01.05.2013 Views

Mpumalanga Biodiversity Conservation Plan Handbook - bgis-sanbi

Mpumalanga Biodiversity Conservation Plan Handbook - bgis-sanbi

Mpumalanga Biodiversity Conservation Plan Handbook - bgis-sanbi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MPUMALANGA BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION PLAN HANDBOOK<br />

34<br />

African Fish Eagle<br />

Haliaeetus vocifer<br />

The fish eagle has one of<br />

Africa’s most characteristic<br />

calls. It is widespread<br />

over the continent south<br />

of the Sahara but absent<br />

from the North western<br />

Cape, Namaqualand and<br />

southern Namibia. It is<br />

quite common in the<br />

Lowveld of <strong>Mpumalanga</strong>.<br />

The wingspan of females<br />

approaches 2.5 metres.<br />

The birds feed primarily<br />

on fish and have in some<br />

places become key tourist<br />

attractions, feeding<br />

willingly on dead fish<br />

thrown into the water.<br />

They also eat terrapins,<br />

waterfowl and baby<br />

crocodiles.<br />

To measure the effectiveness of a PA network it is necessary to first determine how biodiversity<br />

is distributed across the landscape. Once we know what occurs where, we can analyse how<br />

well the current network captures the full range of known biodiversity. However, it is not<br />

enough simply to know how much biodiversity is being protected. Questions such as which<br />

PAs are contributing the most to conservation and how unprotected areas can contribute to<br />

the overall biodiversity protection task, also need to be answered.<br />

TYPES AND GROUPS OF PROTECTED AREAS<br />

<strong>Mpumalanga</strong>’s 45 formal PAs are state owned and managed. There are 115 additional,<br />

informal PAs comprising private land committed in one way or another to conservation. The<br />

informal PAs may be further subdivided on the basis of their legal and administrative security<br />

(see Groups 1 to 3 below). There are 18 private reserves that are actively managed, relatively<br />

secure and formalised. The remaining 97 PAs are informally conserved areas whose current<br />

and future status is uncertain. Together this forms an extended PA network of sufficient significance<br />

that the full 160 PAs deserve to be assessed for their combined contribution to<br />

provincial biodiversity conservation. Details of the extended PA network are provided in<br />

Appendix 3 and summarised in Table 5.2. In outline it comprises the following:<br />

FORMAL / INFORMAL GROUP NO TYPES OF PROTECTED AREA<br />

Formal protected areas Group 1 45 National Parks; Provincial Parks<br />

and Nature Reserves<br />

Private protected areas Group 2 18 Municipal, Private and leasedland<br />

Nature Reserves<br />

Unsecured protected areas Group 3 97 SA Natural Heritage Sites;<br />

Conservancies on private or<br />

state land.<br />

TYPES OF BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT<br />

The MBCP provides for two different types of assessment:<br />

The main assessment of the MBCP (Chapter 4) examined the protection levels of<br />

biodiversity features across the entire Province, together with an analysis of<br />

priority biodiversity areas. Protected areas (mainly formal) were included, but<br />

only for assessing the amount of each biodiversity feature currently protected.<br />

This analysis did not attempt to assess the value within and between protected<br />

areas. In effect each PA was treated as a single planning unit for the purpose of<br />

the analysis. The focus of this type of assessment is to identify biodiversity outside<br />

the PA network for cooperative stewardship programmes or other conservation<br />

initiatives, such as ensuring sustainable development.<br />

The purpose of the PA assessment is to determine the contribution of each PA towards<br />

meeting biodiversity targets. However, this assessment first examined at the level<br />

of protection that each vegetation type was afforded within the formal PA<br />

network. Then the extended network was assessed in terms of each PA’s contribution<br />

towards meeting biodiversity targets (as explained in Chapter 4). This<br />

M P U M A L A N G A<br />

provided an assessment of how well the current PA network is doing in meeting<br />

<strong>Biodiversity</strong><br />

biodiversity targets, as well as identifying opportunities outside current PAs, where<br />

protection of biodiversity needs strengthening. As a foundation for the PA assessment,<br />

the location, extent and status of all formal and informal PAs in the<br />

Province were determined (see Appendix 3).<br />

CONSERVATION PLAN HANDBOOK

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!