonio2011). ........ 57 Peckv. State,753 S.W.2d 811 (Tex.App.-Austin 1988, pet. refd) . . . . . . 130 Peddcordv.State,942S.W.2d 100(Tex.App.-Amarillo 1997, nopet.).. ........ 38 Pedenv.State,2004WL2538274(Tex.App.-Houston[1 Dist.]2004,pdrrefd) . ....... 88 Penlevv.State, 2S.W.3d534(Tex.App.-Texarkana1999,pet. refd) ...r... ........ 96 Perez v. State, 124 S.W.3d 214 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2002, no pet.) . . . . 134 Perkins v. State, 19 S.W.3d 854 (Tex.App.- Waco, April 19, 2000, pet. denied) . . 161 Perrv v. State, 991 S.W.2d 50 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1998, pet. refd) . . . . . 64 Pesina v. State, 676 S.W.2d 122 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) . . . . . 93 Pbters v. <strong>Texas</strong> Department of Public Safetu, 2005 WL 3007783 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2005, no pet.)(Not designated for publication) .. 152 Phiferv. State,787 S.W.2d 395 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990) . ...... 129 Phillips v. State, 964 S.W.2d 735 (Tex.App.-Waco 1998, pet. granted in part) 992 S.W.2d 491 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999) 4 S.W.3d 122 (Tex.App.-Waco 1999) . . . . 133 Phonq Xuan Dao v. State, 337 S.W.3d 927 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, pet. refd) . . . . . . 63 Pipkin v. State, 114 S.W.3d 649 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2003, no pet.) . . . . 11 Pfatero v. 9tate, 1995 WL 144565 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1995) pdr refd (Not designated for publication) Platten v. State, 2004 WL 100399 (Tex.App.-Tyler 2004, pdr refd) (Not designated for publication) . . . . 108 Pfessinser v. State; 536 S.W.2d 380 {Tex.Crim.App. 1976) . . . 129 Plouff v. State, 192 S.W.3d 213, (Tex.App.-Houston [14h Dist.]2006, no pet.) . . . . . . 59,61 Pointer v. State, 2011 WL 2163721 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2011) . . . . . . . . 36, 159 1_80
Poncev. State,828 S.W.2d 50 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, pet. ref'd) . .... 67 Pope v. State, 207 S.W.3d 352 (Tex.Crim.App. Nov. 15, 2006) . . . . 126 Popev.State,802S.W.2d418(Tex.App.-Austin 1991, nopet.).. ...... 156 Porterv. State,969 S.W.2d 60 (Tex.App.-Austin 1998, pet. refd) . . .. .. . 36 Pospisilv. State,2008WL 4443092 (Tex.App.-Texarkana2008, no pet.) . ...... 12 Poulosv.State,799S.W.2d769(Tex.App.-Houston [1stDist.] 1990, nopet.).. ........ 45 Prafte v. State, 2008 WL 5423193 (Tex.App.-Austin 2008, no pet.) . . . . 2, 50 Preston v. State, 983 S.W.2d 24 (Tex.App. -Tyler 1 998, no pet.) . . . . . 20 Pricev. State,2006WL 1707955 (Tex.App.-Austin 2006, pet. denied)(Notdesignated forpublication) ........ 57 Price v. State, 59 S.W.3d 297 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. refd) . . . 84,117,126 Purvisv.State,4S.W.3d118(Tex.App.-Waco1999,petrefd) . ....... 154 Quellettev. State,201'1WL4809822 (Tex.Crim.App.2011) ...... 124 Quinnev v. State, 99 S.W.3d 853 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, no pet.) . . . . . . 56, 59 Quinones v. State, 592 S.W.2d 933 (Tex.Crim.App. 1980), cert. denied, 101 S. Ct. 256. (1980) . . . 44 Rafaelfi v. State, 881 S.W.2d 714 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1994, pet. refd) . . . . . 15,41 Raqan v. State, 642 S.W.2d 489 (Tex.Crim.App. 1982) . . . . . 55 Railsbackv. State,95S.W.3d473(Tex.App.-Houston [1$ Dist] 2002,pet. refd.) . ...... 65 Ramos v. State, 124 S.W.3d 326 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2003, pet. ref d) . . . . . 