09.04.2013 Views

Jul 2012 - Issue 5 - National Federation of Fish Friers

Jul 2012 - Issue 5 - National Federation of Fish Friers

Jul 2012 - Issue 5 - National Federation of Fish Friers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chips (Thickness)<br />

We tested 3 different thicknesses <strong>of</strong> chips (14mm x14mm, 14mm x 17mm<br />

and 17mm x 17mm) all fried in palm fat and also cooked one sample by<br />

blanching and one straight through to see if blanching affected the fat and<br />

calorie content. The results are per 100 grams.<br />

CHIP SIZE (mm) CALORIES FAT (Grams)<br />

14 x 14 220 8.6<br />

14 x 17 208 8.3<br />

17 x 17 212 9.0<br />

14 x 17 (blanched) 225 8.7<br />

Summary: A chip cut to the size <strong>of</strong> 14 x 17mm proved to be the healthiest<br />

in term <strong>of</strong> having fewer calories and less fat. We expected a thicker chip cut<br />

to 17 x 17mm to be the healthiest but this came out with higher results. This<br />

can perhaps be explained by the requirement <strong>of</strong> a longer cooking time,<br />

meaning more time to absorb the fat, or it could be due to the fact that the<br />

17 x 17mm chips were “ready chips” and the others freshly prepared in the<br />

training school that morning.<br />

<strong>Fish</strong> (Portion Sizes)<br />

We tested 3 different sizes <strong>of</strong> fish (4oz, 6oz and 10oz). The same batter was<br />

used for all samples and all the fish used was Icelandic FAS Cod. The results<br />

are per 100 grams.<br />

FISH SIZE (mm) CALORIES FAT (Grams)<br />

4oz Cod 227 16.7<br />

6oz Cod 240 17.3<br />

10oz Cod 265 20.3<br />

Summary: The results indicate that bigger fish contain more fat and calories<br />

per 100g, meaning that an accurate result cannot be obtained by simply<br />

testing one size <strong>of</strong> fish then applying to other sizes (i.e. testing a 4 oz fish<br />

and then multiplying by 2 to get results for an 8 oz fish)<br />

Chips (Portion Sizes)<br />

We fried chips cut to 14 x 17 mm in palm fat and then produced the<br />

nutritional values for various portion sizes commonly <strong>of</strong>fered in fish and chip<br />

shops.<br />

PORTION OF CHIPS (oz) CALORIES FAT (Grams)<br />

5oz 295 11.9<br />

10oz 589 23.8<br />

15oz 884 35.7<br />

20oz 1177 47.5<br />

25oz 1473 59.5<br />

Summary: The portion size you sell has a huge impact on the total fat and<br />

calories your customers consume. However healthy the product is, if portion<br />

sizes are very large the customer will have consumed a high amount <strong>of</strong> fat<br />

and large number <strong>of</strong> calories.<br />

Overall Summary<br />

<strong>Fish</strong> and chips are less than 10% fat if properly cooked and an average<br />

sized portion is less than 1000 calories.<br />

Adding peas to the meal lowers fat and calories per 100 grams, but as peas<br />

contain approximately 100 calories per 100 grams, this increases the total<br />

calories consumed in the meal.<br />

<strong>Issue</strong> 5 <strong>Jul</strong>y <strong>2012</strong><br />

Rapeseed oil (when in optimum condition) produces the healthiest product,<br />

but breaks down more easily than other frying mediums. It is, however, a<br />

reasonable view that the customer expectation <strong>of</strong> taste is more important.<br />

The size <strong>of</strong> portion you serve is key to total calories and fat your<br />

customers consume.<br />

In our original article about nutritional testing in the FFR, Mark Drummond<br />

wrote that a large portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fish</strong>, Chips & Peas could be up to 1600 calories,<br />

and this resulted in complaints from several members saying it was an<br />

exaggeration. Our results show that a 10oz <strong>Fish</strong>, 15oz portion <strong>of</strong> Chips and<br />

7oz Peas (not an exceptionally large portion in some places) actually<br />

contained 1846 calories.<br />

Our results also show that the proportion <strong>of</strong> fish/chips/peas in a meal has a<br />

big effect on the fat and calorie content, as the fried fish is higher in fat and<br />

calories than chips, and peas are almost fat free and less than half the calories<br />

per 100 grams <strong>of</strong> the chips. So for example a meal consisting <strong>of</strong> a 4oz fish,<br />

10oz portion <strong>of</strong> chips and 7oz Peas would contain 1110 calories (186 calories<br />

per 100 grams), whereas a meal consisting <strong>of</strong> a 10oz fish, 7 oz portion <strong>of</strong><br />

chips and 4oz peas would contain 1291 calories (217 calories per 100<br />

grams), even though the total weight <strong>of</strong> both the meals were the same (21oz<br />

or 594 grams).<br />

Further tests would need to be done to establish if treating chips with<br />

preservatives effects nutritional content and also if pre-produced ready chips<br />

have different fat and calorie levels to those produced in a shop.<br />

For the full spread sheet <strong>of</strong> results please visit the NFFF website<br />

www.federation<strong>of</strong>fishfriers.co.uk<br />

NFFF MEMBER SPECIAL OFFER<br />

15% DISCOUNT OFF FISH AND CHIP TESTING FOR<br />

CURRENT NFFF MEMBERS. PLEASE QUOTE MEMBERSHIP<br />

NUMBER AS REFERENCE.<br />

Please contact Stelios Theocharous to book your test now: -<br />

084537115522 - stelios@fishandchipstest.co.uk<br />

www.fishandchipstest.co.uk<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!