Astronautical and Aeronautical Events of 1962 - NASA's History Office
Astronautical and Aeronautical Events of 1962 - NASA's History Office
Astronautical and Aeronautical Events of 1962 - NASA's History Office
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
May 10: House Science <strong>and</strong> Astronautics Committee authorized record<br />
$3.7 billion for NASA in FY 1963, cutting $116 million from<br />
NASA’s<br />
request.<br />
0 Deputy Secretary <strong>of</strong> Defense Roswell Gilpatric, at Wilton, Conn.,<br />
stated that peaceful uses <strong>of</strong> outer space was still the National<br />
goal but that the U.S. would be “ill-advised if we did not hedge<br />
our bets.” He said that a satellite interception system would get<br />
serious attention if another nation was developing such a capa-<br />
bility. “We ought to be ready,” he said in a press conference,<br />
‘‘to anticipate the ability <strong>of</strong> the Soviets at some time to use space<br />
<strong>of</strong>fensively . ”<br />
0 Premier Nikita Iihrushchev said in speech to transport workers<br />
that despite the claims <strong>of</strong> American scientists no U.S. rocket has<br />
hit the moon: “The Americans have tried several times to hit the<br />
moon with their rockets. They have proclaimed for all the world<br />
to hear that they had launched rockets to the moon, but they<br />
missed every time. The Soviet pennant on the moon has been<br />
awaiting an American one for a long time but in vain <strong>and</strong> is<br />
becoming lonesome. ”<br />
In answering Premier Khrushchev, Dr. William Pickering, Director<br />
<strong>of</strong> JPL, stated: “On April 26, at 4:47.50 AM, Pacific st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
time, RANGER IV was tracked by the Goldstone receiver as it<br />
passed the leading edge <strong>of</strong> the moon. At 4:49.53 it crashed on<br />
the moon at a lunar longitude <strong>of</strong> 229.5 degrees East <strong>and</strong> lunar<br />
latitude <strong>of</strong> 15.5 degrees South.” After 64 hours <strong>of</strong> tracking, the<br />
trajectory <strong>of</strong> RANGER IV was precisely known <strong>and</strong> it was only 110<br />
miles from the surface when it vanished behind the moon.<br />
0 NASA X-15 pilot, Joseph Walker, said that film taken during recent<br />
record altitude flight <strong>of</strong> 246,700 feet showed five or six mysterious<br />
objects. Other space pilots on the panel at the National Con-<br />
ference on the Peaceful Uses <strong>of</strong> Space at Seattle, all <strong>of</strong> whom have<br />
flown above 100,000 feet, were Cdr. Malcolm Ross (USNR) Capt.<br />
Joseph Kittinger (USAF), Col. David Sirnons (USAF), Neii Arm-<br />
strong (NASA), Cdr. Forrest Petersen (USN), Maj. Robert White<br />
(USAF), <strong>and</strong> Lt. Col. John H. Glenn (USMC).<br />
In session on the impact <strong>of</strong> space exploration on society at the Second<br />
Conference on the Peaceful Uses <strong>of</strong> Space, President Lee Du-<br />
Bridge <strong>of</strong> the California Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology said that man is<br />
limited as a butterfly: “Man is out <strong>of</strong> his cocoon [in space] . . .<br />
his life span is too short to get very far from home.” DuBridge<br />
pointed out that a flight to the nearest star would take at least<br />
40,000 years <strong>and</strong> that a trip to Mars at present speeds would<br />
take six months, “but months would run into years even reaching<br />
other planets <strong>of</strong> the earth’s system. We are not going to accom-<br />
plish space travel except to nearby planets for many generations<br />
to come.”<br />
0 In talk at National Conference on Peaceful Uses <strong>of</strong> Space, William<br />
E. Meckling, RAND Corp. economist, stated that space-age<br />
economic pay<strong>of</strong>fs are being exaggerated: “The exploration <strong>of</strong><br />
space is a very exciting affar, indeed. . . . If glamour displaces<br />
science in guiding national policy, however, the results may be<br />
disa pointing. . . .<br />
communications satellite system that charges prices not<br />
very much different from present prices <strong>and</strong> that must be con-<br />
stantly subsidized <strong>and</strong> protected from competition, is not much<br />
<strong>of</strong> an accomplishment. . . .