Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Cunninqham v. State, 966 S.W.2d 811 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1998, no pet.) . . . . . 17 Curlv. State, 1994 WL 33757096 fl-ex.App.-Corpus Christi 1999, no pet.) . . . . . . 75 Curtin v. State, 2006 WL 347025 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2006, no pet.) . . . . . . 112 Curtis v. State, 209 S.W.3d 688, (Tex.App.-Texarkana, 2006, pdr granted). Reversed: Curtis v. State, No. PD-1 820-06, 2007 WL317541(Tex.Crim.App.2007). Conviction affirmed Curtis v. State. No.06-05-00125-CR,2008 WL 707285 (Tex.App.-Texarkana,2008). .....23 Daricekv. State,875 S.W.2d 770 {Tex.App.-Austin 1994, pet. ref'd) . ...... 83 Davidson v. State, 2010 WL 118776 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2010, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) . . . 51 Davis v. State, 2006 WL 2194708, (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, no pet.). (Not designated for publication) . 3 Davis v. State, 949 S.W.2d 28 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.) . . . . 114 Davis v. State, 964 S.W.2d 352 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1998, no pet.) . . . . 118 Dawv. State,67 S.W.3d 382 (Tex.App.-Waco,2001, no pet.).. ....... 120 Dawkins v. State. 822 S.W. 2d 668, 671 (Tex.App.-Waco, 1991, pet. refd) . . . . . . 40, 41,62 -ry.P-]ll.l.*.i1::'111"-i::-.T:']::'t]:i?::1:::l:1:']:1l:*i1:::'11 Deleon v. State, 2006 WL 1063765 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2006, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) . . . . 49 Denton v. State, 911 S.W.2d 388 (Tex.Crim.App.1995) . . . . 155 Deramusv. State,2011WL582667 (Tex.App.-FortWorth 2011) . ....... 27 DerichsweilerV. State,2011WL2552gg(Tex.Crim.App.2011),s.ct. cert.denied, Oct. 3,2011 . 19,15 Desilets v. State, 2010 WL 3910588 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2010, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) . . 98, 119 Dickerson v. State,965 S.W.2d 30 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist] Feb. 19, 1998),986 S.W.2d 618 (Tex.Crim.App.1999) ......95 Doqav v. State, 101 S.W.3d 614 (Tex.App.-Houston [1$ Dist.] 2003, no pet.) . . . . : 20 Doneburq v. State, 44 S.W.3d 651 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pdr refd.) . . . . . . '134 Dombusch v. State, 262 S.W.3d 432 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2008, no pet.) . . . . . . 150 Dorsche v. State, 514 S.W.2d 755 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974) . . . 79 Dotv v. State, 2005 WL 1240697 (Tex.App.-Austin May 26, 2005)(mem.op., Not designated for publicaiton), pet. dism'd, improvidently granted, No. PD-1 1 59-05, 2007 WL 841 1 12 (Tex.Crim.App.2007)(Not designated for publication) . . 91 , '141 Douthiftv.State, 127S.W.3d327(Tex.App.-Austin2004,nopet.).. ........... 79 Dowlerv. State,44 S.W.3d 666 (Tex.App.-Austin 2001, pet. refd.) . . . . . . 15 Dovle v. State, 2008 WL 597450 (Tex.App.-Houston [1 Dist.], 2008 pdr refd) . . . 122 168 27
Drapkin v. State, 781 S.W.2d 710 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1989, pet. refd) . . . . 67, 114 Drichas v. State, 175 S.W.3d 795 (Tex.Crim.App.2005) on remand 187 S.W.3d 161 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2006) pdr granted, judgment vacated by 210 S.W.3d 644 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006) on remand to 219 S.W.3d 471 (Tex.App.-Texarkana200Tpet.refd) . ...118 Dumasv. State,812 S.W.2d 611 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1991, pet. ref'd) . .... 40,49 Dunkelberq v. State, 276 S.W.3d 503 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth, 2008, pet. refd) . . . . 23 Durhanv.State,710S.W.2d 176(Tex.App.-Beaumont1986,nopet.).. ........ 44 Dunett v. State, 36 S.W.3d 205 (Tex.App.-Houston (14th Dist.) 2001 , no pet.) . . . . . . . . . . 97 Dvar v. State,125 S.W.3d 460 (Tex.Crim.App., April 24,2003). . . . . . 37 Dve v. State, 2003 WL 361289 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2003, no pet.)(Not designated for publication) . . . . . . 100 Ehrhartv.State,9S'W.3d929(Tex.App'-Beaumont2000,reh.overru|ed) Elliotv. State,908S.W.2d590(Tex.App.-Austin 1995, pet. refd) . ...... 38 Ellisv. State,86 S.W.3d 759(Tex.App.