Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Biederman v. State,724 S.W .2d 436 (Tex.App.-Eastland 1987, pet. refd) . . . . . . 137 Biqon v. State, 252 S.W.3d 360 (Tex.Crim.App.2008) . . 99,142 Biomson v. State,1996 WL 627374 (Tex.App.-Austin 1996, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) . . . 110 Bfackwellv. State, 2005 WL 548245, (Tex.App.-Austin 2005, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) . . . . . . 94,97 Blessinq v. State,927 S.W.2d 266 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1996, no pet.) . . . . 126 Block v. State, 1997 WL 530767 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, pet.refd) (Not designated for publication) . 72 Blok v. State, 986 S.W.2d 389 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. refd) . . . 117 Bf umenstetter v. State, 135 S.W.3d 234 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2004, no pet.) . . . . 92 Bluntv. State,724s.W.2d 79 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987) . ...... 95 Boes v. State,2004WL 1685244 (Tex.App.-Austin 2004) . . . . . . 119 Bohrenv.State,20'11WL3274039 (Tex.App.-ElPaso2011).... ....... 33 Booherv. State,668 S.W.2d 882 (Tex.App.-Houston [lst Dist] 1984, pet. ref'd) . ....... 116 Bookmanv.State,200SWL 3112713 (Tex.App.-Waco,2008, reh.overruled)..... ..... 73 Boss v. State, 778 S.W.2d 594 (Tex.App.-Austin 1989, no pet.) . . . . . . . . . 81 Bower v. State, 77 S.W.3d 514 (Tex.App.-Houston [1"t Dist.] 2002, pet refd) . . . . 138 Bovlev.State,778S.W.2d113(Tex.App.-Houston[14thDist.]1989,nopet.).. ....... 156 Bradford v. State,230 S.W.3d 719(Tex.App.-Houston [14h Dist.]2007,no pet.) .. ..... 116 Broadnax v. State, 995 S.W.2d 900 (Tex.App.-Austin 1999, no pet.) . . . . . 90 Brotherv. SFte, 166 S.W.3d 255 (Tex.Crim.App.2005), cert. denied,546 U.S. 1150 (2006) .. 11,20 Brown v. State, 716 S.W.2d 939 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986).[reversed on other grounds] . . . . . 128 Brown v. State. 290 S.W.3d 247 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2009, reh. denied, pdr refd) . . . . '111 Brvant v. State, 187 S.W.3d 397 (Tex.Crim.App.2005) . . . . 132 Bucek v. State,724 S.W.2d 129 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1987, no pet.) . . . . . 149,157 Burhalterv. State,642 S.W.2d 231 (Tex.Crim.App. 1982) ... 92 Burke v. State, 6 S.W.2d 312 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1999) vacated and remandedby 28 S.W.3d 545 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000)opinionwithdrawn and substituteopinion submifted 80 S.W.3d 82 (Tex.App.-FortWorth 2A04 ........ 147 Burke v. State, 93O S.W.2d 230 {Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, pet. ref'd) . ...... 2,41 Burkett v. State, 179 S.W.3d 18 (Tex.App. San Antonio 2005, reh. ovenuled) . . . . 12O Burkhartv. State,2003W121999896(Tex.App.-Dallas, 2003, no pet.)(Notdesignated forpublication) ....... 57 Bums v. State,8O7 S.W.2d 878 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1991, pet. refd) . . . 93,96 Campbelf v. State,325s.W.3d 222(fex.App.-FortWorth,2OlO) . ...... 55 L66
Carrasco v. State,712S.W.2d 120 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986) . . . 36 Canollv. State, 51 S.W.3d 797 (Tex.App.-Houston [1$ Dist.] 2001, pet. refd) . .. 134 *T-#'????Y:":i:iJl::1lt_:::::::l'i::::'ii:ll'll':::i?l"lTr:i':l':: Castillo v. Stqte, 913 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Crim.App.1995) . . . . . 3 Castilfo v. State, 939 S.W.2d 754 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist] 1997 pet. refd) . . . . 49,'125 Cavazos v. State, 969 S.W.2d 454 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1998, no pet.) .. ...... 94 Chaloupka v. State, 20 S.W.3d 172 (Tex.App.-Texarkana, April 18, 2000, pet refd) . . . . 153 Chamberlain v. State,294 S.W.2d 719 (Tex.Crim.App. 1956) . . . . . 158 Chauncev v. State, 837 S.W.2d 179 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1992), affd., 877 S.W.2d 305 (Tex.Crim.App. 1994) . . . 117 Chilman v. State, 22 S.W.3d 50 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist] 2000, pet. refd.) 17, 36, 38 Chunn v. State,923 S.W.2d 728 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1996, pet.ref'd] ... ........ 2 Churchv.State,942S.W.2d139(Tex.App.-Houston[1stDist.]1997,pet.refd). ...... 