Regional Balkans Infrastructure Study Transport - WBC-INCO Net

More documents

Recommendations

Info

This report was prepared by the REBIS Consultants 1 in cooperation with representatives of the Ministries of Transport and Finance of the concerned countries 2 and under the supervision of the Infra- structure Steering Group for South East Europe 3 (ISG). Among the numerous persons who contributed to the Project we wish to recognize the following: Tatiana Arsova Head of European Integration Division, Ministry of Finance, FYRO Macedonia Giorgio Balzarro European Commission, EuropeAid Ollivier Bodin European Commission, EC/World Bank Office for South East Europe Bernard Chatelin REBIS Resident Economist, FYRO Macedonia with responsibility for Kosovo Christophe Chevet REBIS Resident Economist, Bosnia and Herzegovina Vincenzo Comito REBIS Resident Economist, Serbia and Montenegro Massimo d’Eufemia European Investment Bank Tihomir Domazet Assistant Minister, Ministry of Finance, Croatia Jean Dropinski European Commission, European Agency for Reconstruction Nikola Lukic Deputy Director, EU Directorate, Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Serbia and Montenegro Zisis J. Haritos Advisor to the ISG Axel Hörhager European Investment Bank Zahida Hurtic-Strika Assistant to Minister of Civil Affairs and Communications, Bosnia and Herzegovina Oswald Hutter Stability Pact Erling Hvid COWI, Project Director Jusuf Kalamperovic Vice Prime Minister, Montenegro Giorgio Kirchmayr Principal International Officer, UNMIK EU Pillar Marijan Klaric Government Coordinator for REBIS, Ministry of Maritime Affairs, Transport & Communications, Croatia Danijel Krakic Technical Advisor, Ministry of Maritime Affairs, Transport & Communications, Croatia Sanna Kuukka European Commission, DG TREN Miograd Jocic Deputy Minister, Ministry of Transport & Telecommunications, Serbia Gordana Lazarevic Assistant Minister, Ministry of International Economic Relations, Serbia Andrija Lompar Minister of Maritime Affairs & Transport, Montenegro Tony Mack REBIS Resident Economist, Croatia Acknowledgements Zlate Manev Grad. Civ. Eng., Funds for National and Regional Roads, FYRO Macedonia Olivera Medar Deputy Minister, Transport & Telecommuni- cations, Serbia Michele Meunier Council of Europe Development Bank Eva Molnar World Bank Lin O’Grady European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Mary O’Mahony Stability Pact Patrick Paquet European Commission, DG RELEX George Patsiavos Secretary of Corridor X, Ministry of Transport Karsten Pedersen COWI and Communications, Greece Graeme Preston European Commission, DG TREN Eduard Prodani Secretary General, Ministry of Transport and Telecommunications, Albania Shqipe Rumbullaku Director, Ministry of Economy, Department of Public Investment Programming, Albania Nikola Sego Deputy to Minister of Civil Affairs and Communications, Ministry of Civil Affairs and Communications, Bosnia and Herzegovina Dino Sinigallia European Commission, EuropeAid, Chairman ISG Edgar Thielmann European Commission, DG TREN Graham Sims European Commission, DG TREN Cornelis Smits REBIS Resident Economist, Albania Bernard Snoy Stability Pact Margret Thalwitz World Bank, EC/World Bank Office for South East Europe Patrick Walsh European Investment Bank Yllka Zaloshnja General Director of Programming Department, Ministry of Transport, Albania Fatmir Zanaj Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Albania Biljana Zdraveva Assistant Minister, Transport and Communications, FYRO Macedonia 1 A joint venture between COWI, BCEOM and SYSTRA; 2 Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia and Montenegro, the former Yugoslav republic of Macedonia and UNMIK (Kosovo under international administration as per UNSCR 1244 of 10 June 1999); 3 Chaired by EuropeAid, the ISG associates the major IFI’s (Council of Europe Development Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, European Investment Bank and the World Bank), the EC Directorate General External Relations, the EC Directorate General Transport and Energy and the Stability Pact.
Page 1: European Commission 2000 CARDS Prog
Page 5 and 6: !" # $ $ $%& # ' ( "$ ! " # ! # 2 !
Page 7 and 8: !" # $ $ $%& High-level summary The
Page 9 and 10: Core Network, roads. Core network,
Page 11 and 12: 900% 800% 700% 600% 500% 400% 300%
Page 13 and 14: !" # $ $ $%& The long-term requirem
Page 15 and 16: !" # $ $ $%& The course of further
Page 17 and 18: !" # $ $ $%& ,) & $ ' $ ! Multi-mod
Page 19 and 20: !" # $ $ $%& , + " $ ' ! $ ! " The
Page 21 and 22: !" # $ $ $%& • review and recomme
Page 23 and 24: !" # $ $ $%& Chapter 3 presents the
Page 25 and 26: Figure 2.1 Pan-European corridors.
Page 27 and 28: Figure 2.2 Proposed core road netwo
Page 29 and 30: !" # $ $ $%& The Core Network also