91 , 92 Rawlinss v. State, 602 S.W.2d 268 (Tex.Crim.App. 1980) . ... '129 Rav v. State, 749 S.W.2d 939 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1988, pet. refd) . . '1,114,117 Rav v. State, 816 S.W.2d 97 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1991, no pet.) . . . . 156 Read v. State, 955 S.W.2d 435 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1997, pet. refd) . . . 137 Reaqanv. State,968S.W.2d 571 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1998, pet. refd).. ...... 65 Reardonv.State,695S.W.2d331 (Tex.App.-Houston[1stDist.] 1985, nopet.) . ...... 117 Reavis v. State, 84 S.W.3d 716 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth, 2002, no pet.) . . . . 46 Reddie v. State, 736 S.W.2d 923 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1987, pet. refd.) . . . . . 158 Redfearn v. State, 26 S.W.3d 729 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2000, no pet.) . . 140 Reed v. State, 308 S.W.3d 417 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2010) . . . . . . 34 Reed v. State, 916 S.W.2d 591 (Tex.App.-Amarillo, 1996, pet. refd) . . . . . . 1 Rehav.State,99S.W.3d373(Tex.App.-CorpusChristi2003,nopet.) ...... ... 28 181-
Page 1 and 2:
Driving While Intoxicated Case Law
Page 3 and 4:
2. DOESN'T APPLY 18 F. OFFICER'S AR
Page 5 and 6:
K, L. M. N. o. P. o. R. NOSOUND=NOP
Page 7 and 8:
F. G. H, L J. K. L. 3. NO RIGHT TO
Page 9 and 10:
C. D. STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR DR
Page 11 and 12:
E, F. G. H. t. J. K. L. M. N. o. P.
Page 13 and 14:
O. IF YOU ALLEGE MORE PRIOR DWI'S T
Page 15 and 16:
I. INFORMATION/CHARGING INSTRUMENT
Page 17 and 18:
B. IMPROPER QUESTION/STATEMENT Hark
Page 19 and 20:
DWI ROADBLOCKS A. ARE ILLEGAL Holt
Page 21 and 22:
V. OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE CHART The f
Page 23 and 24:
Elisibilitv for Occupational Driver
Page 25 and 26:
Villarealv. State, 2008 WL 4367616
Page 27 and 28:
out that hearsay is generally admis
Page 29 and 30:
Foster v. State, 326 S.W.3d 609 (Te
Page 31 and 32:
anyone other than officer to help h
Page 33 and 34:
F. OFFICER'S ARREST AUTHORITY WHEN
Page 35 and 36:
occur) who observed the traffic off
Page 37 and 38:
a mile in the early morning hours.
Page 39 and 40:
State v. Arriaqa, 5 S.W.3d 804 (Tex
Page 41 and 42:
explain the margin of error or the
Page 43 and 44:
P. "FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY''- SUFFIC
Page 45 and 46:
defendant from leaving. Officer sai
Page 47 and 48:
2. REASONABLE Bohren v. State,2011W
Page 49 and 50:
Sinqleton v. State. 91 S.W.3d 342 (
Page 51 and 52:
B. BASED ON'BREACH OF PEACE'THEORY
Page 53 and 54:
IX. VIDEO A. PARTS OF PREDICATE CAN
Page 55 and 56:
Mathieu v. State, 992 S.W.2d725 (Te
Page 57 and 58:
F. ABSENCE OF VIDEOTAPE 1. NOT GROU
Page 59 and 60:
K. NO SOUND = NO PROBLEM Aouirre v.
Page 61 and 62:
R. OFFICER'S NARRATIVE ON PERFORMAN
Page 63 and 64:
was effor, albeit harmless, to allo
Page 65 and 66:
forfeited in the guilt-innocence ph
Page 67 and 68:
ecoming the focus of a DWI investig
Page 69 and 70:
Rasan v. State,642S.W.2d 489 (Tex.C
Page 71 and 72:
2. OFFICER DOES NOT HAVE TO BE AN O
Page 73 and 74:
the reliability of VGN before it is
Page 75 and 76:
C. WALK AND TURN = LAY WITNESS TEST
Page 77 and 78:
G. FAILURE TO EXPLAIN FST'S IN DEFE
Page 79 and 80:
B. PROOF OF "STATE'' Barton v. Stat
Page 81 and 82:
C. INSTRUMENT CERTIFICATION 1, NEW
Page 83 and 84:
G. DIC.23 & DIC.24 WARNINGS 1. REQU
Page 85 and 86:
warning on refusing alcoholfesfs, b
Page 87 and 88:
efusing or of giving a sample for s
Page 89 and 90:
2. NO EVIDENCE THAT ADDITIONAL WARN
Page 91 and 92:
Hall v. State, 649 S.W.2d 627 (Tex.