145 Claiborne v. State, 2005 WL 2100458 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth, 2005, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) . . . 152 Clark v. State,728 S.W.2d 484 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth, vacated and remanded on other grounds,753 S.W.2d 371 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), onremand 781 S.W.2d954(Tex.App.-FortWorth 1989, no pet.) ........ 39 Clark v. Qtate, 933 S.W.2d 332 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1996, no pet.) . . . . . . . . 94 cofe v. State, 611 S.W.2d 79 (Tex.Crim.App. 1981) . . . 129 Collinsv.State,829S.W.2d894(Tex.App.-Dallas1992,nopet.) . ....-. 22 Combestv. State,953 S.W.2d 453 (Tex.App.-Austin 1997). On remand 981 S.W.2d 958 (Tex.App.-Austin 19981. Same holdins .... . . . 92 Comptonv.State,120S.W.3d375(Tex.App.-Houston[1stDist.]2003,pet.refd) . ...... 60 Cook v. State, 2006 WL 1633250 (Tex.App.-Tyler 2006, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) . . . . . . 65 Cook v. State, 63 S.W.3d 924 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, pet. refd) . . . . 23 Cooperv.State,96l S.W.2d229(Tex.App.-Houston1"tDist.l1997,petrefd) ... ...... 37 Corbin v. State,8s S.W.3d 272,(Tex.Crim.App. 2002) . . . . . 18 Comus v. State, 931 S.W.2d 30 (Tex.App.-Austin 1996), pet. dism'd, 962 S.W.2d 590 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998) . . . 94 Crenshawv. State,2011 WL 3211258 (Tex.App.-FortWorth 2011, pd.rfiled).... ...... 125 Crider v. State ,2011 WL 5554806 (Tex.Crim.App.2011) . . 101 Criftendonv. State,899S.W.2d668(Tex.Crim.App.1995) ........ 21 Crockerv.State,260S.W.3d589(Tex.App.-Tyler2008, nopet.).. ..... 138 Cunninqham v. State,2004WL28A3220 (Tex.App.-San Antonio, 2004, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) t67
Page 1 and 2:
Driving While Intoxicated Case Law
Page 3 and 4:
2. DOESN'T APPLY 18 F. OFFICER'S AR
Page 5 and 6:
K, L. M. N. o. P. o. R. NOSOUND=NOP
Page 7 and 8:
F. G. H, L J. K. L. 3. NO RIGHT TO
Page 9 and 10:
C. D. STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR DR
Page 11 and 12:
E, F. G. H. t. J. K. L. M. N. o. P.
Page 13 and 14:
O. IF YOU ALLEGE MORE PRIOR DWI'S T
Page 15 and 16:
I. INFORMATION/CHARGING INSTRUMENT
Page 17 and 18:
B. IMPROPER QUESTION/STATEMENT Hark
Page 19 and 20:
DWI ROADBLOCKS A. ARE ILLEGAL Holt
Page 21 and 22:
V. OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE CHART The f
Page 23 and 24:
Elisibilitv for Occupational Driver
Page 25 and 26:
Villarealv. State, 2008 WL 4367616
Page 27 and 28:
out that hearsay is generally admis
Page 29 and 30:
Foster v. State, 326 S.W.3d 609 (Te
Page 31 and 32:
anyone other than officer to help h
Page 33 and 34:
F. OFFICER'S ARREST AUTHORITY WHEN
Page 35 and 36:
occur) who observed the traffic off
Page 37 and 38:
a mile in the early morning hours.
Page 39 and 40:
State v. Arriaqa, 5 S.W.3d 804 (Tex
Page 41 and 42:
explain the margin of error or the
Page 43 and 44:
P. "FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY''- SUFFIC
Page 45 and 46:
defendant from leaving. Officer sai
Page 47 and 48:
2. REASONABLE Bohren v. State,2011W
Page 49 and 50:
Sinqleton v. State. 91 S.W.3d 342 (
Page 51 and 52:
B. BASED ON'BREACH OF PEACE'THEORY
Page 53 and 54:
IX. VIDEO A. PARTS OF PREDICATE CAN
Page 55 and 56:
Mathieu v. State, 992 S.W.2d725 (Te
Page 57 and 58:
F. ABSENCE OF VIDEOTAPE 1. NOT GROU
Page 59 and 60:
K. NO SOUND = NO PROBLEM Aouirre v.
Page 61 and 62:
R. OFFICER'S NARRATIVE ON PERFORMAN
Page 63 and 64:
was effor, albeit harmless, to allo
Page 65 and 66:
forfeited in the guilt-innocence ph
Page 67 and 68:
ecoming the focus of a DWI investig
Page 69 and 70:
Rasan v. State,642S.W.2d 489 (Tex.C
Page 71 and 72:
2. OFFICER DOES NOT HAVE TO BE AN O
Page 73 and 74:
the reliability of VGN before it is
Page 75 and 76:
C. WALK AND TURN = LAY WITNESS TEST
Page 77 and 78:
G. FAILURE TO EXPLAIN FST'S IN DEFE
Page 79 and 80:
B. PROOF OF "STATE'' Barton v. Stat
Page 81 and 82:
C. INSTRUMENT CERTIFICATION 1, NEW
Page 83 and 84:
G. DIC.23 & DIC.24 WARNINGS 1. REQU
Page 85 and 86:
warning on refusing alcoholfesfs, b
Page 87 and 88:
efusing or of giving a sample for s
Page 89 and 90:
2. NO EVIDENCE THAT ADDITIONAL WARN
Page 91 and 92:
Hall v. State, 649 S.W.2d 627 (Tex.