-Waco 2002,pe1. refd) . ........ 57 Ellisv.State,99S.W.3d783(Tex.App.-Houston[1 Dist.]2003, petrefd. . ...... Emerson v. State, 880 S.W.2d 759 (Tex.Crim.App. 1994) . . . . . . 56, 57 Emiqh v. State, 916 S.W.2d 71 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist] 1996, no pet.) . . : . . 125 Enqlund v. State, 907 S.W.2d 937 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist] 1995) affirmed 946 S.W.2d 64 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997) 128 Enriquezv. State, 56 S.W.3d 596 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi, August 9,2001) reh ovenuled (October4,2001,) pet. refd) 106 Erdman v. State,861 S.W.2d 890 (Tex.Crim.App. 1993) Erickson v. State, 13 S.W.3d 850 (Tex.App.-Austin 2000, pet. refd) . Evans v. State, 2006 WL 1594000 (Tex.App.Houston [14h Dist.] 2006, pdr refd) Evans v. State, 690 S.W.2d 112 (Tex.App.-El Paso 't985, pet. refd) Ewerokeh v. State, 835 S.W.2d 796 (Tex.App.-Austin 1992, pet. refd) Ex Parte Anthonv, 931 S.W.2d 664 (Tex.App.-Dallas, 1996 pet. refd) . . . 143 Ex Parte Crenshaw, 25 S.W.3d 761 (Tex.App.-Houston [1$ Dist.] 2000, pet. refd) . . . . . 147 ExParte Dunlap,963S.W.2d 954(Tex.App.-FortWorth 1998, nopet.) ..1.... .. 144 ExParteEfizabethAvers,g2l S.W.2d438(Tex.App.-Houston[lstDist] 1996, nopet.) . ...... 144 Ex Parte Elliot, 950 S.W.2d 714 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1997, pet. refd) . . ]62 ExParteJamail,904S.W.2d 862 (Tex.App.-Houston [lstDist] 1995, pet. refd) . ....... 41 Ex Parte Leverett, 2006 WL 279388 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2006, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) . . 161 Ex Parte McFall, 939 S.W.2d 799 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1997, no pet.) . . 145 L69 '13 76 124 47 109 7E
Page 1 and 2:
Driving While Intoxicated Case Law
Page 3 and 4:
2. DOESN'T APPLY 18 F. OFFICER'S AR
Page 5 and 6:
K, L. M. N. o. P. o. R. NOSOUND=NOP
Page 7 and 8:
F. G. H, L J. K. L. 3. NO RIGHT TO
Page 9 and 10:
C. D. STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR DR
Page 11 and 12:
E, F. G. H. t. J. K. L. M. N. o. P.
Page 13 and 14:
O. IF YOU ALLEGE MORE PRIOR DWI'S T
Page 15 and 16:
I. INFORMATION/CHARGING INSTRUMENT
Page 17 and 18:
B. IMPROPER QUESTION/STATEMENT Hark
Page 19 and 20:
DWI ROADBLOCKS A. ARE ILLEGAL Holt
Page 21 and 22:
V. OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE CHART The f
Page 23 and 24:
Elisibilitv for Occupational Driver
Page 25 and 26:
Villarealv. State, 2008 WL 4367616
Page 27 and 28:
out that hearsay is generally admis
Page 29 and 30:
Foster v. State, 326 S.W.3d 609 (Te
Page 31 and 32:
anyone other than officer to help h
Page 33 and 34:
F. OFFICER'S ARREST AUTHORITY WHEN
Page 35 and 36:
occur) who observed the traffic off
Page 37 and 38:
a mile in the early morning hours.
Page 39 and 40:
State v. Arriaqa, 5 S.W.3d 804 (Tex
Page 41 and 42:
explain the margin of error or the
Page 43 and 44:
P. "FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY''- SUFFIC
Page 45 and 46:
defendant from leaving. Officer sai
Page 47 and 48:
2. REASONABLE Bohren v. State,2011W
Page 49 and 50:
Sinqleton v. State. 91 S.W.3d 342 (
Page 51 and 52:
B. BASED ON'BREACH OF PEACE'THEORY
Page 53 and 54:
IX. VIDEO A. PARTS OF PREDICATE CAN
Page 55 and 56:
Mathieu v. State, 992 S.W.2d725 (Te
Page 57 and 58:
F. ABSENCE OF VIDEOTAPE 1. NOT GROU
Page 59 and 60:
K. NO SOUND = NO PROBLEM Aouirre v.
Page 61 and 62:
R. OFFICER'S NARRATIVE ON PERFORMAN
Page 63 and 64:
was effor, albeit harmless, to allo
Page 65 and 66:
forfeited in the guilt-innocence ph
Page 67 and 68:
ecoming the focus of a DWI investig
Page 69 and 70:
Rasan v. State,642S.W.2d 489 (Tex.C
Page 71 and 72:
2. OFFICER DOES NOT HAVE TO BE AN O
Page 73 and 74:
the reliability of VGN before it is
Page 75 and 76:
C. WALK AND TURN = LAY WITNESS TEST
Page 77 and 78:
G. FAILURE TO EXPLAIN FST'S IN DEFE
Page 79 and 80:
B. PROOF OF "STATE'' Barton v. Stat
Page 81 and 82:
C. INSTRUMENT CERTIFICATION 1, NEW
Page 83 and 84:
G. DIC.23 & DIC.24 WARNINGS 1. REQU
Page 85 and 86:
warning on refusing alcoholfesfs, b
Page 87 and 88:
efusing or of giving a sample for s
Page 89 and 90:
2. NO EVIDENCE THAT ADDITIONAL WARN
Page 91 and 92:
Hall v. State, 649 S.W.2d 627 (Tex.
