03.06.2013 Views

The Ethnicity of the Sea Peoples - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

The Ethnicity of the Sea Peoples - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

The Ethnicity of the Sea Peoples - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fig. 25. Origins <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cretan hieroglyphic script. (a) Luwian hieroglyphic<br />

(56 signs); (b) Egyptian hieroglyphic (14 signs). 641<br />

1 Egypt; 2 Byblos; 3 Cyprus; 4 Asia Minor; 5 Crete; 6 mainland<br />

Greece<br />

As to <strong>the</strong> linguistic context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> signs discussed<br />

above, this has been dealt with elsewhere as far as <strong>the</strong> discus<br />

<strong>of</strong> Phaistos (# 333), 642 <strong>the</strong> double-axe from Arkalokhori<br />

(# 332), <strong>the</strong> altar-stone from Malia (# 328), <strong>the</strong> seals<br />

from Zyro (# 193, # 277), Malia (# 271), Neapolis (#<br />

314), 643 and Sitia (# 310), 644 and <strong>the</strong> recurrent formulas<br />

are concerned. It <strong>the</strong>refore may suffice here, as an example<br />

<strong>of</strong> what <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> signs may lead up to in <strong>the</strong> field<br />

<strong>of</strong> linguistics, to present an overview <strong>of</strong> seals recording <strong>the</strong><br />

categories (1) “man’s name” (= MN) and (2) “title” or (1)<br />

“MN”, (2) “title”, and (3) “place or country name” (see table<br />

8 and Fig. 26) – categories to be expected on seals in<br />

<strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parallels: compare, for example, <strong>the</strong> Luwian<br />

hieroglyphic part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tarkondemos seal, bearing<br />

<strong>the</strong> legend TARKU-tí+mi H ANTAWAT mi+r(a)-à UTNA “Tarkondemos,<br />

king (<strong>of</strong>) <strong>the</strong> land Mira”, 645 or that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> seal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Kuzitesup from Lidarhöyük, reading ku-zi ! -TESUP-pa<br />

H ANTAWAT ká+r-ka-mi-sà TAL-mi-TESUP-pa H ANTAWAT<br />

ká+r-ka-mi-sà (…) infans “Kuzitesup, king <strong>of</strong> Karkamis,<br />

641 Diagram drawn by Wim van Binsbergen.<br />

642 Best & Woudhuizen 1988: 30-84; Best & Woudhuizen 1989:<br />

65-97; Woudhuizen 1992a: 11-41; Achterberg, Best, Enzler,<br />

Rietveld & Woudhuizen 2004.<br />

643 Best & Woudhuizen 1989: 97-128.<br />

644 Woudhuizen 2002a.<br />

645 Best & Woudhuizen 1989: 108-11; cf. Hawkins 2003: 144,<br />

Fig. 1a and Woudhuizen 2005 : appendix I.<br />

128<br />

son <strong>of</strong> Talmitesup, king <strong>of</strong> Karkamis, (…)”. 646<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MNs are <strong>of</strong> Luwian type: Muwas (cf. Hittite<br />

Muwatallis), 647 Partarus (= Lydian Bartara), 648 Nuwas<br />

(cf. Cappadocian reduplicated Nuwanuwas), 649<br />

Taparas (= Lycian Daparas), 650 Tarkus, Tarkumuwas (=<br />

Cilician Tarkoms), 651 and possibly Manas (= Lydian<br />

Manes). 652 Next, one is <strong>of</strong> Kaskan type: Pitaparas (= Kaskan<br />

Pittaparas), 653 whereas <strong>the</strong> first element <strong>of</strong> Ankiwas<br />

seems to recall that <strong>of</strong> Trojan Ankhises. 654 Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,<br />

under consideration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that Cretan hieroglyphic [l]<br />

may also express [r], Yatale corresponds to Ugaritic Ytr as<br />

in Bnytr (Bin-ia-ta-ri), Ytrhd (Yatar-addu), Ytršp (Ia-tarrašap),<br />

etc. 655 Finally, under consideration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aforesaid<br />

interchangeability <strong>of</strong> [l] with [r] and on <strong>the</strong> analogy <strong>of</strong><br />

Luwian hieroglyphic Murlis and Halis, 656<br />

Manile may657 be analyzed as an abridged form <strong>of</strong> Egyptian<br />

Men-r‘.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> titles, laparnas (= Hittite labarnas) 658 , PÁRAcustos<br />

“viceroy” (cf. titles like Latin pro-consul), and<br />

tupa- “scribe” 659 are <strong>of</strong> Anatolian type. Next, pini<br />

corresponds to Semitic bn as in Ugaritic bn Lky “representative<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lycians”. 660 Finally, bi’ty or pit or piti is<br />

646 Hawkins 2000: 574-5; cf. Hawkins 2003, 144, Fig. 1c.<br />

647 Hawkins 2003: 144, Fig. 1b.<br />

648 Gusmani, 1964: 264, no. 40, 2; cf. Best & Woudhuizen 1989:<br />

126; Woudhuizen forthc. 2.<br />

649 Laroche 1966, s.v.; cf. Best & Woudhuizen 1989: 126.<br />

650 Friedrich 1932: 55, TL 6, 1; cf. Best & Woudhuizen 1989:<br />

126.<br />

651 Houwink ten Cate 1961: 127.<br />

652 Gusmani 1964: 250, no. 1, 3; 252, no. 4a, 1 and no. 4b, 1; cf.<br />

Best & Woudhuizen 1989: 126. I cannot resist <strong>the</strong> temptation to<br />

suggest that we may actually be dealing here with <strong>the</strong> Cretan royal<br />

name Minos; note in this connection that # 257 is <strong>the</strong> most beautiful<br />

seal, used by Evans for <strong>the</strong> cover <strong>of</strong> his book on <strong>the</strong> topic!<br />

653 Von Schuler 1965: Indices, 2. Personennamen, s.v.<br />

654 Homeros, Iliad II, 820, etc.<br />

655 Gröndahl 1967, s.v. ytr.<br />

656 Beran 1967: nos. 180 (um+r-li) and 186 (®á+li).<br />

657 Ranke 1935, s.v. mn-®pr-r‘.<br />

658 Friedrich 1991, s.v.; cf. Best & Woudhuizen 1989: 117-8.<br />

659 Laroche 1960a: *326.<br />

660 Gordon 1955: glossary, s.v.; Astour 1964: 194; Woudhuizen

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!