Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Texas Departmentof PublicSafetvv. Mitchell,2003WL 1904035 (Tex.App.-FortWorth 2003, no pet.) .. ...... 72 TexasDepartmentOfPublicSafetvv.Moore,lTSS.W.3d2T0(Houston[1"tDist.]2OO4,nopet.).. .....109 TexasDepartmentOf PublicSafetvv. Nielsen. 102S.W.3d313(Tex.App.-Beaumont,2003, nopet.)......... 61 Texas Departmentof PublicSafetvv. Rolfe,986S.W.2d 823(Tex.App.-Austin 1999, no pet.) . ........ 75 Texas Department of Public Safetv v. Sanchez. 82 S.W.3d 506 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2002, no pet.) . . . . . . . . . 78 Texas Department of Public Safetv v. Struve, 79 S.W.3d 796 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi, 2002, pet. denied) . . . . . 72 Texas Departmentof PublicSafetvv. Thomas,985 S.W.2d 567 (Tex.App.-Waco 1998, no pet.). . ...... 71 TexasDepartmentof PublicSafetvv.Thompson,14S.W.3d853(TexlApp.-Beaumont2000, nopet.)......... 84 Texas Department of Public Safetv v. Walter, 979 S.W.2d 22 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.) . . . . . 70 Texas v. McCrary, 986 S.W.2d 259 {Tex.App.-Texarkana 1998, pet. ref'd} ...... ........ 22 Thibaut v. State, 782 S.W.2d 307 (Tex.App.-Eastland 1989, no pet.) . . . . . 63 Thomas v. State, 990 S.W.2d 858 {Tex.App.-Dallas 1999. no pet.} .. ....... 78 Thurman v. State,861 S.W.2d g6 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist] 1993 no pet.] . .... 95 Tietzv. State,256S.W.3d377(Tex.App.-SanAntonio2008, pet. refd). ....... 133 Toddv.State,956S.W.2d777 (Tex.App.-Waco 1997, pet. refd).. ..... 145 Torres v. State, 109 S.W.3d 602 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2003, no pet.) 93, 116 Torres v. State, 2000 WL 34251147 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2000, no pet. (Not designated for publication) . . . 110 Townsend v. State, 813 S.W.2d 181 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist] 1991, pet. refd) . . 16,42 Tracev v. State, 350 S.W.2d 563 (Tex.Crim.App. 1961) . . . . 64 Trahan v. State, 16 S.W.3d 146 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2000, no pet.) . . . . . 28 Troff v. State, 882 S.W.2d 905 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, pet. refd) . . . 134 ry* iiliT':::::1il:l1il-::i*:11'Y:'l:????:lll 'lllll):i1l:'::::1l'Ti"",t"ii Turnerv. State,877 S.W.2d 513 (Tex.App.-FortWorth 1994, no pet.) .. 65, 155 Turpin v. State, 606 S.W.2d 907 (Tex.Crim.App. 1980) . . . . . 68 Urquhart v. State, 128 S.W.3d 701 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2003, reh. overruled, pet. refd) . . . 74 Vafenti v. State, 49 S.W.3d 594 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, no pet.) . . . . 12g Valentich v. State, 2005 WL 1405801 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2005, no pet.) (Not designated for publication) . . . . . 19 Va||esv.State,817S'W'2d138(Tex.App.-E|Paso1991,nopet').. Vanderhorst v. State, 52 S.W.3d 237 (Tex.App.-Eastland 2001, no pet.) . . . . 12, 133 Varoasv.State,2Tl S.W.3d338(Tex.App.-SanAntonio2008, nopet.) . ...... 122 188