Page 93 and 94:
3. AFTER 2 HOURS Holloway v. State,
Page 95 and 96:
P. BREATH TEST ADMISSIBLE AS PROOF
Page 97 and 98:
T. LOSS OF NORMAL & PER SE LAW EVID
Page 99 and 100:
fesf resu/fs were not inflammatory
Page 101 and 102:
6. IMPROPER ADMISSION OF EXTRAPOLAT
Page 103 and 104:
esu/fs. As long as fhe operator kno
Page 105 and 106:
suggesf that he was physically or m
Page 107 and 108:
D. PROCEDURE FOR TAKING BLOOD SAMPL
Page 109 and 110:
Thurman v. State, 861 S.W.2d 96 (Te
Page 111 and 112:
4. NOT NECESSARY TO SHOW WHO DREW T
Page 113 and 114:
Biqon v. State, 252 S.W.3d 360 (Tex
Page 115 and 116:
offense of DWI," the Court finds th
Page 117 and 118:
8. SEARCH WARRANT AFFIDAVIT CONTAIN
Page 119 and 120:
(b) FArAL Farhart v. State, 337 S.W
Page 121 and 122:
consenfs, 724.012 does not apply. H
Page 123 and 124:
in the Sfafe's case-in-chief, the S
Page 125 and 126:
was not the result of an involuntar
Page 127 and 128:
trance-like high. The Court affirme
Page 129 and 130:
C. CHARGE ON WORKING CONDITION OF I
Page 131 and 132:
intoxication sefs forfh alternative
Page 133 and 134:
of Appeals had misconstrued the act
Page 135 and 136:
the impairment element of the Sfafe
Page 137 and 138:
Sledqe v. State ,1994 WL 247961 (Te
Page 139 and 140:
V. WHEN CHARGE SPECIFICALLY USES SU
Page 141 and 142:
Tennerv v. State, 680 S.W.2d 629 (T
Page 143 and 144: E. ENHANCEMENT OF FELONY DWI WITH N
Page 145 and 146: Also, if stipulated that there are
Page 147 and 148: of the priors. He then complained o
Page 149 and 150: K. PROPER TO ALLEGE DATE PROBATION
Page 151 and 152: o. IF YOU ALLEGE MORE PRIOR DWI'S T
Page 153 and 154: a violation of the ex posf facto la
Page 155 and 156: W. EXPUNCTION WILL NOT ALWAYS RENDE
Page 157 and 158: intoxicated (DWI) from a C/ass B mi
Page 159 and 160: Holmberq v. State, 931 S.W.2d 3(Tex
Page 161 and 162: G. NO CONFLICT BETWEEN N'DUI'' AND
Page 163 and 164: equipment was obserued in the vehic
Page 165 and 166: unning, radio playing loudly, and d
Page 167 and 168: wheels was consr.stent with the whe
Page 169 and 170: Wriqht v. State, 932 S.W.2d 572 (Te
Page 171 and 172: Bucek v. State ,724 S.W .2d 129 (Te
Page 173 and 174: concerning how recently the vehicle
Page 175 and 176: B. DENIAL OF PROBATION DUE TO LANGU
Page 177 and 178: alcohol by calling a sysfem adminis
Page 179 and 180: Avfor v. State, 2011 WL 1659887 (Te
Page 181 and 182: Carrasco v. State,712S.W.2d 120 (Te
Page 183 and 184: Drapkin v. State, 781 S.W.2d 710 (T
Page 185 and 186: Folev v. State, 327 S.W.3d 907 (Tex
Page 187 and 188: (Tex.Crim.App. 1988)..... .......42
Page 189 and 190: Human v. State, 749 S.W.2d 832 {Tex
Page 191 and 192: Lewisv.State,72S.W.3d704(Tex.App.-F
Page 193: Moncivais v. State, 2O02WL 1445200
Page 197 and 198: Schaum v. State, 833 S.W.2d 644 (Te
Page 199 and 200: State v. Gerstenkom, 239 S.W.3d 357
Page 201 and 202: Stone v. State, 685 S.W.2d 791 (Tex
Page 203 and 204: Vasquezv. State,2007WL 2417373 (Tex
show all

Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?