Battle of the Bibles - Present Truth
Battle of the Bibles - Present Truth
Battle of the Bibles - Present Truth
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Only <strong>the</strong> Douay agrees with <strong>the</strong> KJV by referring to <strong>the</strong> fulfilment <strong>of</strong> Messianic<br />
prophecy.<br />
Mark 15:28<br />
"And <strong>the</strong> scripture was fulfilled, which saith, And he was numbered with <strong>the</strong><br />
transgressors".<br />
RV and RSV This verse is omitted but recorded in a note.<br />
JB and NIV The entire verse is omitted.<br />
Group 2. Attacks on Christ's Divinity, His Eternal Pre-Existence and<br />
His Creatorship.<br />
Daniel 3:25<br />
"Lo, I see four men loose, walking in <strong>the</strong> midst <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fire, and <strong>the</strong>y have no hurt;<br />
and <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fourth is like <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>of</strong> God".<br />
RV "and <strong>the</strong> aspect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fourth is like a son <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gods".<br />
RSV "and <strong>the</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fourth is like a son <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gods ".<br />
JB and NIV "and <strong>the</strong> fourth looks like a son <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gods".<br />
The translators <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> KJV and <strong>the</strong> Douay reflect <strong>the</strong> early Christian view that <strong>the</strong><br />
fourth person was <strong>the</strong> second person <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Godhead. In doing so, <strong>the</strong>y are<br />
acknowledging Christ's preexistence. The above four versions which fail to make this<br />
point ignore <strong>the</strong> context where Nebuchadnezzar acknowledged <strong>the</strong> superiority <strong>of</strong> Israel's<br />
God (Daniel 3:26-29; 4:2). They are in line with Origenism.<br />
Micah 5:2<br />
"But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among <strong>the</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong><br />
Judah, yet out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>e shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose<br />
goings forth have been from <strong>of</strong> old, from everlasting".<br />
RV Note "whose goings forth are from <strong>of</strong> old, or from ancient days ".<br />
RSV "whose origin is from <strong>of</strong> old, from ancient days ".<br />
JB "His origin goes back to <strong>the</strong> distant past, to <strong>the</strong> days <strong>of</strong> old ".<br />
NIV "whose origins are from <strong>of</strong> old, from ancient times".<br />
It will be noted that <strong>the</strong>re is an eternity <strong>of</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> terms: 'from<br />
everlasting" and from: "ancient <strong>of</strong> days" or "times ". Again, <strong>the</strong> progression <strong>of</strong> error from<br />
<strong>the</strong> note in <strong>the</strong> RV to <strong>the</strong> later versions is obvious. Christ's everlasting coexistence in <strong>the</strong><br />
Godhead is denigrated.<br />
Mat<strong>the</strong>w 27:54<br />
"Now when <strong>the</strong> centurion, and <strong>the</strong>y that were with him, watching Jesus, saw <strong>the</strong><br />
earthquake, and those things that were done, <strong>the</strong>y feared greatly, saying, Truly this<br />
was <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>of</strong> God"<br />
RV Note and RSV "Truly this was a son <strong>of</strong> God".<br />
JB "In truth, this was a son <strong>of</strong> God".<br />
4