Battle of the Bibles - Present Truth
Battle of the Bibles - Present Truth
Battle of the Bibles - Present Truth
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>the</strong> facts <strong>of</strong> history. Having acknowledged that <strong>the</strong> Westcott and Hort text "Leans<br />
towards <strong>the</strong> Vulgate" it claimed:<br />
"This in itself is not a blemish, for it is reasonable to believe that Jerome, when<br />
he was working out that standard Latin version, had access to older manuscripts than<br />
any that were available to <strong>the</strong> translators <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Authorised Version" (M.E. Olsen, "The<br />
Prose <strong>of</strong> Our King James Version", p 186).<br />
Such a statement would do credit to <strong>the</strong> most ardent Roman defender <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Vulgate and is supportive <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> claim that <strong>the</strong> Roman Catholic Church has been <strong>the</strong><br />
guardian <strong>of</strong> God's Word. It also ignores <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> Catholic Latin Version (Vulgate)<br />
has always been in conflict with <strong>the</strong> Waldensian <strong>Bibles</strong> (Traditional Text) whose<br />
pedigree dates back to <strong>the</strong> apostolic area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Antioch church. The martyr Reformers<br />
would not be impressed!<br />
Here indeed, is an intriguing mystery. Wilkinson's own "received him not". At first<br />
<strong>the</strong>y denounced him and finally ignored him. Yet Dr Fuller, in his preamble to <strong>the</strong> section<br />
<strong>of</strong> his book featuring Wilkinson, was able to say that although Dr Wilkinson is practically<br />
unknown to scholars, a careful study <strong>of</strong> his book reveals his thorough knowledge <strong>of</strong> his<br />
subject which shows him to be: "A scholar <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first rank" ("Which Bible?", p 174). 19<br />
(19 The author has been told that when Wilkinson's work is occasionally<br />
mentioned by students in <strong>the</strong> Seventh-day Adventist Colleges and Seminaries, his<br />
efforts are curtly dismissed with <strong>the</strong> statement that <strong>the</strong> denomination has long since<br />
Proven his arguments to be worthless. The facts are quite different!)<br />
In 1930 a General Conference committee, appointed to review Wilkinson's book,<br />
delivered a blistering attack on his "unauthorised" work. The author fortunately has a<br />
copy <strong>of</strong> Wilkinson's reply in which he methodically proceeds to dismantle <strong>the</strong><br />
committee's feeble and puerile arguments. Never again did <strong>the</strong> General Conference risk<br />
ano<strong>the</strong>r thrashing by attempting to gainsay his book - so it was just ignored.<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, even as Dr Fuller had decided to arrange his book around<br />
Wilkinson's masterful defence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> King James Version, <strong>the</strong> Seventh-day Adventist<br />
Church had decided to launch into a career, which can be described as, "Rome's Little<br />
Helper". Far from being content to mal-advise <strong>the</strong>ir own church members to "Use <strong>the</strong><br />
version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir choice" ("Problems in Translation", 1954, p 75), <strong>the</strong>y now launched a<br />
campaign <strong>of</strong> public education in which <strong>the</strong>y indiscriminately promoted <strong>the</strong> modern<br />
versions.<br />
Throughout <strong>the</strong>ir history, Seventh-day Adventists have placed great reliance on<br />
<strong>the</strong> printed word for <strong>the</strong> spreading <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gospel - a gospel which <strong>the</strong>y<br />
prefer to describe as "The everlasting gospel", as found in Revelation 14. It is because<br />
<strong>the</strong>y insist on following <strong>the</strong> Bible as <strong>the</strong>ir only guide and rule <strong>of</strong> faith that <strong>the</strong>ir pioneers<br />
arrived at some beliefs that are practically, if not totally, unique to Seventh-day<br />
Adventism.<br />
In order to spread <strong>the</strong>ir beliefs <strong>the</strong>y have built up a sizeable publishing business<br />
and a system <strong>of</strong> door-to-door distribution <strong>of</strong> books through a large network <strong>of</strong> supervised<br />
colporteurs.<br />
One such project was a pr<strong>of</strong>usely-illustrated book published in 1959 by <strong>the</strong><br />
denominationally owned Review and Herald Publishing Association in Washington D.C.,<br />
titled, "Your Bible and You". It has become well known over <strong>the</strong> intervening a years, not<br />
only to Seventh-day Adventists, but to scores <strong>of</strong> thousands who recognised <strong>the</strong> author,<br />
Arthur S. Maxwell, as Uncle Arthur <strong>of</strong> "Bedtime Story" fame.<br />
"Your Bible and You", as <strong>the</strong> name implies, sets out to give people confidence in<br />
<strong>the</strong> Bible as <strong>the</strong> true Word <strong>of</strong> God, and it <strong>the</strong>n proceeds to present Adventist beliefs from<br />
2