Page 31 and 32: Figure 2.5 Routes and corridors, ro
Page 33 and 34: !" # $ $ $%& The information receiv
Page 35 and 36: Figure 2.8 Road condition. !" # $ $
Page 37 and 38: Figure 2.9 Present technical condit
Page 39 and 40: !" # $ $ $%& ,, Below a brief statu
Page 41 and 42: Table 2.5 Border crossings on the c
Page 43 and 44: !" # $ $ $%& der crossing facilitie
Page 45 and 46: !" # $ $ $%& Much work has already
Page 47 and 48: , !" # $ $ $%& ,, During the first
Page 49 and 50: Figure 2.13 Projected rail passenge
Page 51 and 52: !" # $ $ $%& For each mode of trans
Page 53 and 54:
!" # $ $ $%& car ownership is only
Page 55 and 56:
!" # $ $ $%& ,(, + For passenger ca
Page 57 and 58:
!" # $ $ $%& Table 2.12 Growth rate
Page 59 and 60:
!" # $ $ $%& multi-criteria screeni
Page 61 and 62:
!" # $ $ $%& design speed has been
Page 63 and 64:
!" # $ $ $%& This leads to a total
Page 65 and 66:
Figure 3.2 Location of road investm
Page 67 and 68:
Figure 3.3 Proposed rail modernisat
Page 69 and 70:
Table 3.3 Potential border crossing
Page 71 and 72:
Figure 3.5 Potential rail border cr
Page 73 and 74:
!" # $ $ $%& The screening of proje
Page 75 and 76:
!" # $ $ $%& 3 Ranking of the ident
Page 77 and 78:
!" # $ $ $%& Table 3.5 Number of ro
Page 79 and 80:
!" # $ $ $%& The analyses have been
Page 81 and 82:
!" # $ $ $%& Bo-H-10: Reconstructio
Page 83 and 84:
!" # $ $ $%& could turn out to be a
Page 85 and 86:
!" # $ $ $%& review of traffic regu
Page 87 and 88:
!" # $ $ $%& • improvement of the
Page 89 and 90:
Figure 3.10 Location of pre-feasibi
Page 91 and 92:
!" # $ $ $%& The investment costs p
Page 93 and 94:
Table 3.6 List of projects in short
Page 95 and 96:
!" # $ $ $%& A few projects were om
Page 97 and 98:
!" # $ $ $%& As the investment leve
Page 99 and 100:
!" # $ $ $%& Table 3.9 Distribution
Page 101 and 102:
!" # $ $ $%& works, followed by upg
Page 103 and 104:
!" # $ $ $%& Table 3.12 Distributio
Page 105 and 106:
!" # $ $ $%& During the REBIS proje
Page 107 and 108:
!" # $ $ $%& ! " The development of
Page 109 and 110:
!" # $ $ $%& In order to gain a bro
Page 111 and 112:
!" # $ $ $%& Construction and maint
Page 113 and 114:
!" # $ $ $%& • improve the protec
Page 115 and 116:
!" # $ $ $%& • improve transit th
Page 117 and 118:
Table 4.1 Summary of need for road
Page 119 and 120:
Table 4.2 Summary of status of road
Page 121 and 122:
!" # $ $ $%& ,, + $ " In principle,
Page 123 and 124:
!" # $ $ $%& Status of port managem
Page 125 and 126:
Table 4.5 Summary of status of airp
Page 127 and 128:
!" # $ $ $%& of the transport secto
Page 129 and 130:
, !" # $ $ $%& # " The financing of
Page 131 and 132:
!" # $ $ $%& ,, - $ ? Petroleum tax
Page 133 and 134:
!" # $ $ $%& In Serbia and Monteneg
Page 135 and 136:
!" # $ $ $%& , * ! 5> ! 6 ,, Past e
Page 137 and 138:
!" # $ $ $%& tries a BOT toll road
Page 139 and 140:
!" # $ $ $%& • Rule of law prevai
Page 141 and 142:
!" # $ $ $%& The last section prese
Page 143 and 144:
!" # $ $ $%& During the period 1985
Page 145 and 146:
!" # $ $ $%& region's railways, whi
Page 147 and 148:
!" # $ $ $%& Kosovo (UNMIK) Montene
Page 149 and 150:
!" # $ $ $%& 40% (around 33% in Alb
Page 151 and 152:
Montenegro (ZCG) Serbia (RTE) and Z
Page 153 and 154:
!" # $ $ $%& In Kosovo, the UNMIK R
Page 155 and 156:
!" # $ $ $%& The relationship betwe
Page 157 and 158:
!" # $ $ $%& % & $' $ ! Multi-modal
Page 159 and 160:
!" # $ $ $%& • access to the mark
Page 161 and 162:
!" # $ $ $%& %, 0 ! $ $ ! Apart fro
Page 163 and 164:
!" # $ $ $%& tainers and 18 semi-tr
Page 165 and 166:
!" # $ $ $%& Table 7.3 Container tr
Page 167 and 168:
!" # $ $ $%& Most of the container
Page 169 and 170:
!" # $ $ $%& to upgrade the handlin
Page 171 and 172:
!" # $ $ $%& transport systems. Thi
Page 173 and 174:
!" # $ $ $%& The starting point cou
Page 175 and 176:
!" # $ $ $%& ( $ ! The inland water
Page 177 and 178:
Figure 8.1 Core Inland Waterway Net
Page 179 and 180:
!" # $ $ $%& ways. The second objec
Page 181 and 182:
!" # $ $ $%& Even against a backgro
Page 183 and 184:
!" # $ $ $%& a role similar to that
Page 185 and 186:
!" # $ $ $%& 1 The status of the Sa
Page 187 and 188:
!" # $ $ $%& In the region, many of
Page 189 and 190:
!" # $ $ $%& The port of Dubrovnik
Page 191 and 192:
!" # $ $ $%& 2002. The main functio
Page 193 and 194:
!" # $ $ $%& + " $ ' ! $! " Since t
Page 195 and 196:
!" # $ $ $%& • an effort should b
Page 197 and 198:
!" # $ $ $%& • being a recognised
Page 199 and 200:
User Interface (VBA Forms) Reports
Page 201 and 202:
!" # $ $ $%& The initial screen of
Page 203 and 204:
!" # $ $ $%& Figure 10.5 Report dat
Page 205:
The contents of this publication is
show all

Regional Balkans Infrastructure Study Transport - WBC-INCO Net

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?