Page 93 and 94:
3. AFTER 2 HOURS Holloway v. State,
Page 95 and 96:
P. BREATH TEST ADMISSIBLE AS PROOF
Page 97 and 98:
T. LOSS OF NORMAL & PER SE LAW EVID
Page 99 and 100:
fesf resu/fs were not inflammatory
Page 101 and 102:
6. IMPROPER ADMISSION OF EXTRAPOLAT
Page 103 and 104:
esu/fs. As long as fhe operator kno
Page 105 and 106:
suggesf that he was physically or m
Page 107 and 108:
D. PROCEDURE FOR TAKING BLOOD SAMPL
Page 109 and 110:
Thurman v. State, 861 S.W.2d 96 (Te
Page 111 and 112:
4. NOT NECESSARY TO SHOW WHO DREW T
Page 113 and 114:
Biqon v. State, 252 S.W.3d 360 (Tex
Page 115 and 116:
offense of DWI," the Court finds th
Page 117 and 118:
8. SEARCH WARRANT AFFIDAVIT CONTAIN
Page 119 and 120:
(b) FArAL Farhart v. State, 337 S.W
Page 121 and 122:
consenfs, 724.012 does not apply. H
Page 123 and 124:
in the Sfafe's case-in-chief, the S
Page 125 and 126:
was not the result of an involuntar
Page 127 and 128:
trance-like high. The Court affirme
Page 129 and 130:
C. CHARGE ON WORKING CONDITION OF I
Page 131 and 132: intoxication sefs forfh alternative
Page 133 and 134: of Appeals had misconstrued the act
Page 135 and 136: the impairment element of the Sfafe
Page 137 and 138: Sledqe v. State ,1994 WL 247961 (Te
Page 139 and 140: V. WHEN CHARGE SPECIFICALLY USES SU
Page 141 and 142: Tennerv v. State, 680 S.W.2d 629 (T
Page 143 and 144: E. ENHANCEMENT OF FELONY DWI WITH N
Page 145 and 146: Also, if stipulated that there are
Page 147 and 148: of the priors. He then complained o
Page 149 and 150: K. PROPER TO ALLEGE DATE PROBATION
Page 151 and 152: o. IF YOU ALLEGE MORE PRIOR DWI'S T
Page 153 and 154: a violation of the ex posf facto la
Page 155 and 156: W. EXPUNCTION WILL NOT ALWAYS RENDE
Page 157 and 158: intoxicated (DWI) from a C/ass B mi
Page 159 and 160: Holmberq v. State, 931 S.W.2d 3(Tex
Page 161 and 162: G. NO CONFLICT BETWEEN N'DUI'' AND
Page 163 and 164: equipment was obserued in the vehic
Page 165 and 166: unning, radio playing loudly, and d
Page 167 and 168: wheels was consr.stent with the whe
Page 169 and 170: Wriqht v. State, 932 S.W.2d 572 (Te
Page 171 and 172: Bucek v. State ,724 S.W .2d 129 (Te
Page 173 and 174: concerning how recently the vehicle
Page 175 and 176: B. DENIAL OF PROBATION DUE TO LANGU
Page 177 and 178: alcohol by calling a sysfem adminis
Page 179 and 180: Avfor v. State, 2011 WL 1659887 (Te
Page 181: Carrasco v. State,712S.W.2d 120 (Te
Page 185 and 186: Folev v. State, 327 S.W.3d 907 (Tex
Page 187 and 188: (Tex.Crim.App. 1988)..... .......42
Page 189 and 190: Human v. State, 749 S.W.2d 832 {Tex
Page 191 and 192: Lewisv.State,72S.W.3d704(Tex.App.-F
Page 193 and 194: Moncivais v. State, 2O02WL 1445200
Page 195 and 196: Poncev. State,828 S.W.2d 50 (Tex.Ap
Page 197 and 198: Schaum v. State, 833 S.W.2d 644 (Te
Page 199 and 200: State v. Gerstenkom, 239 S.W.3d 357
Page 201 and 202: Stone v. State, 685 S.W.2d 791 (Tex
Page 203 and 204: Vasquezv. State,2007WL 2417373 (Tex
show all

Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?