Page 93 and 94:
3. AFTER 2 HOURS Holloway v. State,
Page 95 and 96:
P. BREATH TEST ADMISSIBLE AS PROOF
Page 97 and 98:
T. LOSS OF NORMAL & PER SE LAW EVID
Page 99 and 100:
fesf resu/fs were not inflammatory
Page 101 and 102:
6. IMPROPER ADMISSION OF EXTRAPOLAT
Page 103 and 104:
esu/fs. As long as fhe operator kno
Page 105 and 106:
suggesf that he was physically or m
Page 107 and 108:
D. PROCEDURE FOR TAKING BLOOD SAMPL
Page 109 and 110:
Thurman v. State, 861 S.W.2d 96 (Te
Page 111 and 112:
4. NOT NECESSARY TO SHOW WHO DREW T
Page 113 and 114:
Biqon v. State, 252 S.W.3d 360 (Tex
Page 115 and 116:
offense of DWI," the Court finds th
Page 117 and 118:
8. SEARCH WARRANT AFFIDAVIT CONTAIN
Page 119 and 120:
(b) FArAL Farhart v. State, 337 S.W
Page 121 and 122:
consenfs, 724.012 does not apply. H
Page 123 and 124:
in the Sfafe's case-in-chief, the S
Page 125 and 126:
was not the result of an involuntar
Page 127 and 128:
trance-like high. The Court affirme
Page 129 and 130: C. CHARGE ON WORKING CONDITION OF I
Page 131 and 132: intoxication sefs forfh alternative
Page 133 and 134: of Appeals had misconstrued the act
Page 135 and 136: the impairment element of the Sfafe
Page 137 and 138: Sledqe v. State ,1994 WL 247961 (Te
Page 139 and 140: V. WHEN CHARGE SPECIFICALLY USES SU
Page 141 and 142: Tennerv v. State, 680 S.W.2d 629 (T
Page 143 and 144: E. ENHANCEMENT OF FELONY DWI WITH N
Page 145 and 146: Also, if stipulated that there are
Page 147 and 148: of the priors. He then complained o
Page 149 and 150: K. PROPER TO ALLEGE DATE PROBATION
Page 151 and 152: o. IF YOU ALLEGE MORE PRIOR DWI'S T
Page 153 and 154: a violation of the ex posf facto la
Page 155 and 156: W. EXPUNCTION WILL NOT ALWAYS RENDE
Page 157 and 158: intoxicated (DWI) from a C/ass B mi
Page 159 and 160: Holmberq v. State, 931 S.W.2d 3(Tex
Page 161 and 162: G. NO CONFLICT BETWEEN N'DUI'' AND
Page 163 and 164: equipment was obserued in the vehic
Page 165 and 166: unning, radio playing loudly, and d
Page 167 and 168: wheels was consr.stent with the whe
Page 169 and 170: Wriqht v. State, 932 S.W.2d 572 (Te
Page 171 and 172: Bucek v. State ,724 S.W .2d 129 (Te
Page 173 and 174: concerning how recently the vehicle
Page 175 and 176: B. DENIAL OF PROBATION DUE TO LANGU
Page 177 and 178: alcohol by calling a sysfem adminis
Page 179: Avfor v. State, 2011 WL 1659887 (Te
Page 183 and 184: Drapkin v. State, 781 S.W.2d 710 (T
Page 185 and 186: Folev v. State, 327 S.W.3d 907 (Tex
Page 187 and 188: (Tex.Crim.App. 1988)..... .......42
Page 189 and 190: Human v. State, 749 S.W.2d 832 {Tex
Page 191 and 192: Lewisv.State,72S.W.3d704(Tex.App.-F
Page 193 and 194: Moncivais v. State, 2O02WL 1445200
Page 195 and 196: Poncev. State,828 S.W.2d 50 (Tex.Ap
Page 197 and 198: Schaum v. State, 833 S.W.2d 644 (Te
Page 199 and 200: State v. Gerstenkom, 239 S.W.3d 357
Page 201 and 202: Stone v. State, 685 S.W.2d 791 (Tex
Page 203 and 204: Vasquezv. State,2007WL 2417373 (Tex
show all

Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?