Brand value increases across categories
Brand value increases across categories
Brand value increases across categories
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Part 1 | Highlights Introduction<br />
Introduction<br />
BRANDZ TOP 100 RISES<br />
7 PERCENT WITH GROWTH<br />
ACROSS CATEGORIES<br />
Year of recovery, refinement and relevance<br />
THERE WAS a new tone.<br />
It fit the new normal. Both brands<br />
and consumers adjusted to constant<br />
uncertainty and sober expectations<br />
about economic growth. They fit into<br />
the calculus of consumption the impact<br />
on the natural environment, personal<br />
health, and human wellbeing along the<br />
supply chain.<br />
Shaped by these considerations, brand<br />
<strong>value</strong> appreciated.<br />
The <strong>value</strong> of the <strong>Brand</strong>Z Top 100 Most<br />
Valuable Global <strong>Brand</strong>s rose 7 percent to<br />
$2.6 trillion last year, compared with a<br />
flat performance a year ago. All but two of<br />
the 13 <strong>categories</strong> analyzed in this report<br />
improved in brand <strong>value</strong>. Technology and<br />
oil and gas declined modestly.<br />
These results indicate that strong brands<br />
continue to regain <strong>value</strong> lost during the<br />
recession and now, in some cases, surpass<br />
their pre-recession levels.<br />
The total brand <strong>value</strong> of the <strong>Brand</strong>Z Top<br />
100 Strong <strong>Brand</strong>s Portfolio has improved<br />
77 percent since 2006. In addition, the<br />
<strong>Brand</strong>Z Top 100 Strong <strong>Brand</strong>s Portfolio,<br />
comprised of diverse public companies,<br />
appreciated 58 percent during that<br />
eight-year period, compared with a market<br />
<strong>value</strong> gain of only 23 percent by the<br />
S&P 500.<br />
Despite a sharp decline in the growth of<br />
its brand <strong>value</strong> last year, Apple remained<br />
number one in the <strong>Brand</strong>Z Top 100<br />
ranking, on the strength of the meaningful<br />
difference of its brand. Google moved<br />
to the number two position, marginally<br />
surpassing IBM, which continues to be<br />
the world’s most valuable B2B brand.<br />
These brands demonstrate both the<br />
capacity to grow brand strength quickly<br />
(Apple was founded in 1976, Google<br />
in 1998) and sustain it over time (IBM<br />
celebrated its centennial in 2011).<br />
Three key themes emerge from the<br />
<strong>Brand</strong>Z Top 100 Most Valuable Global<br />
<strong>Brand</strong>s 2013:<br />
Recovery<br />
The economy continued to improve—<br />
not everywhere, but in the US. All<br />
<strong>categories</strong> experienced healthy sales.<br />
Refinement<br />
With confidence still fragile, brands<br />
resisted introducing break-through<br />
innovations and instead encouraged<br />
consumer spending with incremental<br />
product and service improvements.<br />
Relevance<br />
Reaching these more reflective<br />
consumers required offering products<br />
and services that not only projected<br />
mass appeal, but also promised<br />
personal relevance for the individual.<br />
Up 7%<br />
<strong>Brand</strong>Z Portfolio outperforms S&P 500<br />
Over the past seven years, the S&P 500<br />
increased 23 percent in market <strong>value</strong>. In<br />
contrast, the <strong>Brand</strong>Z Portfolio of the<br />
strongest brands appreciated 58 percent.<br />
The comparison shows that strong<br />
brands outperformed the stock market<br />
benchmark by a wide margin of 28%.<br />
8 <strong>Brand</strong>Z Top 100 Most Valuable Global <strong>Brand</strong>s 2013 9<br />
60%<br />
40%<br />
20%<br />
0%<br />
-20%<br />
-40%<br />
-60%<br />
<strong>Brand</strong>Z Strong <strong>Brand</strong>s Portfolio<br />
S&P 500<br />
Apr 06 Apr 07 Apr 08 Apr 09 Apr 10 Apr 11 Apr 12 Apr 13<br />
Source: Bloomberg<br />
58%<br />
23%