03.04.2013 Views

Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

F.<br />

G.<br />

H,<br />

L<br />

J.<br />

K.<br />

L.<br />

3. NO RIGHT TO COUNSEL PRIOR TO DECIDING WHETHER<br />

TO GIVE. SAMPLE<br />

68<br />

BREATH AMPULES NEED NOT BE PRESERVED . . .<br />

DIC-23 & DIC-24 WARNINGS<br />

68<br />

69<br />

1. REQUIREMENT THEY BE GIVEN IN WRITING RELATES ONLY<br />

TO ADMISSIBILITY OF REFUSALS<br />

69<br />

2. FAILURE TO GIVE WARNINGS IN WRITING NOT<br />

NECESSARILY FATAL<br />

69<br />

3. WRITTEN WARNINGS NEED NOT BE PROVIDED PRIOR<br />

4.<br />

TO REFUSAL ....<br />

THAT ARREST PRECEDE READING OF DIC-24 = FLEXIBLE<br />

70<br />

70<br />

5. DIC-24 NOTICE IN WRITING REQUIREMENT SATISFIED BY<br />

MAKING WRITTEN COPY "AVAILABLE<br />

70<br />

6. OFFICER WHO READS DIC-24 & REQUESTS SAMPLE NEED<br />

NOT BE ARRESTING OFFICER<br />

70<br />

7. CIVILIAN READING WARNINGS NOT NECESSARILY BASIS FOR<br />

8.<br />

EXCLUSION<br />

DIC-24 - WORDING .10 OR GREATER - IS CORRECT - THOUGH<br />

IT'S NOT TIED TO DRIVING<br />

70<br />

71<br />

9.<br />

10.<br />

ERROR IN SPANISH LANGUAGE VERSION OF THE<br />

WARNING DID NOT MAKE DEFENDANT'S CONSENT INVALID<br />

COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE WARNINGS<br />

71<br />

71<br />

(a) NEED To BE GIVEN<br />

71<br />

11.<br />

(b) DON'T NEED TO BE G|VEN<br />

DIC 23 & DIC 24 DOCUMENTS ARE NOT HEARSAY<br />

72<br />

72<br />

12.<br />

13.<br />

FAILURE TO READ'UNDER 21" PORTION OF DIC 24<br />

NOT PRECLUDE ADMISSION OF BT<br />

URINE SAMPLE<br />

72<br />

73<br />

(a) MAYBE REQUESTED. . . .<br />

73<br />

(b) rs ADMTSSTBLE wrTHour EXPLAINING RIGHT TO REFUSE 73<br />

NOT NECESSARY TO SHOW 210 LITERS OF BREATH<br />

BREATH TEST NOT COERCED .<br />

73<br />

73<br />

1. EXTMWARNING REFERRED TO CONSEQUENCES OF<br />

PASSING NOT REFUSING .<br />

73<br />

2. NO EVIDENCE THAT ADDITIONAL WARNING ACTUALLY<br />

COERCED DEFENDANT ..........<br />

75<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

NO EVIDENCE THAT DEFENDANT RELIED UPON EXTRA WARNING . . . .<br />

DEFENDANT GAVE SAMPLE, CONSEQUENCES UNDERSTATED . . . . . . .<br />

75<br />

75<br />

5. AT MTS IT IS THE DEFENDANT'S BURDEN TO SHOW CONSENT<br />

TO GIVE BT WAS NOT VOLUNTARY<br />

6. INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE OF CAUSAL CONNECTION BETWEEN<br />

OFFICER STATEMENT AND CONSENT<br />

BREATH TEST FOUND TO BE COERCED<br />

BREATH TEST REFUSAL EVIDENCE<br />

L AS EVIDENCE OF GUILT<br />

2. NO VIOLATION OF sTH AMENDMENT<br />

75<br />

76<br />

76<br />

77<br />

77<br />

77<br />

3. REASON FOR REFUSAL AND CONDITION OF INSTRUMENT<br />

IRRELEVANT ....<br />

4. REFUSAL BASED ON INTOXICATION IS STILL A "REFUSAL" . . . .<br />

5. INTOXICATION MAY BE PRESUMED FROM BTR . .<br />

6. FAILURE TO FOLLOW BREATH TEST INSTRUCTIONS = REFUSAL . . . . .<br />

LATE BREATH TEST - CAN BE SUFFICIENT .<br />

1. LATE TEST NOT CONCLUSIVE BUT IS PROBATIVE<br />

AFTER 1 HOUR & 20 MINUTES<br />

77<br />

78<br />

78<br />

78<br />

78<br />

78<br />

78<br />

VA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!