Vasquezv. State,2007WL 2417373 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi2O0T,no pet.) .. ....... 151 Verboisv.State,909S.W.2d140(Tex.App.-Houston[14thDist]1995,nopet.) . ....... 79 Vickersv. State,878 S.W.2d 329 (Tex.App.-FortWorth 1994, pet. refd) ........ 42 Vilfa v. State, 2009 WL 243'1511 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2009, pet. refd) . . . . 150 Vi||area|v.State'2008WL4367616(Tex'App.-Houston[1.tDist]2008,nopet.).. Vrba v. State,151 S.W.3d 676 (Tex.App.-Waco, October 27 , 2004, pdr ref d.) . . . . . 2 Waqnerv. State,720 S.W.2d 827 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1986, pet. refd) . . ...... 73 Walkerv.State,T0l S.W.2d2(Tex.App.-CorpusChristi1985, pet. refd) ...... 149 Wafface v. State.2005 WL 3465515 (Tex.App.-TexarkanaDec20,2005, pdrdismissed) (Notdesignated for publication) 29 Walfacev. State,7O7 S.W.2d 928 (Tex. App.-Texarkana 19861, aff'd,7825.W.2d 854 (Tex.Crim.App. 19891 ... 43 Waltersv.State,757S.W.2d41 (Tex.App.-Houston[14thDist.]1988,nopet.).. ...... 134 Wanen v. State,2011WL 4036139 (Tex.App.-Houston [1 Dist.] 2011,pel. filed) . . . 51, 159 Wanick v. State, 634 S.W.2d 707,709 (Tex.Crim.App. 1982) Washburnv. State.235S.W.3d346,(Tex.App.-Texarkana2007,nopet.)..... ..... 70,92 Washinqton v. State, 350 S.W.2d 924 (Tex.Crim.App. 1961) . . . . . 137 Watson v. State, 2008 WL 5401497 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2008, pet. refd) . . . . . 150 Weaver v. State, 87 S.W.3d 557 (Tex.Crim .App.2002) . . . . 137 Websterv. State,26 S.W.3d 17 (Tex.App.-Waco 2000, pet. refd) .. ..... 58 Wehrinqv.State,276S.W.3d666(Tex.App.-Texarkana2008,nopet.).. ...... ....... 28 Wesfey v. State, 997 S.W.2d 874 (Tex.App.-Waco 1999, no pet.) . . . . . . 137 Wheatv. State,2011WL1259642 (Tex.App.- Houston [14h Dist.]2011) . ...... 104 ' "u l:*11 '1 fl*ill ::::':: 11:' ?::l ::::li:l 1":1 li:: : :11:: fll llT:ilo 'ooo\,, Whitev.State,634S.W.2d81 (Tex.App.-Austin 1982, nopet.) . ....... 127 Wi||v'State,794S.W'2d948(Tex'App._Houston[1stDist.]1990,pet.refd).. Williams v. State, 116 S.W.3d 788 (Tex.Crim.App. October 1,2003) . . . . . . 48 Wiffiamsv.State,2004WL 4g4622(Tex.App.-Dallas2004,pet.refd.)(Notdesignatedforpublication)........ 91 Williamsv. State,307 S.W.3d 862 (Tex.App.-FortWorth 2010, no pet.) ....... 123 Wi||iamsv'State'946S.W'2d432(Tex.App._FortWorth1997,nopet')'' Wiffiams v. State, 946 S.W.2d 886 (Tex.App.-Waco 1997, no pet.) .. ... 43,128 189
Page 1 and 2:
Driving While Intoxicated Case Law
Page 3 and 4:
2. DOESN'T APPLY 18 F. OFFICER'S AR
Page 5 and 6:
K, L. M. N. o. P. o. R. NOSOUND=NOP
Page 7 and 8:
F. G. H, L J. K. L. 3. NO RIGHT TO
Page 9 and 10:
C. D. STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR DR
Page 11 and 12:
E, F. G. H. t. J. K. L. M. N. o. P.
Page 13 and 14:
O. IF YOU ALLEGE MORE PRIOR DWI'S T
Page 15 and 16:
I. INFORMATION/CHARGING INSTRUMENT
Page 17 and 18:
B. IMPROPER QUESTION/STATEMENT Hark
Page 19 and 20:
DWI ROADBLOCKS A. ARE ILLEGAL Holt
Page 21 and 22:
V. OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE CHART The f
Page 23 and 24:
Elisibilitv for Occupational Driver
Page 25 and 26:
Villarealv. State, 2008 WL 4367616
Page 27 and 28:
out that hearsay is generally admis
Page 29 and 30:
Foster v. State, 326 S.W.3d 609 (Te
Page 31 and 32:
anyone other than officer to help h
Page 33 and 34:
F. OFFICER'S ARREST AUTHORITY WHEN
Page 35 and 36:
occur) who observed the traffic off
Page 37 and 38:
a mile in the early morning hours.
Page 39 and 40:
State v. Arriaqa, 5 S.W.3d 804 (Tex
Page 41 and 42:
explain the margin of error or the
Page 43 and 44:
P. "FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY''- SUFFIC
Page 45 and 46:
defendant from leaving. Officer sai
Page 47 and 48:
2. REASONABLE Bohren v. State,2011W
Page 49 and 50:
Sinqleton v. State. 91 S.W.3d 342 (
Page 51 and 52:
B. BASED ON'BREACH OF PEACE'THEORY
Page 53 and 54:
IX. VIDEO A. PARTS OF PREDICATE CAN
Page 55 and 56:
Mathieu v. State, 992 S.W.2d725 (Te
Page 57 and 58:
F. ABSENCE OF VIDEOTAPE 1. NOT GROU
Page 59 and 60:
K. NO SOUND = NO PROBLEM Aouirre v.
Page 61 and 62:
R. OFFICER'S NARRATIVE ON PERFORMAN
Page 63 and 64:
was effor, albeit harmless, to allo
Page 65 and 66:
forfeited in the guilt-innocence ph
Page 67 and 68:
ecoming the focus of a DWI investig
Page 69 and 70:
Rasan v. State,642S.W.2d 489 (Tex.C
Page 71 and 72:
2. OFFICER DOES NOT HAVE TO BE AN O
Page 73 and 74:
the reliability of VGN before it is
Page 75 and 76:
C. WALK AND TURN = LAY WITNESS TEST
Page 77 and 78:
G. FAILURE TO EXPLAIN FST'S IN DEFE
Page 79 and 80:
B. PROOF OF "STATE'' Barton v. Stat
Page 81 and 82:
C. INSTRUMENT CERTIFICATION 1, NEW
Page 83 and 84:
G. DIC.23 & DIC.24 WARNINGS 1. REQU
Page 85 and 86:
warning on refusing alcoholfesfs, b
Page 87 and 88:
efusing or of giving a sample for s
Page 89 and 90:
2. NO EVIDENCE THAT ADDITIONAL WARN
Page 91 and 92:
Hall v. State, 649 S.W.2d 627 (Tex.
Page 93 and 94:
3. AFTER 2 HOURS Holloway v. State,
Page 95 and 96:
P. BREATH TEST ADMISSIBLE AS PROOF
Page 97 and 98:
T. LOSS OF NORMAL & PER SE LAW EVID
Page 99 and 100:
fesf resu/fs were not inflammatory
Page 101 and 102:
6. IMPROPER ADMISSION OF EXTRAPOLAT
Page 103 and 104:
esu/fs. As long as fhe operator kno
Page 105 and 106:
suggesf that he was physically or m
Page 107 and 108:
D. PROCEDURE FOR TAKING BLOOD SAMPL
Page 109 and 110:
Thurman v. State, 861 S.W.2d 96 (Te
Page 111 and 112:
4. NOT NECESSARY TO SHOW WHO DREW T
Page 113 and 114:
Biqon v. State, 252 S.W.3d 360 (Tex
Page 115 and 116:
offense of DWI," the Court finds th
Page 117 and 118:
8. SEARCH WARRANT AFFIDAVIT CONTAIN
Page 119 and 120:
(b) FArAL Farhart v. State, 337 S.W
Page 121 and 122:
consenfs, 724.012 does not apply. H
Page 123 and 124:
in the Sfafe's case-in-chief, the S
Page 125 and 126:
was not the result of an involuntar
Page 127 and 128:
trance-like high. The Court affirme
Page 129 and 130:
C. CHARGE ON WORKING CONDITION OF I
Page 131 and 132:
intoxication sefs forfh alternative
Page 133 and 134:
of Appeals had misconstrued the act
Page 135 and 136:
the impairment element of the Sfafe
Page 137 and 138:
Sledqe v. State ,1994 WL 247961 (Te
Page 139 and 140:
V. WHEN CHARGE SPECIFICALLY USES SU
Page 141 and 142:
Tennerv v. State, 680 S.W.2d 629 (T
Page 143 and 144:
E. ENHANCEMENT OF FELONY DWI WITH N
Page 145 and 146:
Also, if stipulated that there are
Page 147 and 148:
of the priors. He then complained o
Page 149 and 150:
K. PROPER TO ALLEGE DATE PROBATION
Page 151 and 152: o. IF YOU ALLEGE MORE PRIOR DWI'S T
Page 153 and 154: a violation of the ex posf facto la
Page 155 and 156: W. EXPUNCTION WILL NOT ALWAYS RENDE
Page 157 and 158: intoxicated (DWI) from a C/ass B mi
Page 159 and 160: Holmberq v. State, 931 S.W.2d 3(Tex
Page 161 and 162: G. NO CONFLICT BETWEEN N'DUI'' AND
Page 163 and 164: equipment was obserued in the vehic
Page 165 and 166: unning, radio playing loudly, and d
Page 167 and 168: wheels was consr.stent with the whe
Page 169 and 170: Wriqht v. State, 932 S.W.2d 572 (Te
Page 171 and 172: Bucek v. State ,724 S.W .2d 129 (Te
Page 173 and 174: concerning how recently the vehicle
Page 175 and 176: B. DENIAL OF PROBATION DUE TO LANGU
Page 177 and 178: alcohol by calling a sysfem adminis
Page 179 and 180: Avfor v. State, 2011 WL 1659887 (Te
Page 181 and 182: Carrasco v. State,712S.W.2d 120 (Te
Page 183 and 184: Drapkin v. State, 781 S.W.2d 710 (T
Page 185 and 186: Folev v. State, 327 S.W.3d 907 (Tex
Page 187 and 188: (Tex.Crim.App. 1988)..... .......42
Page 189 and 190: Human v. State, 749 S.W.2d 832 {Tex
Page 191 and 192: Lewisv.State,72S.W.3d704(Tex.App.-F
Page 193 and 194: Moncivais v. State, 2O02WL 1445200
Page 195 and 196: Poncev. State,828 S.W.2d 50 (Tex.Ap
Page 197 and 198: Schaum v. State, 833 S.W.2d 644 (Te
Page 199 and 200: State v. Gerstenkom, 239 S.W.3d 357
Page 201: Stone v. State, 685 S.W.2d 791 (Tex
show all

Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?